ipl-logo

The Case Of Timothy Ivory Carpenter Vs United States

364 Words2 Pages

In the case of Timothy Ivory Carpenter V. UNITED STATES Did the government overstep its bounds in Detroit without getting a probable cause warrant, and did the government violated the 4th amendment of Timothy Ivory Carpenter? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,but upon probable cause, the police have the right to searched, and the persons or things to be seized.That is the 4th amendment. So what are the facts of the case then? (“United States v. Carpenter.” American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, 12 Sept. 2017, www.aclu.org/cases/united-states-v-carpenter). Carpenter was involved in a string of bank robberies that occurred over a two-year period. Carpenter was the leader of the robberies, …show more content…

For Timothy Carpenter, the records revealed 12,898 separate points of location data, an average of 101 each day over the course of four months”.(https://www.aclu.org/cases/united-states-v-carpenter) “The ACLU,filed an amicus brief arguing that the government violated the Fourth Amendment when it obtained the location records from Mr. Carpenter’s wireless carrier without a warrant. After a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit held that no warrant is required under the Fourth Amendment, Mr. Carpenter’s defense attorney filed a petition for review by the Supreme Court. In June 2017, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. The ACLU continues to represent Mr. Carpenter before the court”. (https://www.aclu.org/cases/united-states-v-carpenter) So the question is still open to debate. Did the police officers volatile Timothy 4th amendment and should that throw the ruling of the court? Or should the case go on because Timothy didn't know his right and gave up the information freely. You

Show More
Related
695 Words | 3 Pages

Now although the office filled the warrant out he didn’t specify which unit in a multi-family housing unit was supposed to be search. Unfortunately, the police raided the wrong house or residence, which in returned caused them to kick down the door as well as terrorize an innocent family. Therefore, an innocent person could have gotten killed which has happened before in New York. However, the requirement that the location of a search warrant be specific isn’t “a technicality” but a core principle of the Fourth Amendment (washingtonpost.com. n.d.). Therefore, the reason that the Fourth Amendment was created goes back to the general warrants that the British crown issued to English

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Timothy Cole was convicted of Aggravated Sexual Assault on September 17th 1998. Timothy Cole was a 26-year-old young man who used to attend Texas Tech as a business major. While he attended Texas Tech, the police was looking for a serial rapist known as the “Tech Rapist”. It was March 24th 1985 when the crime that wrongfully convicted Mr. Cole occurred. It was a dark night when 24-year-old Texas Tech student Michele Mallin parked her car near a church to get to her apartment.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

Baltimore. Barron v. Baltimore presents an example of how the fifth amendment works and what it protects. In 1833, John Barron claimed that “the city of Baltimore had deprived him of his property in violation of the fifth amendment”(Alex McBride, “Landmark Cases- Barron v. Baltimore(1833)”, PBS). Due to destruction of his wharf caused by a nearby construction project, Barron chose to sue the mayor of Baltimore for damages. The judge on the case came to a conclusion that affected the way the fifth amendment was interpreted and enforced.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

The 4th amendment states that the right to privacy should not by violated by conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. In the hudson v. Palmer case, an inmate named Russel Palmer sued Ted Hudson who was an officer at the Virginia prison. Palmer stated that the officer had conducted a shakedown of his locker and cell in the attempt to find hidden contraband. After the search turned out to be unsuccessful, Officer Hudson, then charged Palmer for destroying state property, as they found a ripped pillow case in his cell. Ted Hudson won the case, as the court stated that the right to privacy does not apply within a prison cell.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

State of Georgia V. Marcus Dwayne Dixon (2003) Marcus Dixon was a highly recruited high school football player. His life suddenly took a tragic turn when he was falsely convicted of raping a 15 year old girl. The elements around his false conviction could have been avoided with some reform to the criminal justice courts system. Dixon initially had many charges against him but were narrowed down to statutory rape and aggravated child molestation. There was much racial disparity surrounding the jury on Dixon’s case, in that the county that Dixon committed his “crime” was a predominantly white population.

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

After reviewing Justice Brennan’s dissenting opinion, I cannot agree with his argument that a conducting a protective sweep surpasses the purpose of the Terry v. Ohio decision. Justice Brennan agreed that a protective sweep was not a full-blown search, but it was much more intrusive than a limited pat down for weapons or the frisk of an automobile (Sifferlen, 1991). Also, Justice Brennan also stated he believed officers’ should possess probable cause to initiate a protective sweep of a home (Sifferlen, 1991). The Terry v. Ohio decision permits law enforcement officers to perform a pat down of the outer clothing, when the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe the subject he or she is dealing with, is armed and dangerous (Hall, 2015). The main purpose of Terry v. Ohio decision is to locate weapons that may be used to hurt the

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

Who: Suspects- Donald Smith and twin brother, Ronald Smith. Victim- Genai Coleman (preschool teacher who was shot). What: Murder of a preschool teacher and a carjacking.

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

The Fourth Amendment: The 4th amendment provides protection in regards to the issuance of warrants sans probable cause and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This amendment implements the limit of law enforcement power to conduct searches, seize property, and make arrests. The 4th amendment however does permit searches and seizures when reasonable justification as to why the police need to conduct a search is established. If an individual believes to have a well-founded expectation of privacy of the location or material being searched, the 4th amendment will be upheld. The 4th amendment is classified as the most significant in terms of criminal justice due to the fact police do not violate the fourth amendment by making reasonable mistakes, however, intentional ignorance of the law is not excused.

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

The fourth amendment protects citizens from unlawful search and seizure. In order for a search and seizure to happen the police have to have evidence in order to get a warrant which allows them to search the citizens luggage, house, etc. In some cases the government may go to far, or invade privacy of others, but in this case the government didn’t go to far and this is proven in DLKs case, thermal imager, and heat image. In DLKs case he was taking reasonable expectation of privacy in the activities he was doing in his home.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

have in the past noted the Fourth Amendment’s relevance to the deprivations of liberty that go hand in hand with criminal prosecutions.” Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. at 274 (citing Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. at 114). The availability of a Fourth Amendment remedy ensures

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

Before the 20th century, there were few, if any, cases based on the Fourth Amendment. However, as surveillance by law enforcers became more common, these tactics, and others, were scrutinized in court cases throughout the 20th and 21st century. Within the past 50 years there have been more and more cases held to determine whether or not a citizen’s right were being violated or if authorities were within the law. Like a story with multiple timelines, the outcome of a case disputing the fourth amendment is not always clear or predictable. PII Like many of the other amendments, already established traditions of British law supported the concept of the IV Amendment.

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

Constitutional Internment? The Japanese Americans were put in internment camps, but many people today wonder if it was constitutional or not. I do not agree with the Executive Order of 9066, but the even if I did it would not be constitutional. The Executive Order of 9066 was unconstitutional because multiple amendments and procedures were not followed.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

The Verdict discussed how both cases were attempting to suppress evidence from their cell phones which now contain much more information than they once did. Cases like this continue to shape our rights. The fourth amendment is here to protect ourselves from being incriminated. In modern day the fourth amendment is in question due to new technology.

Read More
1496 Words | 6 Pages

Is war really a battle fought between two nations or more? The oxford definition of war is a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state. In relation to war, racial profiling can be seen as an undeclared war. An undeclared war is a term used for disagreement fought without an official declaration. The undeclared war between male minorities and police forces is a constant issue that is being surpassed in our society.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

Act violated the Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure. According to NBC News. Another shocking finding from this case was that by asking [Judge Aiken] to dismiss Mayfield's lawsuit, the judge said, the U.S. attorney general's office was "asking this court to, in essence, amend the Bill of Rights, by giving it an interpretation that would deprive it of any real meaning. This court declines to do so (Aiken). This came as a big shock to the nation because if the government was willing to ask for a dismissal of the lawsuit what else could they be doing behind our backs.

Read More

More about The Case Of Timothy Ivory Carpenter Vs United States

Open Document