ipl-logo

Psychological Effects Of Bullying

2314 Words10 Pages

Bullying- Social Psychology Social psychology effects us everyday and makes us behave in ways we might not agree with. When we are put in a group we change the way we act towards others without a real explanation, our desire to fit in is greater then we might perceive it to be. Bullying. Something which occurs at all the time everywhere. How come it can go on like this when everyone is so aware of the fact that it is happening and knows exactly who the bully is and the one being bullied but yet no one intervenes? The human race is a herd animal, we live in groups and not alone as some other spices do. We simply can not mange on our own. We have a natural desire to fit in to our group and act alike, not to stand out. So if the majority of …show more content…

Zimbardos Stanford prison experiment. Milgram had put up an electric chock machine and gave the test person questions to ask another person in the other room, if the person answered incorrectly they had to give them an electric shock. The voltage went up to a fatal amount which was stated for the test person. There was a person present who were responsible for the experiment and that could be a contributing factor to why so many of the test people went all the way up to the fatal dose. They were capable of following orders which could lead to death for someone innocent, just like the germans in the second world war. This displayed a side of us which we like to think that our morals would triumph our obedience. Many of us would probably just follow the orders given to us and be a part of the system. We do have an evil and cruel side of ourselves. Dr. Zimbardo also tested this topic, by letting volunteers in to a staged prison divided into to categories; guards and prisoners. The guards were given authority over the prisoners who had done nothing wrong, it could just as well have been them. Here too humanities cruel and evil side came out to play. As the guards with their uniforms and glasses transforms and let their evil side shine, as they start to treat the prisoners very badly and humiliate them. The prisoners are not people anymore to the guards, they have been dehumanized by replacing their name with numbers and so on. Just after a few days the experiment even had to be cancelled as it had gone to far. Perhaps we all have that side of our selves somewhere inside us, some more and other less, maybe it only displays itself in those kind of situations and not in daily

Show More
Related
749 Words | 3 Pages

In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves

Read More
1509 Words | 7 Pages

When those who were classified as the prisoners were arrested it was done unexpectedly to help put them into the mindset psychologists were looking for during the experiment. Off the bat, the people were left clueless and fearful as to what was happening to them. The prisoners were

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

These individuals had to follow their orders and ignore their own moral laws to prevent disobeying the law. This shows how people need to focus more on following their

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

In the process, the guards used ridicule and profanity towards the prisoners in attempts to meet their own role expectations. Among the prisoners rose leaders, one at a time, who stood in opposition to their newly given status and outgroup. In response rebellions, the guards would single out the leaders and punish the whole group (TheAnswerto1984is). This led to a decrease of solidarity between the prisoners and an increase of anomie as well as group conformity. Similar to Zimbardo, Stanley Milgram’s research is relevant to the Stanford prison experiment.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

Even though there are people willing to risk it all to go back to the life they had, there are some that become submissive and stop fighting. In Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Stanford phycology department. They recruited college students to run a mock prison so they could study the effect of becoming a prisoner and a prison guard. In this experiment that was supposed to run for two weeks ended up being stopped by the researchers on the six day because it was getting out of control. This is stated by the heads of the experiment Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, W. Curtis Banks, and David Jaffe in their report of the experiment.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

But rather how ordinary individuals, who thought themselves to be incapable to commit acts of evil, can become the very evil they thought impossible. Subsequently, he constructs the Stanford Prison Experiment as a mean to explain how such factors can effect how someone may go about in the given circumstance, and how the perception for our moral standards can be overcome. As outlined throughout the book, he illustrates how the experiment transpired in a chronological format. As the experiment continued, he uses specific case examples, and allows the audience to take a glimpse into the past, as the dialogue and inner workings of the participants progressed. For instance, he uses the character of Vandy amongst many, as a way to demonstrate how an individual thought to be sympathetic, still choose to abuse his authority, and became harmful to the prisoners.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

The guards that did not agree personally to the torturing of prisoners, but obeyed anyway, were participating in the act of Submissive Obedience, because the conscience they obeyed was not their own. The guards actions can also be explained by Philip G. Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment”. In Zimbardo’s experiment, many young men were given absolute power as guards over prisoners, much like the soldiers at Abu Ghraib. After given few directives and told to enforce the laws of the prison, the guards at the Stanford Prison took only 3 days to

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

The parallels between the Stanford Prison and Abu Ghirab Prison are strong because in both cases because in both cases, people were being humiliated, degraded and dehumanized. Zimbaro explain that in his experiment the scenes from the Abu Ghirab Prison were “interchangeable”. In the Stanford Prison Experiment, healthy men who had clean backgrounds participated in the experiment ad ended up behaving in a way that they themselves could not predict. The similarities also occurred in the Ghirab Prison when the members of the military who lacked a criminal record, and passed the military psychological tests were now found guilty of “dehumanizing, demeaning, innocent” others in a manner that we know as “evil”. For example, when the US soldiers who were seen as good members dehumanized the Arab civilians, the environment had othered them in their minds like what occurred in the video of the Stanford Experiment when the student who became a guard mentioned that he had to speak to himself and think of the prisoners as inferior.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Journey Into Authoritarian Leadership Over the years, scientists, psychologists, and doctors have used social experiments to further their understanding of our surroundings. Social experiments are studies of the human mind and psyche through various environments. In this case, a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment is what opened new doors for the comprehension of human behavior, how we act when we are in power, as well as offered a glimpse into the flaws in our legal system. This experiment was conducted in 1971 in Palo Alto, California.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The experiment mainly focused on the participants appearance, for example prisoners were dressed into prison clothes for feeling more demeaned and humiliated, however at the same time guards were dressed into like real guards with sunglasses for appearing more detached and less humane. The results were terrifying because the guards took the matter seriously and sometimes harassed the prisoners with the help pf physical punishment, or even

Read More
117 Words | 1 Pages

There are different types of bullying that can occur not only in young children but also through life all the way through to adulthood. You have physical, which is when a person causes actual harm to a victim. This could be anything from pushing, hitting, kicking maybe even choking or biting. It can be any kind of violence towards another being, it may also be a threat of violence. This form of bullying is one that is easiest to spot within a school as you are more likely to see evidence.

Read More
1766 Words | 8 Pages

This article explains what is bullying exactly. Bullying is any form of psychological, verbal, or physical abuse that occurs repeatedly among schoolchildren over a period. Statistically, the dominant type of violence is emotional and occurs mostly in the classroom and courtyard of schools. Bullying is a kind of torture, methodical and systematic, in which the aggressor sums up the victim, often with silence, indifference or complicity of other comrades. The author explains some characteristic and consequences of bullying.

Read More

More about Psychological Effects Of Bullying

Related Topics

Open Document