More handpicked essays just for you.
Short and long term effects of deforestation
Short and long term effects of deforestation
Short and long term effects of deforestation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Amazon Rain forest is losing its natural landscape more and more as the loggers who are cutting down trees and removing its importance to the world. Cattle ranchers are also a big problem to the amazon rain forest because they are removing land just for the cattle to have more space. About 20% of the world's fresh air is found coming from the Amazon Rainforest also the environmentalist are helping the Amazon a lot by letting tourist to learn about the rainforest and the donations and money they receive goes to the rain forest so they can help the amazon survive this terrible crime. The Environmentalist want to help by slowing down the clearing of the rainforest.
Native Amazonians have been around longer than writing, they use the forest to survive (food, shelter, etc.) and I like to argue that, yes they are trying to save their forest but they also contribute to deforestation. If we want these people to continue living in their traditional manner in the rainforest and for us not to lose what used to be 14% of our earth’s land surface, we as people need to act and find other ways of surviving without rapid deforestation. To conclude, we know people aren’t doing much to replant trees at the same or faster rate than the deforestation process, based on the rate at which the rain forest has been deforested in the past 55 years, we know we’ve lost about 8% already and so we know we’re going to lose the forest within Forty Years, (no one expected that when they
Since 1978 the Amazon rainforest has had more than 750,000 square kilometers destroyed of trees. The Loggers have contributed to this deforestation by cutting down trees in order to make different things. The Loggers want to use the forest to get wood to make things and to get paid for their job but by cutting down trees they cut down a very important source for many different things. The Loggers need to find new ways to get wood without cutting all of the Amazon rainforest down to make sure the rainforest does not disappear. Two ways they can do that is by cutting down fewer trees and cutting down trees in other places to avoid complete deforestation in the Amazon.
The Native Amazonians want the government to make us the legal owners of our homelands so we can live where we belong, on our own land. Our people have lived in these forests for 12,000 years, and our use of the land and its resources is sustainable. Although some Native Amazonian people live much as we do, others still live much as did their ancestors 12 thousand of years before them. These communities organize their daily lives differently than our culture. Their food, medicines and clothing come primarily from the forest.
Have you ever heard that every year the Amazon Rainforest is losing 78 million acres of land every year? Well it’s sadly true, the reason it’s happening is because of all the jobs in Brazil. That’s what’s hurting it and destroying the Forest, people are trying to do everything to get back the Amazon Rainforest. In 1960 Brazil was the 11th largest economy in the world, everyone in a very populated country can’t be rich.
However, there are some advantages to the deforestation of rainforests. These advantages are: more usable space for growth of both communities and economy- stimulating businesses, the increase in more usable material, the increase in agricultural sites to produce more food for communities, the increase in job openings for farms, plantations, or industry sectors, the grazing of animals, and the increase in revenue across the world as the resources are outsourced to various countries and businesses (17 Important Pros and Cons of Deforestation). A multitude of gains are attained by the loss of these forests that are extremely beneficial to communities. An rapid increase in the world’s population does require an increase in available lands ready
Deforestation is still an unbeleafable issue even to this day. With our trees being cut down to make supplies and furniture, we struggle with keeping our ratio of trees being destroyed and trees being planted equal. It seems like that was also the case in the past. There was a significant amount of trees being cut down in 1920, the land looking much more barren than it did in 1650 (Document A, map). These trees, some of them taking more than three thousand years to rise tall, are being cut down.
As an economics major, we are often trained to believe that real, societal change can only be achieved through a top-down approach. The field of economics, particularly macroeconomics, emphasizes the scale and importance of market mechanisms and government fiscal and monetary policies in addressing societal issues, as well as environmental problems. This perspective creates the belief that significant change can only be attained through large-scale, top-down methods. I, myself, was a strong believer of this mindset. From a young age, I have always been interested in environmental science and have written many research papers and projects on issues such as deforestation and habitat destruction, particularly in the Amazon rainforest.
For example, roads are one of the chief reasons for the deforestation of the Amazonian rainforest. The propensity to build new access roads cause substantial direct effects — such as fragmentation of habitat — and frequently elicit even larger secondary effects, such as colonization, illegal logging, and unsustainable hunting (Finer 6). With the unrelenting latitude and degree of intended mining action, these extortions will only deepen minus any kind of enhanced international strategies. Any new guidelines embraced would have substantial influences one way or another on the area’s biodiversity and the destiny of its native
During 1988-1991, there was a decline in deforestation but, in 1993-1998 there was an increase in deforestation and economic growth. The result of deforestation involved clearing for cattle pasture, commercial agriculture and other activities. In the 1966 to 1975, cattle pasture caused thirty-eight percent of deforestation and now it’s up to sixty percent. According to Latin Times, Brazil saw a rise of twenty-eight percent in deforestation from August of 2012 to July of 2013.
The only basis for the clearing is expansion of road networks and the potential profit to be gained by marketing the resources. The majority of the space created from deforestation went to the construction of extensive roadways such as the Interoceanic Highway (IOH) and its connecting roads between the Atlantic ports in Brazil and the Pacific Ports in Peru. Between the years of the IOH’s construction from 2004 to 2007, there was a substantial increase in forest damage rates throughout that area of Peru, (Oliveira et al 1234) similar to the increased forest-damage Brazil had faced as well. There is a clear link between the rates of deforestation and the rate of economic expansion in the Peruvian Amazon. When looked at in the bigger picture, it comes down to economic and capitalist greed over the health and maintenance of the
Deforestation happens all over the world and for many reasons. The causes of deforestation are quite simple. Some countries go through it as a way to expand their land, create more roadways for travel and transportation, or even as a necessary way to clear out land to produce crops. However, when it comes to deforestation in less developed countries it is typically not a good thing. Honduras being one of the world’s least developed countries is the highest in deforestation as well.
1.1 Overview of Brazil Brazil is one of the largest countries of South America and Latin American region. The country got freedom and became an independent nation in 1822 from the rule of Portugal. Exploiting vast natural resources and a large labour pool, Brazil became Latin America's leading economic power by the 1970s. Being one of the largest and most populous countries in South America, the country has overcome more than half a century of military intervention in the governance of the country to pursue industrial and agricultural growth and development of the interior geographic of the country. Brazil is the world's fifth-largest country, not only by geographical area and but also by population.
1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Deforestation especially in the tropics has been one of the resultant forces of land use change in the world today and its avoidance has not been realized eligible as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in the Marrakesh Accords. Avoidance of deforestation is not yet eligible as CDM activity mainly because of leakage related issues (Kanninen, et al., 2007). Deforestation involves a permanent process of land-use change which could be a result of forests conversion into croplands and pastures. However, the process of deforestation could also be a temporary or partial forest trees removal due to shifting cultivation and selective logging (Moutinho & Scwartzman, 2005) i.e. converting forest from its original course to
Nowadays, environmental degradation has become an important issue. This is because environmental degradation is one of the largest threats that is being looked at in the world today. This is because of the depletion of important resources such as air, water, and soil; the destruction of ecosystems; habitat destruction; the extinction of wildlife; and pollution. To limit the impact of these situations, it is important to know the possible side-effects of environmental degradation. Therefore, there are several causes and negative effects of environmental degradation provided in this essay with some recommendations to prevent it.
