ipl-logo

The Character Of Jedediah Peck During The Revolutionary War

595 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Battle between federalist and anti federalists

Jedediah Peck’s suffering as a soldier during the Revolutionary War made him such a strong believer in democracy and the power of the people. The extreme conditions he experienced with his fellow soldiers furthered his loyalty to the new nation and the people comprising it. In addition more faith in American citizens, fighting against the British encouraged vigilance against possible aristocratic tyranny and sparked a passion to defeat such regimes. Peck’s faith in people of the nation and aversion to aristocrats were greatly solidified during the Revolutionary War, if not created then. Jedediah Peck was drastically different from contemporary politicians at the time, such as William Cooper, largely due to his status. Peck was much poorer than most of the politicians at the time and held only one percent of Cooper’s prosperity; Peck was worth $1,325 while Cooper was worth $131,720. He was also uneducated, apparent in his language for which he was often ridiculed. However, he used that to his advantage, honing a familiar voice that connected better to the common people than the flowery discourse popular among most politicians. In addition to his status, Peck ignored political norms by promoting himself for election and targeting the common people. …show more content…

They opposed the Federalists so intensely because they thought Federalists were trying to reinstate the tyranny of the British. The Federalist ideal of empowering the government, which mostly consists of the elite, supposedly sought to oppress the common people and steal their prosperity. Republicans believed they had to remain vigilant at all times, lest the tyrannical Federal government encroach upon their liberties and destroy the purpose of the

Show More
Related
137 Words | 1 Pages

Gordon S. Wood, “the preeminent historian of the Revolution”, is a well known American historian who has received several awards such as the Pulitzer and Bancroft Prize for his historical books. In his book, The American Revolution: A History, he breaks down the key events based on his experiences and knowledge on the Revolutionary period. Wood was born in Concord, Massachusetts on November 27,1933. Wood teaches at many liberal renowned universities such as Brown, Cambridge, Northwestern , and Harvard. Now being eighty one years old, he recently retired from Brown University and lives in Providence, Rhode Island.

Read More
70 Words | 1 Pages

Polly Cooper was an Oneidas who helped in the revolutionary war. If Polly didn’t go to the troops, with food the troops would have died. She also showed them how to eat the corn so they didn’t die after eating it. If she didn’t show them how to cook the white corn, the war would have played out differently and America may have not been the one we have

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

Each party believed that the other was endangering the Constitution and the American republic. The Democratic-Republicans thought they were saving the nation from monarchy and oppression. They argued, again and again, that the Alien and Sedition Acts supported by the Federalists violated the Bill of Rights. The Federalists thought that the nation was

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

What separated Jedediah Peck from a contemporary such as William Cooper? Although William Cooper did assist Jedediah Peck in his rise to prominence in politics, Peck was nearly the polar opposite of Cooper in terms of financial and social status. At the time of Peck’s emergence in formal politics, Cooper was Otsego County’s wealthiest landlord, who worked his way to riches through speculation. Meanwhile, Peck was an uneducated, frontier jack-of-all-trades, whose property was worth about a hundredth of Cooper’s.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong national government to provide order and protect the rights of the people. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists, which included many patriots, such as Patrick Henry and John Hancock, opposed ratification because the Constitution shifted the balance of power

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The thought that the states should have more power and that the rights of the people should be protected. The leaders of the Anti-Federalists were well know due to the revolutionary war. Other people who supported the well known Anti-Federalists were those who would benefit from an economic and political system less tight than the constitution. These people included Backcountry Baptists and

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

When the United States of America began to fight the Revolutionary War in 1775, they would need a governing body to run the new country. However, seeing as they had just escaped from a tyrannical government under England, the Articles of Confederation gave the states a very large amount of power so that they would not have the same problem again. However, although this government gave many states what they wanted, it was not strong enough to run a country. So, when writing a new Constitution the founding fathers gave more power to the federal government than the states because of the former government.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

There were people known as Loyalists, who took side with the British during the Revolutionary War and Jefferson saw that they too should be rejected. Often times, Loyalists would be tormented and one of the most common ways of torment was stripping a Loyalist of his clothes and placing tar and feathers all over his body (Document 3). To prevent a monarchy from occurring in the United States, individuals and states were given rights, protections, and powers. A central government, Congress, was also given powers; Congress was made up of legislative, executive, and judicial officials. State governments were given every power not given to Congress and no individual man could have special privileges that were not granted to the general public or his own community (Document 7).

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

The Republican’s philosophy was as if they were staring through a looking-glass perceiving the Federalists polices as their attempt to lay the foundation of a monarchical government. From my point of view, when taking into consideration on how our government is structured, provided by a system of checks and balances as well as two political parties all assist in having an alliance alternatively to division. Additionally this suppresses the loyalty on extreme stances which help to accommodate in the compromise on any conflicting points of view. During George Washington’s presidency, some of the national leaders began to have conflicting philosophical principles about how the government needed to conduct its business. It caused some members

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

The fact that some members of the Democratic-Republican party had shown support for the French Revolution led the Federalists to fear that the Democratic-Republicans represented a danger to the government.

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

A Anti-Federalists point of view is extremely different from a Federalists point of view. Anti-Federalists wanted to stay with the British government which at that time in history they were a monarchy. This happened to form a major problem considering the violence already happening between the government and their own people. With a monarchy the people were given no say in what would be happening to their country, while in a Anti-federalists community they were scared that a strong central government would take away their right and freedom. Marcus Junius Brutus shows a bit of dislike for a central government by stating this phrase in article no. 1, section 8, clause 18

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt. , however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

TITLE: The effects of hand hygiene compliance on the increase nosocomial infection rate BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Hand hygiene is stressed heavily as a standard care of practice at the very beginning of nursing school. As we are experiencing clinical for the first time we are highly aware of hand hygiene practices among our colleagues, both good and bad practices. Even though health care workers know that hand hygiene is important I’ve seen a lack of compliance in various clinical settings. I’m curious to know if low compliance affects nosocomial infection rates.

Read More

More about The Character Of Jedediah Peck During The Revolutionary War

Related Topics

Open Document