ipl-logo

What Is The Effect Of The Industrial Revolution In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

1337 Words6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded. Through “The Communist Manifesto” one is able to imagine a conversation between Karl Marx and Adam Smith. One where Karl Marx replies to Adam Smith’s theories on the manufacturing process, wages, and the division of labor with the reality of the proletarians, that Adam Smith disregarded. In this essay, I will argue for the shadow of change that machinery has cast upon laborers and the socioeconomic changes that were triggered as a result of the Industrial Revolution and the shift to machinery in factories .
When reading “The Communist Manifesto” one is …show more content…

As these masters gain power they assert this power by making sure the conditions of proletarians are not improved. Even so, they bourgeoisie work on developing these machines that limit the need and requirement of the craftsmanship of hundreds and thousands of laborers. Laborers are once again dehumanized by the machines as they were by the bourgeoisie, they are but merely slaves to the functioning of these big bulks of metal. They are needed only when the machine malfunctions or requires minimal assistance. Laborers have almost in a way been turned into machines themselves; working day and night in extreme conditions

Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

The growth of the nation has been stunted by the segregation of the business class and the working class. The capitalists claimed their effort to mechanize the manufacturers will provide an advantage to the working class. “Their tasks has become less onerous, the machine doing nearly everything which requires great strength” (Doc F). On the contrary, the workmen felt the continuous movement of the machines was “degrading man

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Because of providing the unprivileged with these jobs, many began to consider the Industrial Revolution a dreadful stage in history. According to the long-term results of the outcomes however, this issue had played an exceptional role during the period of time for three precise reasons. Firstly, modern society greatly advanced in various ways. Secondly, advanced factories in addition to machines were soon to be in the

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

From 1790 to the late 1800’s, the Industrial Revolution recreated industry as Europe knew it with ground-breaking inventions and mass-producing factories. The Industrial Revolution widened the social gap with the bourgeoisie on a pedestal and the proletariat baring the weight of being the work class that would make the Industrial Revolution happen; this strife would lead to many riots and revolutions across Europe as many men like Karl Marx would develop solutions to the proletarian’s problems such as communism. The question arose of how the proletariat were to rebel against the bourgeoisie. The fact was that a revolution was inevitable.

Read More
1595 Words | 7 Pages

Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both address selfishness and its effect on society through social and economic means. In Wealth of Nations, Smith defines wealth as the productivity of a nation and the aspects of a commercial society. “The Communist Manifesto” criticizes the idea behind a capitalist society and talks about the class struggle between the working class and the owners of the means of production. Wealth of Nations and “The Communist Manifesto” both analyze how the selfishness of people affects society, however while Wealth of Nations claims selfishness causes increased productivity and increases wages for all, “The Communist Manifesto” argues that selfishness causes injustice

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The difference in social classes shows how the Marxist analysis approach can be applied to Life in the Iron Mills. Social structure wasn’t always present in society, in fact towards the start of the human race, everyone was actually equal. Sure, there were the hunters and there were the gathers, but they realized they

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the history of capitalism, a central motif has been the progressive cheapening of the labor process as it breaks further into its components. These developments have gone hand in hand with the spread of technology, as machines can more efficiently transform capital into product without the barrier of human limitations. Mechanization can be seen as the next logical step in the evolution of the division of labor, as capitalists move from cheapening labor to replacing it all together. The displacement of workers has great political implications, as insecurity creates great appeal for populist politics. Braverman’s piece Labor and Monopoly Capital centers around the idea of the division of labor.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

The premises presented by Karl Marx on his manuscript were genuinely with accord to the ordeal of the workers as they lose themselves in the hands of the capitalists. But, as we stated in the first part of this paper, we think there is a flaw in his second premise, the estrangement of the worker from the activity production. We believe that labor done by workers - explicitly those who take pleasure in doing their job- doesn’t necessarily imply that everything that they do is not out of their essential being primarily because they love what they do, and any work that is done out of passion and love comes from the essential being of a

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

The Industrial Revolution resulted in many huge changes in society, including a growth in capitalism. The social and political effects have produced a great amount of debate. Andrew Ure, Karl Marx, and Adam Smith all had differing views on industrial capitalism and opinions about what its social consequences would be. Ure’s “The Philosophy of Manufactures,” Marx’s “The Communist Manifesto,” and Smith’s “Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” all portray their perspectives.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

This easily replaceable group of labourers ironically gained an identity and came to be called the proletariat. The word ‘proletariat’ indicated the rise of a new class of people with an internal class structure of the factory. The proletariat lived in urban conditions which were unfavourable. The streets of the cities were dirty and dark with open sewers and no municipalities to manage them and as the cities had mills, the atmosphere was constantly coated in smoke; people lived in hovels and makeshift dwellings with paltry outlets for human waste. As much as the production of goods and the booming economy showed a flashy outlook of city life, the reality of life for the proletariat was murky.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Foundations of Sociology (SOC10010) Mid-Term Essay: Question: ‘’Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.’’ Answer: In this essay I have been asked to discuss three main ideas from the ‘’Communist Manifesto’’, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. To do this I will summarise three main ideas from the text and critically analyse them.

Read More
1837 Words | 8 Pages

Thoughtful analysis of Marx Capital Volume 1, has allowed me to see a number of commonalities and differences in the expressions of class struggle seen in the world today. As a result of expanding global enterprise the struggle between the interests of the worker and the interests of the capitalist can be witnessed at multiple levels of the production process. My experience working in both general manufacturing and food service has provided great insight into the struggle between the employee and the boss on a minute to minute playing field. In the brief period of time I have sold my labor power, I’ve become increasingly aware of the exploitation of the worker as dictated by Capitalism, as well as witnessed it in distinctly different working environments. Understanding Marxian theories in context of the growing industrialization of nineteenth century is undoubtedly important in connecting those concepts to what the worker faces today.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

One of the most important concepts that defined the capitalist economy is the division of labor. Throughout the years, great philosophers such as Adam Smith, Max Weber, and Karl Marx have discussed theories that have drastically changed and molded the modern labor force. Thus, the ideal of labor division was created. Its purpose is to distribute labor skills amongst groups of people and by doing so it enabled workers to build products quickly. From this ideal, it allowed industries to expand their productivity and create trade on a global scale.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

In bourgeoisie society, there is living labor, but it is used to increase collected labour but in a communist society, collected labour exists but it is broadened, improved and shows appreciation and encouragement to the existence of the laborer. Communist robs no man of the authority to apposite the products of civilization. Mark speaks about different divisions of communist and literature. He mentions the reactionary socialism which includes the bourgeois socialists which are individuals who fight against the bourgeoisie society and their development of production. They are against the bourgeoisie because they see their approach of life as a hazard.

Read More

More about What Is The Effect Of The Industrial Revolution In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Related Topics

Open Document