ipl-logo

The Constitution And The Ratification Of The Constitution Of 1787

2632 Words11 Pages

When looking at the British colonies of North America, hallmarks of democracy can be identified. Most colonists self-governed, creating many of the regulations with which their society ran. It is a political democracy. Because of the agricultural focus, many colonists also were self-sufficient within their families and towns, allowing for independence. It is a social democracy. However, these aspects of democracy fall short compared to the injustices and undemocratic aspects of colonial societies. The government system formed by the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was an amalgamation of the best ideas in these colonies and would eventually become the form of democracy we observe in the U.S. today after some ramifications were made. The …show more content…

Those who labor belong to the owner within that state and any hopes of escape would just bring them right back, as the law was on their owner/boss’s side. The article section outlines that there are clear undemocratic elements to the 1787 constitution, but that it laid a firm foundation for what we have today in our constitution and how the U.S. is run as a democracy. The Bill of Rights is in nature the strongest portion of democratic evidence found in the Constitution of 1787, as it details the key principles that people identify with democracy while safeguarding against the monopoly of power. It tips the nature of the Constitution to be democratic enough to not be considered wholly undemocratic. The 1787 US Constitution was pro-slavery for many reasons. The main reason was the three-fifths clause found in Article 1: Section 2 saying “Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned amount the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons.” This caused the slaves to have greater representation in Congress and the Electoral College, which favored the South, which had It gave them more power in Congress despite slaves not being allowed to contribute as individuals in society, but as products to be

Open Document