ipl-logo

The Constitutional Convention: Executive Summary

832 Words4 Pages

The Constitutional Convention was initially an effort to amend the Articles of Confederation, and the purpose of the meeting was to create a whole new government (Shultz, 2014). The Convention was secret and was drawn out through the summer of 1787 (Shultz, 2014). There were many divisions in the preliminary plans and the Virginia Plan, and the New Jersey Plan was the largest (Shultz, 2014). James Madison headed the Virginia Plan's agenda, and the plans he laid out were 1) do away with the Articles of Confederation 2) create two houses within Congress 3) create a government which Congress had the power to veto the actions of the states (Shultz, 2014). He also felt that population would determine membership in Congress and this would give an …show more content…

While this may have angered people, without some control over taxes the United States may have collapsed early.

Divisions formed almost immediately before the ratifications of the Constitution (Shultz, 2014). The Federalist were supporters of the Constitution. The Federalist were in support of a stronger government and felt that a stronger government was better than the confederation of semi-sovereign states (Encyclopedia.com, 2016). The Federalist believed that once the Federal Government had more power the problems with the nation's debt would be handled better (Diffen.com, n.d.).

The anti-federalist was against the ratification of the Constitution and did not want the government to have more control over them (Diffen.com, 2016). They were also against having a president out of fear of tyranny and preferred individual states to handle their affairs (Diffen.com, 2016). They did not feel comfortable with ratifying the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was added (Diffen.com).

By 1795, the two political parties were clearly defined (Shultz, 2014). The democratic- republicans (which consisted mostly of anti-federalist) and the Federalists (Shultz,

Show More
Related

The Constitutional Convention: The Three-Fifths Compromise

1152 Words | 5 Pages

For this purpose, a special convention was held in Philadelphia for delegates to “overhaul” the Articles of Confederation and “render the constitution of the Federal government adequate to the exigencies of the union” (161). During what came to be known as the Constitutional Convention, many issues were debated and

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq

297 Words | 2 Pages

In May 25, 1787, a convention was called in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to express the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, the intention from many delegates was to draft a new constitution; create a new government rather than fix the existing one. Rhode Island was the only one of the 13 original states to refuse to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention. At the Convention, the first issues they had to address was the representation in Congress.

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq

347 Words | 2 Pages

During the Constitutional Convention, in the summer of 1787, several divisions arose among the delegates. There were differences between the northern vs. southern states, merchants vs. farmers, free vs. slave states, large vs. small states, and east vs. west. However, the main division of the Constitutional Convention was the Virginia Plan vs. the New Jersey Plan, essentially the large states vs. small states. The primary objective of the meeting was to somehow find a balance of power without leaving any one group or person with absolute control.

Read More

Similarities Between Checks And Balances

423 Words | 2 Pages

Federalists are folks that agreed with the Constitution while anti-federalists disagreed. The federalists wanted a strong natinal government so the nation could be protected. Anti-federalists thought that a strong executive could become a king and similar to a monarchy. Both sides relied on Virginia's vote to raitfy the Constitution, and little states to follow behind, so it could go into effect. New Hampshire was the final state to vote and the Constitution went into effect, so the people celebrated on a day known as the 4th of July today.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

744 Words | 3 Pages

(This goes before the main argument) The main Argument between the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist was about the amount of control/authority that the government should have. Though the people were now the governing body there was not much protection and liberties that they were entitled to. James Madison did not want to risk the constitution not being ratified; he drafted the Bill of Rights. Even though the Anti-Federalist Failed to prevent the ratification of the U.S. Constitution led to what we know as the Bill of Rights, the ten amendments that protected the

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq

398 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th, 1787 to September 17th, 1787 in the city of Philadelphia. The official purpose of the convention was to amend the articles of Confederation/ how the country was going to be governed. Although the convention had been called for revising the Articles of Confederation, two delegates (James Madison and Alexander Hamilton) wanted to make a totally new government. Seventy delegates from each original state were supposed to come to the Constitutional Convention, but only 55 out of the 70 arrived. The first two months of debating were only about the 15 points of the “Virginia Plan” that James Madison thought of to replace the Articles of Confederation.

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Lead To The Constitutional Convention

490 Words | 2 Pages

The differences between the federalists and the anti-federalists is the federalists like a central government while the anti-federalists like a small weak government. The constitutional convention was held and the federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation while the anti-federalists

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

900 Words | 4 Pages

Whom wanted to push for strong central government that would unite the states as one large continental nation. Federalists attacked the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and articulated their support for the new Constitution. Arguing that it was a necessary improvement on the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION. The country's first attempt at unifying the states in a national political

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

One Of The Plans Presented At The Constitutional Convention

1077 Words | 5 Pages

One of the plans presented at the Constitutional Convention was the Virginia Plan.  Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph presented this plan at the beginning of the Convention. He, George Washington, and the other Virginia delegates came up with this idea while waiting for the Convention to begin.   They came up with the Virginia Plan because the Articles of Confederation had many problems associated with it and the delegates wanted to fix them.

Read More

Constitutional Convention Vs Federalism Dbq

734 Words | 3 Pages

In May of 1787, 55 delegates came to Philadelphia to have a Constitutional Convention. They had this meeting so they could make the U.S. Constitution. They wanted to make one because the articles of the Confederation were not working. They wanted to make a Constitution that would benefit the U.S. The Constitution also guarded against tyranny in 4 different ways, Federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances and big State little State, compromise.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

584 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 brought politicians from different states together in order to create a more complex and centralized form of government. The Virginia Plan was brought forward by James Madison, a representative of Virginia, who wanted to create a more centralized and powerful national government, that would benefit the larger states if it was implemented. The main political dilemma was to construct a central government that would provide the necessary national goods without interfering or endangering the power of the states. Some of the issues discussed at the Convention that were brought forward by the representatives were congressional representation, the appointment of House seats, the national assumption of state debts, the regulation of tariffs and the presidential powers, which were later on incorporated in what is known today as the Constitution.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More

Analysis Of Compromises Made At The Constitutional Convention

1185 Words | 5 Pages

In order for this new government they wanted to change the Articles of Confederation which they had followed under. But this government has gave too much power to the state and federal had barely any say or could control their people which got out of control. The next idea would have to change the articles or either decide to make a new government. Ratifying the constitution had to be approved by all Founding Fathers and also 9 out of the 13 states had to approve of this new government. The federalist became a group of people that were in favor of the constitution and were ready to put into place this new government.

Read More

More about The Constitutional Convention: Executive Summary

Related Topics

Open Document