ipl-logo

The Controversial Trial Of Leopold And Loeb

946 Words4 Pages

Have you ever been in a courtroom and thought about how the court decide if the verdict of the accused party is guilty or not? How can you recognize if there was sufficient evidence to determine if the verdict was just or unjust? How would know if a trial was fair? There are many trials in history to look at. One of Chicago most controversial murder trial, I would have to say, is the trial of Leopold and Loeb in determining if their trial was just or unjust.
When looking at the detailed about this trial let’s examine the background of the defendants. In 1924 Nathan F. Leopold and Richard A. Loeb were charged with kidnapping and murder of 14-year-old victim who was a cousin of Loeb; Bobby franks. They were both sentenced to life imprisonment …show more content…

Over the course of a year the two boys came up with a plan to commit murder just for the thrill of it. In the book “Great American Trials” it’s says in a chapter (“The more they detailed their plan, the stronger their compulsion to carry it out became. In March 1924, according to a report later prepared by leading psychiatrists for their defense, “they decided to get any young boy whom they knew to be of a family, knock him unconscious, take him to a certain culvert, strangle him, dispose of all his clothes, and push the body deep into this funnel-shaped culvert, through which the water flowed, expecting the body to entirely decompose and never be found.” 83-84). After the crime they committed, Leopold and
Loeb sent a ransom note to Frank’s family demanding $10,000 of untraceable bills and stated that
Bobby Frank was unharmed when in all reality, they already murder him.
Leopold and Loeb almost got away with the perfect murder until the next day someone spotted the young Bobby’s body and notified the authority. There was a crucial piece of evidence that one of …show more content…

The people back then believed in an eye for an eye. They believed that they should hang at the gallows but Darrow opposed the death penalty. He felt that he could play
Leopold and Loeb trial to his advantage to show the American people that it was an act of vengeance and had no place in the judicial system. This is supported in Criminal Minds (“Like Crowe, Darrow knew that he might be able to play the trial of Leopold and Loeb to his advantage. Darrow was passionately opposed to the death penalty; he saw it as a barbaric and vengeful punishment that served no purpose except to satisfy the mob. The trial would provide him with the means to persuade the American public that the death penalty had no place in the modern judicial system.”)

I feel like Leopold and Loeb did received a fair and just trial but I think the verdict that was made by Judge John R. Cavalry was not just enough for taking a young boy’s life. The punishment was

Show More
Related
210 Words | 1 Pages

Was Louis Riel’s Trial Just, and Fair? Louis Riel's trial was unjust. The government cheated the justice system to get the outcome they wanted. Even though Riel was mentally unstable, his cause was justified.

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

Joseph Kindler was convicted of murder in Pennsylvania in 1982. After robbing a music store and the police caught his accomplice who ratted him out, Kindler was seeking revenge. He went and found his former accomplice and beat him 20 times with a baseball bat and shocked him 5 times with an electric rod, then took him to a bridge, tied a cinder block to his neck and threw him into the river. The state jury's recommendation was the death penalty and Kindler was going to appeal but he escaped to Canada so the court dismissed his post verdict motions. When Canadian authorities captured him for burglary in Canada they were going to convict him but he was able to flee.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The death sentence was simple and utterly based off of the crimes he committed and not his

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

In 1924, 2 young teenagers named Nathan Leopold, Jr. and Richard Loeb have committed a shocking crime at that time by kidnapping and murder one 14 years old boy. Since they both came from a wealthy family, the criminal cases have caught the eyes of many. Leopold and Loeb planned to do a perfect crime. After much plotting and planning, they decided to kidnapped 14 years old Bobby Franks as he walked home from school one day and killed him by strike him in the head with a chisel.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

Others might debate that if they had waited for a true trial, then Billy might not have been hung. This argument does not persuasive. Marshal Law is very clear in its meanings. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. If you kill someone, you must be

Read More
1818 Words | 8 Pages

They were both wealthy teenagers (age 18 and age 19) from the suburbs of Chicago. They spent months determining how they wanted to carry out their plan. On May 21st, 1924, they convinced Bobby Frank to enter their car and then they killed him with a chisel and put his body into a channel. Additionally, they sent a ransom note asking for 10,000 dollars. Leopold’s and Loeb’s parents hired an expensive criminal attorney by the name of Clarence Darrow to defend them.

Read More
1836 Words | 8 Pages

Leopold and Loeb both grew up in very rich families, while also being outworldly smart. They murdered Bobby Franks on May 21, 1924, and it was bloody, and likely painful for young Bobby. At the hearing, Judge John Caverly ruled that life in prison would be a more appropriate consequence for Leopold and Loeb, who will always be remembered as the duo trying to commit the ‘perfect’ murder. Jesus Christ once said, and this will always resonate in our lives, “Thou shalt not

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

The verdict in this case generated an epidemic of outrage throughout the world. I agree with the not-guilty verdict on the murder one and two charges; however, the evidence is not as incontrovertible as some have suggested. I also agree that there was some mischaracterization around the 31 days; yet, to trivialize this behavior as simply immature is inaccurate. The way Casey handled the death was inexcusable.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton was the 42nd president of the United States of America from the year of 1993 to 2001. He was initially named William Jefferson Blythe on the day of his birth on 19 August, 1946 in Hope, Arkansas, but changed surnames after his mother remarried four years later. He studied law in Yale Law School where he met his wife, Hilary Clinton. Prior to his election as president, Clinton was the State’s Attorney General from 1977 to 1979, and was the Governor of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981 and 1983 to 1991.

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

The medieval times were very barbaric times beginning in 500 CE and continuing to 1500CE. In the medieval era, there were many different forms of punishments such as ‘The rack’, ‘the iron balls’ and ‘quartering’. During this era, there were also many ferocious means of determining guilt or innocence such as ‘trial by ordeal’ and ‘the judicial duel’. In medieval times, determining guilt or innocence experienced several changes and several continuities.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The Nuremburg Trials In 1933, Adolf Hitler and his Nazi government implemented policies to persecute German-Jewish people and others who they considered enemies of the Nazi party. Over the next ten years over six million European Jews and an estimated four to six million non-Jews were murdered. In 1943, the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union and other countries formed allies to bring justice to the ones who were responsible for these killings. Winston Churchill of Great Britain, Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and President Roosevelt were leaders of the allied nations who wanting to punish the Nazi leaders for their inhumane involvement in the Holocaust.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Killing them means that evidence will not matter if shown to the public. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 1461 executions in the United States since 1976. If the 4.1% wrongfully convicted rate stands true, this means that 59 of those 1461 executions involved an innocent person. Dexter’s way of acting so hastily with killing says that the death penalty does not need to be

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Darrow creates a lasting mental impression and invokes fear through his use of graphic imagery and word repetition. The transition from guilt to fear drills deeper into their emotions . During the Scopes Trial, where a man was condemned for teaching evolution, Darrow defends science over religion, as he states that: If today you can take...evolution and make it a crime to teach it in the public school, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools, and the next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. Soon you may set Catholic against Protestant and Protestant against Protestant… (“Attorney for the Damned”187).

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

There was a case in 1993, were Westley Allan Dodd, a child rapist and murderer demanded to be killed, hanged publically and the community did what he was asking for. They put a rope around his throat, tied his hands together, and hanged him in front of a crow of cheering people. Later one many experts said that Dodd was a psychopath that wanted to be remember, he manipulated the community to complied his desire. Equally important we have all the cases in which innocent people have been misjudged. It’s horrible that good people had to be in prison, but it’s even worse that this people are sentenced to die.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

A Perfect Crime, A Perfect Defense On May 21, 1924 Bobby Franks is abducted, and stabbed in the head several times with a chisel. It is the result of seven months of planning a “perfect crime” by nineteen year old Nathan Leopold and eighteen year old Richard Loeb (Leopold and Loeb). These young men were represented in court by Mr. Clarence Darrow, a distinguished attorney known for only losing one out of over a hundred death penalty cases (Clarence Darrow). Fittingly, Leopold and Loeb were facing capital punishment.

Read More

More about The Controversial Trial Of Leopold And Loeb

Related Topics

Open Document