The Crucible Reverend Hale Character Analysis

585 Words3 Pages

The definition of morality is the principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad (Webster 1). In stories, characters have varied moralities like; John Proctor and Judge Danforth, Elizabeth Proctor and Abigail Williams, and Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller uses the characters to show how one's morality can be skewed because of the pressure and influence of society.
John Proctor and Judge Danforth exemplify the difference of innocence in morality. Proctor is a well-liked man who has a distinct personality for himself (C. Lacovetti 1). He is the protagonist whom makes a mistake before the play begins. At the end of the play, Proctor confesses his sins and mends his marriage. On the other hand, Danforth is honest in his own mind and questions Proctor about his actions. Danforth is a judge during the Salem Witch trials and only …show more content…

Hale is a critical, Christian thinker who questions himself on what is right and wrong. He is a person who wants to know and find the truth with evidence. Hale wants to find the truths in the accusations, differently than Parris. In contrast, Parris is the minister of Salem's church who is paranoid about his name in the village. All Parris wants from the trials is land from people who get hanged, instead of the truth behind it all. He is most worried that he will be destroyed because witchcraft is in his family. Luke 6:27-28 says, "But I say to you who hear, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you," (Barker 1550). This is a perfect example of how Hale treated the people of Salem, and the exact opposite of how Parris treated the. Knowing this, it is obvious that Hale for the people in knowing the truth of morality; where as, Parris does not care about the truth but just wants what is best for