ipl-logo

The Crucible: The Difference Between Right And Wrong

602 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Social norms theory

What is a difference between right and wrong? Well, this question is hard to answer. Some people think they are doing the right thing so just keep doing. Some people make crimes everywhere they think is the right thing to do. In fact, they are committing a crime, is wrong in the law. However, they deny there are wrong. So now, the opinion from agreeing and disagree with the statement “The difference between right and wrong is clear.” We have to make it clear. First, right and wrong are the different reason in life, right is right, wrong is wrong. Right and wrong cannot connect together. First of all, before I was not read the story The Crucible, I agree with the statement “The difference between right and wrong is clear” because we need to the right thing instead of the wrong thing. In the society, a lot of people are committing the crime. For example, steal the car, robbery, fighting in the street etc. People who do this crime because they are poor their need money to survive in the city. They think to do this is a right thing, actually there are breaking the law in the city is the wrong thing to do. They are knowingly this is false, they still do it because there are connected right and wrong …show more content…

After I have read the story The Crucible I still chose the agree on opinion because I know that we have to do the right thing no matter what. Equally important, some students are trying to cheat in the test to get the high score or getting the “A+” in their grade. They think to cheat other people word instead of their word to get the high grade is the right thing to do. Since they do not want them, parents, to know that their get the low grade in the class. Again, they are knowingly this the wrong thing to do. Also, it broke the school rule but they keep doing because their want to cover the low grade. So, they connect the right and wrong reason

Show More
Related

The Crucible Comparative Essay

635 Words | 3 Pages

The Puritans arrived in America in the 16th and 17th centuries hoping create a purified version of the church as they believed the Church of England had still had too many components of catholicism. Humans are also invertly evil and this wickedness is displayed throughout many stories. Finally, moral values are also a central conflict to many stories. Puritanism, the evils of all humans, and moral conflict are a central themes to all three of The Crucible, “Young Goodman Brown”, and “The Minister’s Black Veil”. Although these stories are seemingly unrelated stories on the surface however when considering the under-the-surface meanings of these stories many similarities appear including the impact of Puritanism, the wickedness of all humans, and moral conflict.

Read More

Advantages Of Block Scheduling

702 Words | 3 Pages

The traditional school schedule is an 8 Hours a day, consisting of 7 or 8 courses of about 50-55 minutes each. An advantage of traditional scheduling is that educators see all scholars every day which benefits students Ability to retain information that is given. Traditional scheduling also seems to benefit Students with disabilities. In addition to that Students have a greater memory of classroom methods, such as recalling which supplies to bring to class and the due dates of class assignments. Also with traditional scheduling, there is a diversity within classrooms.

Read More

Comparing A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Good Country People

680 Words | 3 Pages

What is morally right, wrong, or in between relies on the individual making the judgment. Concepts of “good” and “bad” are not the same universally. In the stories “A Good Man is Hard to Find” and “Good Country People”, author Flannery O’Connor uses goodness as a theme and utilizes badness to establish the idea of goodness. In most cases, this is not so straightforward. “A Good Man is Hard to Find” has an elusive definition of what a “good man” is.

Read More

The Role Of Logic And Reason In The Crucible

264 Words | 2 Pages

In The Crucible, logic and reason play an active role as the counterpart to the fear that fills the Puritan society and the characters themselves. The characters Proctor and Hale represent the voice of reason against the voices of fear. Though they are outnumbered by those who give in to the paranoia, they stick with what they believe is right despite knowing they will become a pariah. On the other hand, Danforth and Parris represent the driving forces of fear and paranoia that plagues the minds of the people in their society. Society’s reaction to their driving force is to comply because to do otherwise is to be an outcast, and to be an outcast could get one killed.

Read More

Who Is Wrong In The Crucible

432 Words | 2 Pages

Is there any way to judge if people are good or not? In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, and perhaps in real life, one of the main problems is deciphering the goodness of people. One cannot tell a sinner from a saint apart, as every character either has excessive pride, sinful witchcraft, or terrible lies. However, the play heavily applies, however unnapparent by the reader, that certain people who commit sin are less guilty than others, especially those who don not understsand they are wrong. The theme that only people who fully understand the situation at hand can be morally judged is proven through Proctor’s fair moral outlook in the story and Parris’s who does wrong in contrast to Danforth who looks righteous in the story despite all the wrong he does, because he does not know, and .

Read More

Flaws In The Crucible

381 Words | 2 Pages

The Crux of The Crucible In life there aren 't many things that are certain. The one thing that you can always count on is the ever precedent flaws of man. The characters, and the actual people they are designed after, in Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, show us what we as humans are like at our worst. Miller, creator of the movie and play, “The Crucible” made a story based on the true events of what happened in Salem during the years of 1692 to 1693. The book follows a set of about five characters.

Read More

Unjust In The Crucible

263 Words | 2 Pages

First of all, Danforth used various court techniques that were unjust in the eyes of most of the people in Salem. He created his own way of controlling the courts that was different from the rest of the colonies. For example, Danforth believed in the idea of guilty until proven innocent, which is the opposite of what it is today. He believes that if a person is accused then they are guilty until there is evidence to prove their innocence. Today, people are innocent until proven guilty.

Read More

Mistakes In The Crucible

783 Words | 4 Pages

The crime and the cover-up, we see it all over T.V. shows and movies nowadays. Likewise, in The Crucible by Arthur Miller, people, out of fear, shame, or pride will perpetuate and defend their mistakes. In The Crucible, many of the young girls in their puritan society begin to accuse other members of the town of witchcraft. The town nearly loses its sanity as more and more people begin to lie and cover their tracks. This theme is illustrated through the surreptitiousness of the judges, Elizabeth Proctor, and Abigail Williams.

Read More

The Role Of Power In The Crucible

879 Words | 4 Pages

Despite their deeply religious values, the members of the Puritan Society in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible are equally as sinful as the rest of the world. The Puritans, known for turning to God when given any matter at hand, lay blame on the Devil, regardless of their contradictory values. By blaming on him for their wrongdoings, the Devil earns power through the Puritans restoring to involve him whenever any one thing goes wrong. Power is defined by one’s reputation, status, wealth, gender, and age; although the natural deciding factor of one’s power in the Puritan society is land, the Devil himself holds ultimate power. Despite the fact that he does not appear as a human figure, he controls the thoughts and actions of the Puritan society, serving as the ultimate threat.

Read More

The Crucible: Are You Now Or Were You Ever?

764 Words | 4 Pages

The Crucible, is a story of mayhem, deceits, and riot. It is a classic example of how lust and vengeance affects the reality in which we find ourselves in. In The Crucible, the desire for revenge and the resulting spreading panic led to many innocent deaths. It is written to mirror a world where the fear of communism is so widespread - that citizens are arrested on no-solid grounds, and the disruption of daily life and death are prevalent. In short it is a clear example of McCarthyism – or making accusations without the proper regard for evidence.

Read More

The Crucible Argument

559 Words | 3 Pages

Argumentative Essay: The Crucible John Proctor was a strong-loved man. Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in the 1950s to compare the events happening in The Crucible to the real Red Scare. In The Crucible, I believe John Proctor could have ended the mass hysteria in Salem by telling the truth about his sins sooner. He could have never gotten close to Abigail and had a stronger voice against the accusations. John Proctor could have ended the mass hysteria in many ways.

Read More

Human Nature In The Crucible

845 Words | 4 Pages

When push comes to shove, everyone makes a tough decision, but in the end the decision was either out of fear to protect themselves, or a strategy to gain a designated amount of authority. In today 's society, many of the decisions people make lead to riots in the streets and people getting hurt. Similarly, the Ferguson riot in Missouri years ago, where many civilians were injured because of decisions made by everyone involved. Whether it turned violent because they wanted to prove something or because they feared the police when they showed up. In the story, The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, the characters also illustrate the fact that it is human nature to defend oneself, to strive to survive despite the harm such actions can cause to

Read More

The Crucible

775 Words | 4 Pages

Good afternoon teachers and fellow peers, In order to achieve their own personal and communal ambitions, figures in society manipulate and persuade people through events and situations to conform to their own political agenda. In the 1955 prescribed text, “The Crucible,” playwright Arthur Miller establishes the exploitative behaviour of characters through dramatised staging features. Similarly in the 1964 related text, “The Times They are A-Changin’,” Bob Dylan insights individual ambitions through musical and poetic devices. The shared ideas of the modernist era such as the significance of religion and political hegemony are investigated by both composers in their perspective texts.

Read More

Moral Values In The Crucible

1788 Words | 8 Pages

How do the Values and Morals that individuals choose to uphold help define personal identity and also affect the wider community? The Values and Morals upheld by Individuals within the progression of the play The Crucible allows for a further understanding of the individuals personal identity, and consequently affects the relationships of these Individuals. The values and morals of an individual determine how they’ll react to a situation as the play progresses, whilst the personal identity of an individual is the personality, and roles within the community that the individual associates himself with. The perception of individuals by the community of Salem is heavily reliant upon the shared understanding of the values and morals of individuals

Read More

Ethics: The Importance Of Ethics In Our Society

1024 Words | 5 Pages

We are taught the difference between the right and wrong since our childhood but are always told that the lying and cheating always makes things difficult but when students go to school and college they are faced with different dilemma as then the cheating seems to be the easier way to get good grades. They do not really see cheating as the wrong way of doing things they see it as an easy way of doing things .They do not even consider it as an unethical thing because they have been taught that to do the right thing is the easy way .They are taught that the right path and the ethical path is always the easy one but in reality that is not true. The ethical and right path is difficult and complex as J.K.Rowling has said, “Sometimes we must choose between what is right and what is easy.”

Read More

More about The Crucible: The Difference Between Right And Wrong

Related Topics

Open Document