There may be many conclusions to what message is conveyed in the story, however; one strong message that could be noticed is how suffering is not in our hands, and our actions can proceed further results. “The Deer at Providencia” by Annie Dillard is an essay about the author visiting a village called Providencia, noticing the struggle of a tied deer and reads a clip about a burnt man named Alan McDonald and his insights in life. The two different situations connect the author’s thoughts to conclude a message. These following reasons take in evidence to prove this interpreted statement.
One piece of evidence that supports the reasoning is told on lines 20-24 stating, “Trying to paw itself free of the rope, the deer had scratched its own neck with its hooves. The raw underside of its neck showed red stripes and some bruises bleeding inside the muscles. Now three of its feet were hooked in the rope under its jaw. It could not stand, of course, on one leg,
…show more content…
It could be as simple as an “I think” statement or an in depth message that connects all the texts of the book. In “The Deer at Providencia”, Annie Dillard writes about two stories and her overall judgement. The texts certainly support the message of how Annie Dillard believes suffering isn't one to be controlled by and the actions we are indicated through in progress. The actions that the deer and Alan McDonald could have been thought to be a way they persevered in survival or the consequences to their unawareness of reality. In addition, all three reasons summarize ways to think about struggle. The deer was captivated by the rope, Alan McDonald survived in extreme measures of pain, and Annie Dillard had the sense of this was “the big time” to have change, for their reality was in the matter of misery. During interpretations, there is no one correct message, but clearly this is one of the accurate statements found by acceptable evidence from the