ipl-logo

The Dilemmas Of Hamilton And Alexander Hamilton

1142 Words5 Pages

In our government, power is organized with 3 branches, the branches are, legislative, judicial, and executive. A dilemma around presidential power during the ratification of the Constitution is the debate around who should choose the president.

Patrick Henry was a anti federalist, Henry was one of the founding fathers of America. Patrick Henry thought that the government should be strict and careful with who they choose. From The Patrick Henry Speech Excerpt, the document shows Henry’s thoughts on the presidency. - “A leader is dishonest, and also ambitious and clever, Then He will make the military loyal to him instead of to the country and the people.” This shows that Henry is slightly hesitant to go through with the new idea. Alexander …show more content…

Hamilton was also a founding father of America. Hamilton was pushing the idea of the people electing the president and wanted it to happen. From Alexander Hamilton, “Federalist 69”, The Federalist Papers: 1788, Hamilton expresses his thought that the president should be elected by the people. The document says -“The President of the United States would be an officer elected by the people for four years” This is showing that Hamilton believes in the idea that the president needs to be elected by the people of America. This dilemma was important because the fact that the people choose the president is still relevant today. This was a big decision and changed politics forever, this gave everyone who voted a voice. The President does not have too much power because the president’s powers are limited by the other branches of goverment. The change and action that the president of the US wants to make are limited by the branches of government. Document C discusses the powers that are not in the presidents control, and I believe that it 100% should be. The Document states: “Excerpts from the U.S. Constitution the subject of what powers the president does not have which are the powers that the goverment has control of were discussed. There are so many powers that the goverment has and the president does not have any control of. The article states - “The House of Representatives shall… have the sole Power of Impeachment… The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments… no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States…” I believe that the president should have control for at least some of this. When the people of the United States vote for president, they are voting

Show More
Related
1289 Words | 6 Pages

Following the ratification of the United States’ Constitution, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison compiled a list of letters to provide more information to the American public. These letters, also known as the Federalist Papers, detail the specifics regarding branches of government, status of citizenship, and the democratic role of the people.  Federalist Paper No. 67, titled the Executive Department and written by Alexander Hamilton, focuses on the powers of the executive branch and calms the fears of the doubtful citizens. In addition, it provides information on the executive branch’s responsibilities and ways to increase the overall effectiveness of running an admirable government for the newly-independent United States of America.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

Even with certain restrictions and checks of power the president still maintain some significant areas of power over congress such the ability to veto legislation passed by congress. This ability grants the president a significant amount of power over the legislative process in the U.S as ultimately he is able to set the agenda of the country’s political schedule, and determine the direction of the country’s political schedule. Along with the ability to enact vetoes without the interference of a hostile congress uncooperative congress. The president also posses the ability to set the agenda for what legislation to recommend to congress and to what priority level each recommendation should be given. This power does come with its limits though as most situations do not give the president the ultimate authority to force congress to address his proposal and he must instead convince congress to address his issue with priority.

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

As our nation first formed, there was much concern about the role of our nation’s leader and how powerful they should be. When the Articles of Confederation were written in 1781, it did not provide for an executive branch. In 1787, at the first Constitutional convention, the delegates agreed that there had to be an executive branch which would be separate from the legislative branch. They felt this would avoid any corruption and would provide for checks and balances to prevent dictatorial rule by this branch of government. Though small, the executive branch plays a crucial role in running the United States.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

In George Washington’s Farewell Address (1796), the departing president warned that the creation of political factions, would most certainly lead to “formal and permanent despotism” for the United States, of which he was clearly right. Despite Washington’s words of warning, two of his closest advisors, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, helped to form the factions that led to the dual party system under which the U.S. operates today. Hamilton and Jefferson came to represent the divisions that shaped the early national political landscape, for they had polar opposite views on how the Constitution of the United States should allow, and support, their vision of how the government should be run. Jefferson took a strong position against the creation of a large, central federal government that got itself involved in domestic affairs. According to Jefferson, the role of government should be small and more direct to local citizens, in order to keep the new republic from returning to a tyrannical monarchy.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

I agree with the Supreme Court on placing emphasizes on keeping the presidential power in check but respecting the doctrine of separation of powers. The Court has the power to hear cases that involve federal questions because the

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution that the framers desired is drastically different than what it represents within a modern-day presidency. This essay’s main focus is on why the framers would not support the modern presidency, and a real-world example, from the modern presidency, which the framers would dislike. The framers of the Constitution did not want the president to be influenced by any outside sources, which include the demands of the people. However, the modern president responds to the popular demands of the people. The modern-day president is usually influenced by majority public opinion.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander Hamilton (2004) is a detailed true story of one of the most important figures in American history. It is based on Hamilton’s early life. As a politician, as a revolutionary war hero, and the first treasury secretary, Hamilton dedicated his life and intellect to unifying and strengthening the United States. Hamilton in truth did perhaps more than any other one person to secure the power of the American Union. Though he was never president, he was a hero deemed as a true founding father, title he kept till his death.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Who is Alexander Hamilton? He is a founding father who isn’t really in your average history book. He isn’t even from our country yet he still didn’t care. The major parts of his life were his childhood, the revolution, and then what happened after the war. Hamilton’s childhood played a big part in his life.

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander Hamilton took a stand for his country by writing the Federalist essays, which encouraged the ratification of the U.S. constitution. During the early times of his life, Hamilton faced many challenges and took many opportunities. Hamilton was born in, according

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Hamilton realized something while working as George Washington’s advisor. He realized that the states had a lot of resentment and hate for each other and he believed that it was from The Articles of Confederation. He left his advisor spot in 1782 and focused more on establishing a strong central

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

“Alexander Hamilton, a delegate to the Constitutional Convention and major author of the Federalist papers, was the United States' first secretary of the treasury” (Biography.com). From the Revolutionary War to his fatal death, Alexander Hamilton did many things throughout his life and is one of the many people that helped develop the first political party called the Federalists. All of this began on January 11th, on the island of Nevis, in the British West Indies, when Alexander Hamilton was born. The exact year of Alexander’s birth is unknown, but it is estimated that he was born in either 1755 or 1757. He was the result of an affair with his mother, Rachel Fawcett Lavine, and a Scottish trader that soon abandoned them.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

While a literary device, tragic heroes also appear in real life. A perfect example of a real life tragic hero is Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury. This modern tragic hero started life as an orphan in poverty, living in the Caribbean, but his elevated character of exceptional literary skills, wit and progressive political ideas eventually landed him a spot as one of the most influential people in the United States. Alexander Hamilton had a positive hamartia, as he refused to remain quiet about the injustices of his country, oblivious to the danger it created for him and his family. The downfall of Hamilton occurred gradually.

Read More
1725 Words | 7 Pages

Many are taking a gander at an approach to change the framework and others might want to get rid of the framework Understanding the variables that justified the formation of the framework is fundamental. At the point when the constitution was being made, the designers needed to abstain from making a solid official branch. One thought the designers made was to have congress straightforwardly pick the president. Be that as it may, the thought was rejected on the grounds that some felt that settling on this decision would be excessively troublesome and leave ill will in

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your post because I do think that our founding father would not agree on the expansion of powers of the president. The three branches of our government was created by our founding father in order to balance out the power of the president, so that neither one branch can have too much power over the nation. When they crafted this idea they had seen other country where there is only one prime minister (North Korea and Russia for example) that overseen every action of a nation which the power was too powerful and decision making can be challenging for the citizens when they cannot vote on new law and regulation.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

“The president 's power is felt all over the world.” No nation is so remote from the U.S. that they can avoid the repercussions of American diplomacy. The president can abuse their powers and it will affect the U.S as well as other countries that associate with us. “The formal powers as listed in the Constitution say little about a modern president 's real power.” Modern presidents have way more power than was is listed in the constitution, they do not have to follow the guidelines completely like past presidents would have had to.

Read More

More about The Dilemmas Of Hamilton And Alexander Hamilton

Related Topics

Open Document