ipl-logo

The Erlich Coker's Murder Case

751 Words4 Pages

At the time, Erlich Coker was already serving time for multiple sentences including aggravated assault, kidnapping, rape, and murder, because he had raped and stabbed a young woman to death just a few years earlier on December 5, 1971. However, Coker escaped from the Ware Correctional Institution in Georgia in September of 1974. Coker proceeded to break into Georgia couple Allen and Elnita Carver’s home.
The couple was threatened, and Mr. Carver was tied up, leaving Coker to steal money and the couple’s car.. Coker then forced Mrs. Carver into the car with a knife and raped her. Afterwards, Mr. Carver managed to escape and called the police. Mrs. Carver was still alive and not harmed after being kidnapped and raped by Coker. Coker was then …show more content…

The Superior Court decided that Coker should be sentenced to death. Coker then appealed to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which also affirmed and sentenced Coker to the death penalty on the rape charge.
The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld the death sentence because the rape was committed during an armed robbery (a capital felony), and by someone with previous sententences. Coker appealed again, and the case headed to the US Supreme Court.
In a 7-2 conclusion, the Supreme Court ruled that recieving a death sentence for raping a woman was a “grossly disproportionate” punishment and that the death sentence enforced should be reversed and overturned.
Because the rape did not involve murder, the Court decided that the death penalty was disproportionate and unreasonable punishment, therefore being considered unconstitutional (cruel and unusual …show more content…

This is mainly because during this whole incident, Coker had just escaped from prison while serving multiple sentences and capital offenses, including murder, which, according to the Supreme Court, validates a death sentence. Furthermore, the state of Georgia’s laws mentions that rape can be punishable by death if it also occurred with or during a capital felony. Both instances were present because of Coker’s previous capital convictions, and the fact that the rape happened during an armed robbery since Coker stole the Carver’s car and threatened them with a knife. One could argue that what was really “grossly disproportionate” was the Justices’ decision and lack of common sense in this particular case. As stated by Justice Rehnquist, rape is not a minor or unimportant crime that can be overlooked, as it leaves vicitms with serious trauma and difficulties. In fact, rape should’ve been considered a capital crime in this instance. I believe that the supreme Court was completely wrong in their decision to overturn Coker’s death sentence. Because of this, I would have agreed with the lower court's’ decision, and ruled that Coker should have been sentenced to

Show More
Related
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court decided that the actual acted of the death wasn’t unconstitutional “but that the procedures and applications as practices by the States were.” ("Supreme Court Cases.") The original ruling was overturned and William Furman would not be executed. The court in the case explained that only way capital punishment would be eligible is if they could form a uniform policy. Without a uniform policy, the death penalty will be considered as a cruel and unusual punishment.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The decision was per curiam, which means it was a unanimous decision. A. Rule(s): 1. LSA–R.S. 14:30.1, 14:130.1- Second Degree Murder 2. U.S.C.A. Const. Amend.

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

Eric Smith at the age of thirteen tortured and murdered a four year old child named Derrick Robie at a nearby woods. Eric was sentenced to nine years to life in prison. Eric was convicted for second degree murder. His reasoning for the murder was because Eric just wanted to see someone being hurt rather than him. The Robie family were suffering knowing one day he will be released back into society.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Since he was a minor and should not be tried as an adult. In November 1932, due process was denied since the young men were not given the right to adequate counsel in the original trial. Later, Ruby Bates took back her testimony and testified for the defense. And proved that the rape did not happen. But yet another all-white male jury still recommended the death penalty.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

The court cases were rushed through and they were all sentenced to death. The boys lawyers barely defended them and merely showed up. This violated the due process of law (14th

Read More
1462 Words | 6 Pages

With this story it looked as though it was self defense and that all charges were going to be dropped or so the citizens of Savannah thought. Nobody knew the severity of the charges until Spencer Lawton, the plaintiff's lawyer, presented his evidence in a secret session with the grand jury. Five days before the hearing was set to take place, “

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Thornton has a valid point. While it is nice that Tucker was able to change, she was still a murder who killed two innocent people just for fun. Anyone who says they have received “sexual gratification” from murdering people should not then have their life saved just because they have found God (Clarkprosecutor). Being a good person or having religious faith didn’t save Tucker’s victims, so it should not be a factor in trying to save her from the death penalty. If Tucker had not been executed, it would not have been fair to the victims’ families that their loved ones were taken from them by a woman claimed to have found sexual gratification while killing people, and yet Tucker was still allowed to

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Marvin Anderson was convicted, by an all white jury, to 210 years in prison. In 1988, John came forward confessed, and gave details of the crime, but the judge didn’t change the decision for Marvin. It was also noted that the rape kit, used in the case was destroyed. Marvin also requested DNA tests, but that was also denied. When the Innocence Project became involved in 2001, access to DNA testing was won for Marvin.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Christopher Simmons killed this innocent woman and more punishment should have been given than what was. Simmons will sit in prison thinking that he got away with it. This does not set a good example for the younger generation, that if you want to murder someone then you can and you don't receive the death penalty, but jail for life. The death penalty was legal for minors in the State of Missouri, the death penalty was a fair punishment for Christopher Simmons and would have been the wisest punishment to give. No mercy should have been given to Simmons on this action.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

In 1874, Ehrlich Coker was serving multiple life sentences in Georgia for rape, murder, assault, and kidnapping. On September 2, 1974, Coker escaped from prison (ProCon, n.d.). Around 11:00 pm Coker broke into the house of Allen and Elnita Carver through an unlocked kitchen door (Brody & Acker, 2010). Coker tied up Allen Carver, took a knife from the kitchen and threatened Allen Carver stating “you know what’s going to happen to you if you try anything, don’t you.” Coker took Allen Carver’s money and his car keys.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

I was also surprised that Dr.Tuttle down right killed Bill instead of just fighting him off or getting away. I had not thought much about how a victim might act after fighting off an assaliant, I never considered the psychological trauma that might be incureded even when successfully fighting off an assailant. The Accused sheds a new light on how a victum might act after such a traumatic experience with Dr.Tuttle unnecessarily hiding and sabotaging the invenstigation despite her only acting in self defense. I believe that within the context of The Accused rape is treated fairly legally.

Read More
2954 Words | 12 Pages

After receiving this sentence, the courts decided that they needed to decide whether this was the best punishment for the crimes Coker committed. There were two opinions for this case. First, that the death penalty for his rape conviction was cruel and unusual punishment.

Read More
1613 Words | 7 Pages

It’s weird because people told me that there was no mention of the rape in the trial even though there were a ton of details about it in the published confession. I heard that the jury reached their verdict very quickly. Some said as quick as four minutes, and they found him guilty. It’s not that surprising that they found him guilty, he apparently admitted in his confession where he had hidden the hammer he used to attack Lucy Fryer, and he signed

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

There are ambiguities in the definitions of everything common enough to be defined. The definition of ‘a scratch’ is used liberally by a teenager parking for the first time, as is the definition of ‘noticeable’ when their BFF has a pimple. The way we define a crime as serious as rape shouldn’t be nearly as dubious. As it is, organizations have been vocalizing that same sentiment for forty-two years of the eight decades it took the FBI to change it (Klein 183). The past definition categorizes rape as “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.”

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

The other judges of the House shared the same thoughts with that of their learned and noble friend Lord Keith. They all answered the certified question in the approving and reject the appeal. The case was reviewed by the European court of Human Rights and it was decided that the conviction of the R v R was a breach of article 7 of the European Convention on Human rights, extent to a conviction for an act that wasn’t a criminal offence when committed. The judgement in this case was supported by the Law Commission and was later confirmed in statute law by an amendment to the sexual Offences Act in the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

Read More

More about The Erlich Coker's Murder Case

Related Topics

Open Document