More handpicked essays just for you.
Income and wealth inequality sociology
Income and wealth inequality sociology
Income and wealth inequality sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his speech “Every Man a king” senator Huey Long suggested to reconstruct the wealth in America. He describes the current economic crisis as devastating because 10 people own about 85% of America’s wealth when the rest of the population does not have anything. Some even starve to death. The purpose of his speech is to create the effect of urgency. He wanted to limit the wealth one’s can have.
The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.
At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).
Andrew Carnegie was the one who wrote the Gospel of Wealth and it was a positive idea for the people who are not wealthy. Carnegie says that the upper class has a responsibility to address the issues of the wealth inequality. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie stated that the wealthy class can be a better state than the government or state. Carnegie also states that the wealthy should dispense wealth and it should be a way that does not promote drunkenness. Carnegie argues that there are two types of wealthy people.
Likewise, many wealthy people, including big business leaders, came to realize that it was their role in society was to give back. Due to all the negative responses, people such as Andrew Carnegie were huge philanthropists . They stated that because they were wealthy and were better inclined than most, they should be willing to help those at the bottom. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, explicitly stated how the wealthy have a moral obligation to give back (Outside Evidence). Other major responses to changes and the impact of big business were responses from the government.
His 1889 article “The Gospel of Wealth” urged
The general argument made by Elizabeth Weil in her work “The woman who walked 10,000 miles” is that an explorer should be a person who has struggled throughout their lives, have taken risks and are brave enough to battle against nature. More specifically, Elizabeth Weil 's argues that the difference between Robert Falcon Scott and Sarah Marquis whom are explorers is that Sarah Marquis sets herself up based on her desires and wanting accomplishments not wanting to cause herself troubles and chasing the idea of sufferfest. Elizabeth Weil 's writes “The word explorer suggests a morally superior pioneer, a man or woman who braves the battle against nature to discover terrain implying a self indulgent adrenaline junkie who scares love
Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.
Four hundred American billionaires own two trillion dollars, as much as the one hundred and fifty million Americans on the very bottom. The top one percent of the richest American own one fifth of the nation’s total income. Similar to the Gilded Age, people who do business and live in urban centers earn much more money than who do not. The unprecedented technological innovation cause the production easier and faster, which renders the employers benefits. Also, the economy gives huge advantage to those who control lots of money, causing the economic disparity even deeper and promoting the appearance of the “Robber Barons,” unscrupulous businessmen who achieve monopolies in their
Name Institution Instructor Date According to Andrew Carnegie ‘The gospel of wealth’ (1889), he emphasizes that the biggest problem of our age is wealth administration. There is a distinction flanked by the rich and the poor where the ties of brotherhood bind them together in a pleasant-sounding relationship. Over the past decades, human life has not only changed but revolutionized with a difference, in the former days between the dwelling, food, dressing and environment of the rich and the have-nots.
One of the many Gospel of Wealth advocates was Andrew Carnegie, 1835-1919, who was an industrialist who emigrated from Scotland to American in 1848 (Wall, ANBO). Carnegie’s “Wealth” written in 1889
In this text, he makes a valid argument as to why the rich should administer their own wealth unto those with less fortune. He begins his argument by explaining how wealth has revolutionized the United States. Carnegie mentions how the Sioux chief's wigwam was similar in appearance when compared to the huts of those inferior to him, and then compares this to the differences in economic classes of the 1800s. Carnegie later states how the very definition of wealth has changed throughout the years, where the poorest farmer of the 1860s owns more luxuries than the landlord of just a few years prior. Carnegie includes these two facts because he wants to show how much society has progressed throughout the last few hundred years.
Wealth, poverty, technology, decadence, the Gilded Age was a time of change and uprooting of past systems, schools of thought, and standards. It was a time of both hope and doubt for the majority of the population and brought many to be empty handed or exceedingly wealthy. The dynamic between rich and poor was shifting to a gap of wealth never before seen in the young country. The gilded age’s built up wealth disparity faded away over time. Yet today it seems that a resurgence of these features is rearing its ugly head again.
Wealth and Morals Within The Good Earth Affluence is a curse as much as it is a luxury, for it is often placed above beliefs and merits in society. Opulence can result in overbearing pride, which frequently destroys relationships, resulting in loneliness and dissatisfaction. The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck serves as a realistic representation of how wealth and pride may corrupt one’s values by showing characters’ transformations from modest to arrogant and displaying how a new lifestyle can ruin the peace of a small family.
The Gospel of Wealth was a religious belief that Christians had a responsibility to create an ethically sound and morally upright society. This all started when Protestant minister for example like Josiah Strong began preaching about the Social Gospel The second problem our nation faced was the inequality for women in the workforce and voting. It wasn’t until the Gilded Age were women stepped out of the house and went to work in the factories for the first time.
