Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philip ii reign the golden age of spain
Philip ii reign the golden age of spain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philip ii reign the golden age of spain
Philip ii reign the golden age of spain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philip ii reign the golden age of spain
Since Philip wrote this as a response, he
Alexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.
King Philip was told by the Europeans to give up and put their weapons down. They were told to leave their town. The town destroyed by the Europeans little villages and later control even to bigger town. This became to known to be asking Phillip War. Twentyfive village were destroyed, almost killing twentyfive of phillips men.
It was also his father’s wish that the Macedonian Empire would rule the Persian Empire. Which after he was killed may have been the fuel that started why alexander wanted to conquer
Philip II was an absolute monarch who believed his authority came from God and he tried his best to always bring justice. The first reason that Philip II was the best absolute monarch was because during his reign, Spain was the most powerful nation in Europe. He made Spain powerful by having a strong economy to strengthen his armies. Philip needed a strong
Contrary to popular belief, the young Alexander III of Macedonia was not as amazing as he is often portrayed to be. Alexander was born in 356 BCE and his father (Phillip of Macedonia) actually began the conquering of the large empire Alexander would one day rule. King Philip conquered nearby Greek city-states and had planned to conquer the Persian Empire, but before he was able to complete this attempt he was assassinated. Alexander, in 336 BCE, at the age of 20 years old had become the king of Macedonia. He completed his father’s attack on Persia and died after becoming ill in June of 323 BCE.
(Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Vol. VII, pg 237). Naturally his father and company played off this comment but were astonished to see that Alexander had managed to tame the wild beast. This led Philip to cry out, “‘My son, seek out a kingdom equal to thyself; Macedonia has not room for thee. ’”(Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Vol.
Olympia was involved in a conspiracy to kill Phillip II of Macedon, but only out of necessity. Philip’s isolating marriage left her no other choice but to arrange his death, whether or not she and Alexander had planned it for years. Alexander’s bizarre reaction to his brother’s marriage arrangement illustrate lack of strategy in a strategic man, implying that the scheme was the result of his mother’s presence and the arrival of Cleopatra’s son. In Alexander, Olympia was presented as a conniving and evil wife.
Not everyone goes down in history in a good way, and King Philip II did not. Philip II was the ruler of an extremely large empire, so it wasn't easy for him. He was also an untrusting leader causing him to lack necessary assistance. Philip did not only do bad things though, he was the King of Spain when they reached their peak of power and he helped (and crashed) the Spanish economy. He also performed the great feat of unifying Spain and Portugal, which some say was his greatest accomplishment.
I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
Philip II was the king that transformed Macedonia into a great military power, winning victory after victory on the battlefields throughout the Balkans. After he retired Alexander the Great came into reign. He had defeated many
In Isocrates Address to Philip of Macedonia, he found “that on no other condition could Athens remain at peace, unless the greatest states of Hellas should resolve to put an end to their mutual quarrels and carry the war beyond our borders into Asia...to wrest from the barbarians the advantages which they now think it proper to get for themselves at the expense of the Hellenes” (Isocrates). The barbaric, omnipresent influence of the Persians, which Isocrates and the rest of the Greek world felt was truly responsible for their misfortunes was quickly recognized by Philip as an fruitful opportunity for magnifying his power and authority over Greek affairs. The motivation to punish the Persians for the glory of Greece was not the ultimate goal of Philip as stated by the historian Polybius who perceived that Philip “reckoned on the cowardice and indolence of the Persians…further fixing his eyes on the splendor of the great prizes which the war promised… seizing on the pretext that it was his urgent duty to take vengeance on the Persians for the injurious treatment of the Greeks” (qtd. in Fredericksmeyers). The Persian characterization was powerful in conjuring intense emotions among both Macedonians and Greeks, creating an avenue for
Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.
The Tragedy of Hamlet is amongst the most influential and significant tragedies in English literature. Being one of Shakespeare’s most popular woks and among his most performed, Hamlet raised several symbols and themes that remains partly unsolved as its ambiguity survived to modern times. As a dramatic text, the play conveyed problematic themes through distinguished elements as well as specific modes of representation. This extract, from Scene 5.Act 1, highlights three main elements: context, form and content that not only forge the dramatization of the speech but also foreshadow the coming crucial actions. This paper sheds the light on these three elements to analyse how the relevant extract is dramatized.