ipl-logo

The Importance Of DNA Evidence In Prisons

970 Words4 Pages

The number of DNA Evidence that had wrongly accused inmates was a total of 333 in thirty-seven states (“Exonerated DNA”). Inmates that have committed a crime have to take a DNA test. DNA Evidence will prove whether a convicted person is innocent or guilty. There is many unsolved cases due to the fact that DNA testing did not go the way it was supposed to and screwed up the results. Not taking peoples DNA is a major issue due to the fact that many people are wrongly convicted and are put into prison for a crime they did not commit. Keeping the DNA from inmates who did a crime should be kept because if they commit another crime the police can go back to their DNA and see if it matches the DNA from the crime. DNA Evidence is such a huge impact when it …show more content…

Prisons that are over populated cause inmates to disturb one another causing many problems due to the fact that prisons are rising just by the number of inmates they have. Judges who walk through prisons often find that they are roughly crowded, they say that if prisons have too many prisoners they should lower the sentencing of an inmate. An increased amount of cellmates can become a threat to the prison employees and prisoners themselves. Inmates can cause fights and riots which may result in hurting others, including guards. Sometimes, death is an inevitable outcome. Keeping and saving the DNA of an inmate is helpful after they are released. Once a prisoner is released, the prisoner does not guarantee that they will behave and will not commit another crime. 2 out 3 people who serve time in prison never come back, and 11 percent come back multiple times (Neyfakh). The fact that many inmates still commit crimes after they are released, prisons should keep their DNA so when they commit a crime they know for sure the prisoner was the one who did the

Show More
Related
1964 Words | 8 Pages

The Department of Justice says, "States began passing laws requiring offenders convicted of certain offenses to provide DNA samples. " That DNA evidence can help convict someone of a crime and it helps to uncover more things about the crime itself. Investigators have been using forensic science to help them solve cases since before the 90 's, mostly fingerprints that were found at the crime scenes and on the victims (O 'Brien). DNA evidence has solved countless cases including ones that happened over a prolonged period of time because of the technological advancements there is

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

Before the advancements in science and DNA discovery, there have been many men and woman executed for a crime he/ she did not commite. After DNA was discovered there have been cases where DNA has exonerated date row inmates. If DNA wasn't discovered many men and women would have been executed and if DNA testing was available earlier it would have easily proven that Cameron Todd Willingham, Corsicana, Texas was innocent.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Alan Crotzer—DNA Exoneration In the United States, there have been a total of 321 DNA exonerations to date, with twenty of these exonerees having served time on death row (“The Innocence Project,” n.d.). Alan Crotzer was not one of these twenty, however he was sentenced to 130 years in prison for a crime that he didn’t commit. Charged and convicted of sexual battery, kidnapping, burglary, aggravated assault, robbery, and attempted robbery, it wasn’t until 24.5 years later, on January 23, 2006, that Crotzer was released from prison after post-conviction DNA testing proved his innocence (“The Innocence Project,” n.d.).

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

It is a great technological innovation that can help bring evidences and fact faster. In the article The DNA Wars Are Over, “Forensic use of DNA technology in criminal cases began in 1986… In one of the first uses of DNA in a criminal case in the United States, in November 1987.” Sadly in 1985, DNA testing was not popular in the U.S. investigation and was not available in Cole’s case. I believe the U.S. court system is improving and yes there are a lot mistrials and wrongful conviction cases, but you cannot avoid the fact that DNA testing can bring better truth than just relying on statements of both

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

For example, Maryland believed that DNA analysis helps to identify suspects more accurately and reduce future crimes, which would boost the public's confidence in law enforcement. The State even claimed that without the DNA Collection Act, which enabled the police to cheek swab from King, they would not have connected King to the sexual assault that he was ultimately accused of. Nevertheless, there is a risk in allowing Maryland to enforce its DNA Act for the purpose of only removing violent offenders. King actually acknowledges that DNA collection is beneficial because arrestees are more likely to have committed other crimes but hypothesizes that this logic can also be applied for other subgroups as well. For instance, young men, residents of particular neighborhoods, individuals from particular socioeconomic or educational backgrounds, or any other group that has a high incidence of criminal activity can be accused.

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

An absurd amount of innocent people in the nation, have fallen victim to a disorganized legal system, and are suffering because of it. Dennis Brown, and James Harden, are two examples of this, and can relate because of it. They’ve been falsely convicted, without DNA evidence, but the truth of the case is finally revealed with their release. Dennis Brown, a black male from Louisiana, has been one of many people that have been wrongfully convicted without proper DNA evidence. First off, he’s been falsely convicted of rape and burglary.

Read More
2295 Words | 10 Pages

The impact of Tim’s case was also felt on a national and even international level, as it shed light on the importance of using accurate and scientific evidence in the legal system and the need to reform the criminal justice system to prevent wrongful convictions. Tim’s story has inspired many other cases to be re-opened and re-examined, leading to the exoneration of several other innocent individuals. Overall, the case of Tim Cole has had a profound impact on the criminal justice system and has helped to bring about important changes in the use of DNA

Read More
1726 Words | 7 Pages

In the lab report three students are tested along with one suspect. Student number two’s DNA matched the suspects DNA. The student’s DNA’s are cut with five different enzymes as well as the suspects DNA. Student two’s DNA matched exactly with the suspects DNA; the other two student’s DNA did not resemble the suspects DNA at all. (Choi, et al, 2008) DNA fingerprinting is used a lot in determining who committed a crime.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

In King, Justice Kennedy referred to the invention of DNA technology as “one of the most significant scientific advancements of our era.” This statement has been criticized, but the impact of DNA technology has been significant. Currently, forensic analysts can use “junk” DNA to identify a person with near certainty. Law enforcement can collect a person’s DNA through saliva. The sample is then uploaded to CODIS, a national network of DNA databases.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

DNA evidence has also helped let off wrongfully convicted individuals. However, there are limitations to DNA evidence, such as possible contamination or degradation of evidence over

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

While there are many arguments out there as to why an individual who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime should have his or her DNA collected, we must not only look at the practicality of this, but also the facts. A law of this magnitude could open the flood gates to a massive invasion of privacy. Many supporters of this law claim oftentimes misdemeanor convicts go on to commit more serious crimes, so having their DNA in the system will help identify them sooner if they commit a crime. This invasion of privacy not only assumes that a misdemeanor convict will become a serious convict in the future,

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

When convict individuals for criminal acts and making sure the right person is captured it may be best for law officials to use DNA evidence that would exonerate wrongfully-convictions. In recent years there has been great advancements in technology that would allow investigators to use when trying to prove evidence on individuals who are sitting on death row. Citizens have also, made great efforts ensuring innocent people are not convicted for crimes they did not commit. According, to the Equal Justice in 1973, there were at least 156 people released from the criminal justice system for being wrongfully convicted. When innocent people are wrongfully convicted it not only take away many years of their lives, and causing hurt to the victim’s

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

This could be fatal because then a person could be wrongly convicted of a crime or even let free if he committed the crime and who knows if he won’t do it again? ● The equipment used in forensic testing can be very expensive and will cost a lot of money. ● Misleading or false DNA can easily be placed at the crime scene. As a result the wrong person will be arrested and the people who actually committed is still running around free. ● The DNA information is on a computer and can be vulnerable to exploitation from hackers.

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

Does it make sense to lock up 2.4 million people on any given day, giving the U.S the highest incarceration rate in the world. More people are going to jail, this implies that people are taken to prison everyday for many facilities and many go for no reason. People go to jail and get treated the worst way as possible. This is a reason why the prison system needs to be changed. Inmates need to be treated better.

Read More
1251 Words | 6 Pages

DNA in forensic science The majority of cells making up the human body are diploid cells carrying identical DNA, with the exception of haploid gametes and red blood cells. Several types of biological evidence such as blood and hair are commonly used in forensic science, which is the scientific study of evidence for crime scene investigations and other legal matters. Forensic science is used for the purpose of DNA analysis, this is the analysis of DNA samples to determine if it came from a particular individual. DNA analysis is done by obtaining DNA samples from an individual; next, a large sample of DNA is produced from amplified selected sequences from the DNA collected.

Read More

More about The Importance Of DNA Evidence In Prisons

Related Topics

Open Document