Discipline Of Robots Essay

So can we hold the robot accountable for its actions? Since, it might not be fair for either the programmers or the commander to take responsibility. According to Robert Sparrow, to hold a robot accountable for its actions, we need to develop a way to compensate and discipline the robots appropriately to their actions. This will raise a problem, according to Peter M. Asaro, when applying criminal laws to robots, how do we discipline a robot. We undoubtedly, could punish a robot anyway we wanted. However, is disciplining a robot the same as disciplining a human? To answer this question, we need to learn what it means to be disciplined. Punishment makes an object suffer for an unpleasant action. How do we discipline a robot, when it doesn’t have

I believe, we should only use non-lethal weapons for self-governing robot. Recognizing and destroying accurate targets is a too laborious task for robots. We can think that a robot is programmed with a list of screening questions that it must check with every object before opening fire. “Is the target a Soviet-made T-80 tank? Identification confirmed. Is the target placed in an authorized free-fire sector? Location confirmed. Are there any friendly units within a 200-meter radius? No friendlies detected. Are there any civilians within a 200-meter radius? No civilians detected. Weapons release authorized. No human command authority required.” (P. W. Singer) This implementation is not only unrealistic but also too complex for us to come up with this list (P. W. Singer). Therefore, non-lethal weapon will keep everyone in a safe zone when deploying self-governing robots. Secondly, the robots’ self-defense should be restricted. However, this causes a great challenge from the Pentagon. According to the Pentagon, their robots are permitted to self-defense “including even to preemptively fire on possible threats” (P. W. Singer).I think robots can safe guard itself only if it doesn’t violate any rule of engagements or law of