ipl-logo

Indigenous People Should Have Full Control Over Their Own Land

746 Words3 Pages

Indigenous peoples have rich cultures, languages, and civilizations, all of which have been developing for centuries, yet in the United States they are subjected to poverty on the very sacred land their ancestors had created this unique life for generations to come. They should have the control over their own land and the culture that was created there. Indigenous groups have had cultural ties to their lands since their first ancestors lived there. Due to their extensive knowledge of the land, they can help out the non-natives with restoring biodiversity to the world. Their lands are rich with natural resources, but companies are extracting them without giving pay to the people from whose land they are profiting. The federal government has no business deciding what happens to indigenous lands. Only indigenous peoples can decide that. Indigenous peoples should have full control and rights over their lands and the cultures from which they developed over generations. Indigenous peoples have had long histories of rich cultures long before their lands were colonized and resources …show more content…

It is unfair to take away natural resources that are pivotal to the survival of these tribes all for an economic push. These people are living in poverty while companies such as Energy Transfer Partners make nearly five billion dollars off of land that is not theirs. If these companies took as much time and energy into talking to the indigenous people of America as they do destroying their land for resources, maybe we would have found a better solution by now that would benefit both sides. For centuries, indigenous people were arrested and forced to assimilate for behaving and looking differently than other Americans, but now a major corporation knowingly withholds a proper investigation on the environment and they still get to continue. It is

Show More
Related
228 Words | 1 Pages

In order to control even more the natives, another Indian Appropriation Act was passed in 1871. It said that Indian tribes were no longer seen as an indepedent nation but that all Indians were just individuals, like everyone. But also that they were "wards" of the federal government. This obviously made the natives less powerful, because as a tribe, they were numerous so they had more power and they could have treaties with the government. But with the act, it did not work anymore.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

Hello Tamara Thank you for the insight on the federal Indian termination policies durning the 1950’s,and our selfish acts in attempting to move Indians off reservations and into subruban areas, I feel that justice could never be made for the todays native americans simply because the suffering we put their ansestors through could never take away the tears or pain we inflicted on them ,even though our federal government had even initiated a policy of removal as well as termination of the native americans under this particular policy that was souly created so the Native American people would no longer be government wards on reservations which todays era they are entiltled for the most psrt “subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

Cases in which land has been returned to indigenous owners have already been examined and brought to light. This happened in California's redwood forests. The trees were returned to their descendants and studies show their protection and care paid off.  (Bearfoot, 2022) The land is richer in health and more wildlife inhabits it.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

There is truly nowhere on the planet that has be unaffected by human life. Therefore, forcibly removing American Indians from their historic home to preserve their land or preserving landscapes in less developed nations is not

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

If State and federal laws won’t protect Native reservations form non-tribal personnel committing crimes on tribal land, then Native reservations should be able to have sovereignty over their own jurisdiction. Asserting jurisdiction over non-Natives gives back a sense of sovereignty and the importance of authority over outsiders that current laws sweep under the rug. Claudia Card writes, “ [i]t breaks the spirit, humiliates, tame, produces a docile, deferential, obedient soul. Rape impacts individual women physically, emotionally, and spiritually, and creates numerous problems in the lives of the victims.” A traumatic event such as this needs justice to be served for these Native women to be able to move on with there lives knowing that they got justice for the wrong doing that was done upon them.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

I find this unjust for many reasons. First off, you are taking thousands of acres of land that belong to someone else and forcing them to move to a place where they are only given a few acres. Then, after they are removed, you take their businesses, farms, and property.

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

The problem is they don’t legally own the land. They traditionally own the land. Even before Europeans came to Canada, the Lubicon Cree had already settled in Lubicon Lake. However, during the signing of Treaty 8, they were overlooked by the government due to isolation and therefore, they were not legally acknowledge as owners of the land and as an Aboriginal nation. The all weather roads, oil companies, were built without their consent, because it is considered crown land.

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

This was believe by the Sioux nation to be a complete violation of the treaty of Laramie in 1868. In 1920 the Sioux Nation argue in the United States Court claims the Act of 1877 was unconstitutional because it violated the treaty of Laramie, and the 5th Amendment because the compensation that the Sioux nation received were unjust. The claimed was dismissed in the United Stated court of claims because the court claimed that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction under the 1920 ACT to asses if the compensation given to the Sioux Nation for the Black hills was adequate. However, In 1946 under the Indians Claims Commission the Sioux Nation resubmitted their petition that claim that the Sioux Nation were entitle to just compensation under the Just compensation clause of the 5th amendment.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

The state of the nation's economy is typically a hot topic that is frequently brought up in community meetings, politics, and gossip. However, one area of the economy that is not often heard about is the economies of the United States Native American tribes. Federally recognized Native American tribes are unique in our nation in that they are sovereign governments (National Congress of American Indians). Each tribe is unique in it's cultural, diversity, and economy due to the sovereign status of the Native American tribes.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

For starters, the words “right to culture or self-determination” has loose meanings. Once the Article 3 of the 1993 draft was established for the United Nation Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) there was controversy not only because of the term “self determination” but also because there were multiple attempts to limit what that meant

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the history of the United States, there generally have been dozens of particularly social movements, which is fairly significant. From the African American Civil Rights Movement in 1954 to the feminism movement in 1920, protests for all intents and purposes have helped these groups basically earn rights and fight injustice in a really major way. Some injustices that these groups face range from lack of voting rights to police brutality, or so they essentially thought. The indigenous people of North America aren’t actually immune to these injustices, basically contrary to popular belief. Back in the 1968, the American Indian Movement generally was formed to for all intents and purposes give natives security and peace of mind in a

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The invisibility of Native peoples and lack of positive images of Native cultures may not register as a problem for many Americans, but it poses a significant challenge for Native youth who want to maintain a foundation in their culture and language. " - NCAI President Brian Cladoosby (April 2014 - Washington Post

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

They are not happy and content with what the tribes have done for them. They want to take and take until the Indians have nothing

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The land that most people believe to be rightfully theirs, and theirs alone is an incorrect assumption. The land they live on was once home to many indigenous people and their descendants still live there to this day. The indigenous people consisted of the Corn People, the Olmeca, the Maya, the Tolteca, the Tarasco, who were also known as the Purepecha, and the Azteca. Each indigenous tribe had their own way of life with their own developments. Quite often the developments were very advanced for their time periods.

Read More

More about Indigenous People Should Have Full Control Over Their Own Land

Related Topics

Open Document