More handpicked essays just for you.
How did slavery influence US history
Compromise and the constitution thematic essay
How slavery affected american history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How did slavery influence US history
As mentioned in the module, "Lecture Notes for Chapter 2 The Constitution", the Three-Fifths Compromise or "the three-fifths rule", was put into motion as a way to appease Northern delegates while also preventing the Southern delegates from leaving the convention. The compromise ultimately states, "The three-fifths meant that the House of Representatives and the electoral college would be apportioned in part of the basis of property--specifically, property in slaves" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 42-43). In other words, this referred to slaves in that each one would be counted as three fifths of a person, which benefited slave owners the most as that meant they would have more people from the South when it came to determining the representation in Congress. which is how the interests of Southern states were addressed.
The Three-Fifths compromise and the Commerce Compromise were added to the constitution. Many Southern delegates asked for these two compromises because they benefited the economy and power of Southern states. Southern delegates asked for the Commerce Compromise because it affected the economy. According to the text, “An extension on the slave trade was the Commerce Compromise. Northerners wanted to give Congress unlimited power to regulate trade.
According to the book, the three-fifths compromise was used to decide how slaves would be counted for the total population of the state. This number was used to determine how many delegates each state would get. This compromise put an act in place that said slaves would be counted
Instead, they countered back with the concept of slaves being counted for taxation purposes. Along with this, the north wanted to end the slave trade. South rejected this proposition, because slaves were essential to their economy. Delegates wanted a compromise to end the issue without discussing slavery in the Constitution. This led to the three-fifths compromise which delegates eventually agreed to.
It imposed a tax, including tariffs on imports. In this Compromise, smaller States had benefited because did not depend on the slave, but large States was not happy with it. The Northern States were interested in both taxes on imports as well as exports, but the Southern did not want taxes and they wanted to keep their power. It was all about the power restriction of trade, import and export from foreign
The 3/5ths compromise The smaller states wanted more representation in the house but the north argued that if blacks weren 't allowed to vote and didn 't have rights they shouldn 't be counted towards house seats. The compromise stated that every slave counted as 3/5ths of a person towards house
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
This became known as the 3/5 rule, which would allow southern states to increase representatives within congress. The more slaves that were held within the south; the more representation the southern states would get within congress. This method wasn’t to stop slavery, but to maintain slavery.
For example, the three-fifths cause of the Constitution had increased their power in Congress and the electoral college to gain control of the polices of the major parties on slavery. As a result, the Slaver Power consolidated their domination through the purchase of Louisiana and Florida without prohibition of slavery and the passages of the Missouri Compromise that allowed slavery to cross the Mississippi River, the annexation of Texas and the compromise measure of 1850. Observing the dominance of the Slave Power, the Republicans were deeply concerned the fact that Slave Power dominated the government and was using it to extend the peculiar institution and impose a new and alien interpretation of the Constitution on the American people. [3] Furthermore, the Slave Power provided the connection between the Republican view of the south as an alien society and their belief to unify as a political organization to confine the southern influence.
The Northern states, smaller in comparison to the south, already did not have as much representation and political power as the southern states. Therefore, the compromise to them was unnecessary, and they felt they would have all the power and dominate in the polls and decisions. Considering the different views the two already had based on slavery, this alarmed the northern states. However, as time passed, the Three-Fifths Compromise would not provide the advantage the slave owning south had hoped. The Northern states grew more rapidly in terms of population and ended up being opposing political power to others.
These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.
There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.
In the Revolutionary Era, the founding fathers made the Bill of Rights, which is 10 amendments for the basic rights of the citizens. The 3rd amendment is the right to not allow the militia to stay in their homes during non-war times and war times. The 3rd amendment was used widely during the Revolutionary Era, but it is now used by Special Weapons and Tactics and Police. What is the 3rd amendment?
One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.
The result of this was that slave states would have more representation (“The Three-Fifth Compromise”). The reason for this number, was due to the theory that slaves could provide 3/5 the wealth of someone who wasn’t a slave (Morone and Kersh
