Recommended: Spanish colonies relationship with native americans
In 1835 the federal government convinced a tiny group of Cherokee— around 500 of them—to sign the Treaty of New Echota. In this treaty, the group decided to give up all Cherokee land around 1838. Cherokee Chief John Ross sent protests to the U.S. Senate refusing the treaty. Ross explained that the tiny amount of Cherokee Indians that signed the treaty did not speak for all the thousands of Native Americans in the region. Many white Americans, including senators Daniel Webster and Henry Clay, also disapproved the treaty saying it seems cruel.
To the United States Senate and House of Representatives, I am a member of the Cherokee nation currently residing in the state of Georgia. Over the past several years, I have watched as the citizens of Georgia have begun coming onto Cherokee land and slowly attempting to take over. Although I do know that a cause of this sudden disruption was the discovery of gold on our land, this does not change the fact that our fathers, yours and mine, have taken part in multiple agreements over the years which established these land boundaries. However, it has recently become aware to me that it seems we have entered into a Treaty of New Echota, which promises us land in the West, money, and compensation for our lands lost, given that we remove ourselves from our native land within two years time. I have several grievances regarding this agreement, the first of which being that the treaty is not a true binding settlement.
A little over a decade after having declared their independence from Great Britain and working together to agree on a rudimentary constitution, the thirteen American colonies found themselves divided on a new issue. Governed by the Articles of Confederation, it soon became evident to all the sovereign states that this doctrine was inadequate, thus the provinces of the east coast convened in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This was the stage for the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where James Madison, William Paterson, and Roger Sherman all argued three of the most crucial proposals that served as aggregates to the United States Constitution. These proposals were known as The Virginia Plan, The New Jersey Plan, and the resulting Connecticut Compromise. Although the convention was originally intended to amend parts of the Articles of
The 1803 Louisiana Purchase contributed to a greater sense of independence and nationhood in America because it granted America control of a vast amount of land, therefore, showing that it was becoming a world power. Once Spain ceded it to France, America bought it for fifteen million dollars. This meant that they had control of the navigation on the Mississippi River and access to the Gulf of Mexico. They were therefore able to navigate the Great Lakes and the Northeast to New Orleans without having to have another country’s permission to use the ports. The land purchased nearly doubled the size of the United States, providing more room and contributing to Jefferson’s view of an agrarian society.
Whereas twenty-one Cherokees signed away all the Cherokee land east of the Mississippi river without any of Cherokee Council having signed the document or even having taken part in the drafting of the treaty, we the Cherokee Nation Are asking for a review of the circumstances of the treaty. This Treaty of New Echota was engineered by one John Ridge and supported by John F. Schimmerhorn is not supported by the Majority of the Cherokee Peoples. The monetary offering of $4.5 million to leave Georgia peacefully however generous, will not benefit the Cherokee Nation but will most likely fill the pockets of the drafters of this treaty. I am aware of the injustice of United States policy toward my people and hold out the hope that
The Creation of the Erie Canal made New York City the prime port for trading with the Old Northwest. This caused other states to try and compete with New York in order to become successful trading centers by building their own
the French and Indian War had cost the British The Proclamation of 1763 a lot of money. The war was fought in the North American colonies. With aid of Native Americans, the British won. They took over and gained a lot of land in the colonies, which were originally owned by the French. But they had borrowed a huge amount of money to help fund the war.
In 1848, California became part of the United States. A Treaty was set into place at that time to allow the native people to become U.S. citizens. However, because the government failed to live up to the agreed terms of the Guadeloupe Hidalgo Treaty, which was signed as a peace agreement to end the war between the United States and Mexico, the native people suffered horrendously during the next several decades. The confrontation between the Anglo’s and the Indians in California was horrific and brutal to say the least.
The United States federal government tried to resolve its bond with many different Native tribes by treaties. The treaties were formal agreements between the United States government and the Native Americans. Treaties were made by the executive branch on behalf of the president and then ratified by the United States Senate. The treaties made it where Native American Indians would give up their rights to hunt and live on huge sections of land that they had inhabited in exchange for trade goods, houses, and assurances that no further demands would be made in the said treaties (NebraskaStudies. Org).
Trade was very important to both to countries economy, and the people who lived their, but there is one last pivotal effect of the Erie canal that was even more important than these
Maritime Canal Company told the US they could build a canal in Panama or Nicaragua, which the US choose Nicaragua. Building all the way through 1893 until construction shut down because the Company shut down due to funding funding. The United States did not loose hope they wanted a canal so they were going to get it. While the United States were having problems the French were having there own conflicts with the Panama Canal. French were having problems with the excavating the dirt for the canal also suffering financial setbacks.
Historically, it is believed that the causes of large scale events and wars are often rooted in the outcomes of previous conflicts. The American Revolution, one of the largest most historically significant events of all time, was caused by a multitude of events. Specifically, many of the causes were in fact the results of past conflicts and ongoing tension, such as the French and Indian War and British taxation acts. Contrary to popular belief, the impact of American Revolution was not solely confined to the colonies and the British crown. Aside from leading to American independence, the American Revolution was a part of a larger global conflict, involving issues between Great Britain, France, and other foreign nations.
The Iroquois was a religion that wanted peace throughout the five tribes. The peacemaker believed that the five tribes must follow his laws of peace, to keep the peace between the five tribes. He wanted to the tribes be a peaceful and united religion. The five tribes had agreed with him also. So they made a law called the Great Peace, it was made to let peace flow through the five tribes.
When Panama was made into the Panamanian Republic Columbia got mad. This was the first event in history where there was a bloodless battle America and Columbia just talked it there they did not use violence and were civil. Instead of the Panama canal being built at sea level it was built a lock canal. This was used so the Americans would not fail as the French did. The lock canal had a highly engineered massive dam and had platforms that descend and rises not go straight threw.
In the Constitution, commerce is clearly defined as a matter for the federal government to control. Therefore, New York could not interfere with commerce on state waters. This case opened up the ability of the federal government to build infrastructure in order to make westward expansion easier. Canals, roads, and railroads could now be built and regulated federally without the states being able to oppose
