ipl-logo

Material Contribution Test

1261 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Workplace safety disserations

(I) Introduction: In the judgements of McGhee and Fairchild, the distinction between factual causation and legal causation has been obscured. It is argued that the material contribution test has altered the path of the law. I believe this to be correct. The material contribution test for legal causation has become a tool that can be adapted to allow the plaintiff to recover even when the sine qua non rule cannot be applied and when cause-in-fact fails to be established. Usually to establish causation, the cause of the injury must be identified by applying the “but for” test. The material contribution test is applied when there are multiple causes and it cannot be proved as a matter of fact what was the single cause of the injury. The main …show more content…

On one occasion he worked in a brick kiln, but ceased working here after four and a half days due to his development of dermatitis. The defendant was in breach of duty, in that no showering or washing facilities were provided for employees. This meant that the plaintiff had to cycle home after working in very hot and dusty conditions without showering and removing the dust from his body. The plaintiff was unable to prove that the absence of showering facilities caused his dermatitis. It was found on the basis of medical evidence that the provision of showers would have reduced the chances of Mr McGhee contracting the disease but could not prove with certainty that it would have prevented it all together. Although the defendant was found to be negligent, the trial judge held that the plaintiff had not succeeded in proving that this negligence had caused his disease or materially contributed to it. The Lord Ordinary (Lord Kissen) …show more content…

The plaintiff contracted mesothelioma as a result of wrongful exposure to asbestos dust during different periods of employment with various employers. While the inhalation of a single asbestos fibre could cause this disease, continuous exposure could also affect the risk of contracting it. The plaintiff was unable to demonstrate which of his employers had exposed him to the fatal fibre which caused his cancer. It was impossible for him to prove that his mesothelioma occurred as a result of his inhalation of asbestos during employment with his first employer, his second employer or during his employment by the two taken together. It was held that the defendants’ breach of duty in exposing the plaintiff to asbestos dust contributed to the development of the disease and he succeeded in recovering damages. In this case under specific conditions, the proof of causation required for the defendants to be liable was satisfied in proving that there was a material increase in the risk of the contraction of mesothelioma. Exposures by both employers contributed substantially to the risk. Unlike in McGhee where there was only one possible cause of the dermatitis (brick dust), there was two possible employers who are liable. Based on McGhee, Lord Hoffman agreed that as the case reflected the necessary features outlined by Lord Bingham, that it was correct for the House

Show More
Related
882 Words | 4 Pages

And as a result Bernie Banton including other workers sued James Hardie for negligence in 2000. It was estimated that he was one of 12500 claims made against the company for asbestos-related diseases. Many people were affected with the use of asbestos for instance Mr Robert Berengo, who contracted mesothelioma mainly from hugging his father, a painter in the 1960s, settled his case against Amaca for $2million. Banton described the atmosphere of his work place that “I was often covered in a fine white dust. It was on my face, skin, hair and clothes.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

This test case of Bernie Banton and his case against James Hardie impacted not only individuals concerned about the issue but bigger groups such as the government and businesses. Those who have suffered from asbestos related illnesses and their family are encouraging for a new legislation to be passed, as it would allow plaintiffs to claim for damages within 12 months. The 12 month period is necessary as many people find out they have been a victim of asbestos related disease once they have passed away. The changes in the law have been successful in Victoria, Western and South Australia. Bernie Banton test case was a turning point for those who have been suffering from asbestos related disease so they too can launch their cases against companies responsible such as Amaca Pty Ltd. Banton case later became a test case for

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Medical professionals have described tony webs post-accident situation as a very complicated case. - The district court of New south wales is the original jurisdiction for this case. - The assessed amount to be paid was $2,076,707.88 but after applying the agreed 20% apportionment because of the plaintiff's contributory negligence the amount to be paid by Lyndon John Edwards, the defendant was $1,661,366.20.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Md Mesothelioma Litigation along with Attorney Information-Impotant truth to know Md is just about the smallest states the united states and it also rates high 16th between the states the united states intended for quantity of asbestos mesothelioma law suits submitted. Md courts along with lawful system have a tendency to benefit your plaintiffs inside the asbestos associated fits, with regards to 9 of an even dozen latest instances made the decision in support of your plaintiff, along with with regards to 5 of these having verdicts of 1 million cash along with preceding. Dedication of Legal responsibility Courts with Md follow some sort of real contributory carelessness system to view Legal responsibility.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

• Some Cases related to Company’s Liability in respect of Tort I. Bettel et al. v. Yim, (1978), 20 O.R. (2d) In 1976, Howard Bettel and some friends entered Ki Yim’s store. After the boys began acting outrageously, an employee asked them to leave. Instead of immediately leaving the property, the boys went to the front of the store and began throwing wooden matches on the sidewalk.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

This is a case concerning negligence. The plaintiff, Mr. Davis’s wife, wishes to bring this case to the court under negligence law because of the death of her husband in a car accident. There are two defendants in this case. The first defendant, GM Holden Ltd, is a car manufacturer. The second defendant, Brown’s employee, is a truck driver.

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary   Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

In the American legislative system, Jurors make legal decisions based on the information presented to them by the Prosecution and Defense (O'Brien, 1). It is important to note that the decision-making process of a guilty or non-guilty verdict is based on individual narratives, as opposed to a Bayesian form of decision making, or probabilities and likelihoods (O'Brien, 1). Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old department store clerk, in March of 1993 filed a lawsuit, commonly known as the “McDonalds Coffee Case,” against McDonald's Corporation. The Plaintiff argued that the coffee she purchased on February 2, 1992 was unreasonably dangerous and the defendant should be liable for the physical and mental harm it caused her at the time of sale (Dedman, 1). The Plaintiff claimed that her injuries were a direct result of the gross negligence of the Defendant (Tozer, 1).

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

I. INTRODUCTION To be guilty or not to be guilty- that is the question. Who is responsible for John Schmidt 's June 7 on-the-job injury? Was Mr. Schmidt liable for his own injury due to negligence? Did the Company 's Forman, Harry Hiller, have a "duty of care" to properly oversee employees utilizing highly dangerous equipment? Was Mr. Hiller or additional parties responsible for thoroughly inspecting equipment to prevent hazardous conditions within the workplace?

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Upon reviewing the case file, I would say that Hennessy Industries, Inc. had a responsibility to protect Barker and others employees that may come into contact with anything that came be harmful to their wellbeing or not safe. Even through Hennessy Industries, Inc. argued “that it could not be held liable for injuries caused by another manufacturer’s products even if it was foreseeable that its machines would be used to repair products that contained asbestos” (Melvin, S., & Katz, M. , 2015) they still should have taken steps to protect their employees. I understand that they could never know what was going to come through their doors, but they should have plan for the worst and have the proper protective equipment available. They would

Read More
1503 Words | 7 Pages

The landmark case of Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 has created the three tier test in order to establish duty of care. The Caparo test departs from the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 as well as the test laid down by Lord Wilberforce in the case of Anns v Merton LBC [1978] AC 728 that begins by assuming that there is a duty of care and that damage or injury was foreseeable unless there is good reason to judge otherwise. Whereas the Caparo test begins by assuming that no duty of care is owed unless the criteria of the three tier test are

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

There have been incompatible views on the issue with asbestos-related diseases, for instance is that symptoms are not apparent to an individual until later in life and therefore the late diagnosis would have spread to being almost fatal. James Hardie neglecting their duty of care to past employees had set a negative impact on society. In addition the company’s financial distress has had implications such a claim can have on them if they are not aware of the claim in the first place. And the fact that there are difficulties decisions for insurers on claims that can go far back as 30 years. Many people had lost their jobs as a result of closing the asbestos mines and the financial difficulties the company has had to endure as a consequence of

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

He went to bed and the next day was feeling a bit weak and tired. Two days following this he past away. There was insufficient evidence for the jury to establish the death of the deceased was caused by the throwing of the stone. The doctor says in terms that the blow was the cause of death Except there was nothing in the evidence to cause injury except the blow . The doctor says the injury could have been caused by a fall but there was no evidence of a fall except what was caused by the blow The doctor says that by a short chain of causation , the blow caused the fracture and the fracture caused the death.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

In Haynes v. Harwood, the defendant’s servants negligently left a horse van unattended in a crowded street. The throwing of stones at the horses by a child, made them bolt and a policeman was injured in an attempt to stop them with a view to rescuing the woman and children on the road. One of the defences pleaded by the defendant was novus actus interveniens, or remoteness of consequences, i.e., the mischief of the child was the proximate cause and the negligence of the defendant’s servants was the remote cause. It was held that the defendant was liable even though the horses had bolted when a child threw stones on them, because such a mischief on the part of the children was anticipated. “It is not true to say that where the plaintiff has

Read More

More about Material Contribution Test

Open Document