In passage A, the author, describes the disgusted and impolite mood altering the effects on the man’s human behavior in Parliament. The writer’s purpose is to classify upon readers that London is rubbish. He creates a disgusted and impolite tone in order to convey the readers the idea in order to appeal similar feelings and experiences to the readers. The authors use of imagery, point of view, and diction establishes the authors ambitions. To begin, the author’s use of detail illuminates the uneasy and disruption causing chaos. As the man walks he notices, “ The London rabble, the metropolitan mob, men and woman, boys and girls, the decent poor, and the indecent, who had scrambled into the ranks as they gathered them up on their passage, and were making a sort …show more content…
At the middle of the passage, the man says, “I emerged accidentally into Piccadilly at the moment they were so engaged, and the spectacle was one I should have been sorry to miss.” The piece embellishes the man was satisfied being there. It was a moment he didn’t want to miss if he did he would have been sorry to miss it. On account of the first-person perspective places the reader in the same outlook as the character, the two feel the same urgence and the identical necessity towards the situation considering his experience of going to the Piccadilly. Another one was, “ He exercised, I believe, the useful profession of shoemaker, and he knocked in vain at the door that opens but to the refined.” The piece illustrates the man respecting the shoemaker job and it’s high abilities. The man knocks the door with no purpose and opened it to elegance. At the same time the both man and the reader recognize a desire to opening the door to then see elegance. The reader wants to know the purpose of it all and why the man thinks that way toward the door. The first-person perspective allows a glimpse into the man’s