ipl-logo

The Morality Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

576 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: A level essay on suffragettes history

Morals change constantly; it states that one in five people change their morals every two years. The conspirators convince Brutus Caesar’s friend to join them in the assassination of Caesar, Brutus, and the conspirators kill him to try to stop Caesar from gaining more power. Antony gets the conspirators out of Rome and fights them. Brutus loses and kills himself, and Antony is the ruler of Rome. In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Brutus, and the commoners are easily persuaded against their morals similar to the British suffragette movement. Brutus is easily persuaded against his morals. An example Brutus maligned is “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved/ Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living” Brutis tells the commoners after killing Caesar, hoping that they won't be upset and mad at him (3.2.23-24). Brutus isn’t pensive to care about Caesar and just didn't want him to become a monarch. Brutus in the end starts to say “Why then, lead on.—O, that a man might know/ The end of this day’s business ere it come!” letting someone be a bigger person and have them lead instead of himself lead (5.3.33-34). Because he didn’t want to deal with Antony, Brutus killed himself. In the book, Julius Caesar Brutus is easily …show more content…

During the ceremony after Caesar’s death, many of the commoners weren’t pragmatic, talking about Brutus stating “Let him be Caesar”, the commoners will listen to anybody who has some sort of power(3.2.53). This is shown throughout the story, including Right after Brutus spoke, Antony spoke as well, and the commoners yelled “we will be revenged / Revenge! About! Seek! Burn! Fire! Kill! Slay! Let not a traitor live!”(3.2.215-217). After they were persuaded by Antony, they quickly wanted to kill Brutus. The commoners killed Cinna the poet thinking that he was the one who killed caesar. In the book Julius Caesar, the commoners are easily persuaded throughout the

Show More
Related
850 Words | 4 Pages

“Good friends, sweet friends,let me not stir you up/ to such a sudden flood of mutiny./ They have done this deed are honorable./ What private griefs they have , alas, I know not,/ That made them do it. They are wise and honorable,” (III. ii. 206-210) the repetitiveness of Antony calling the conspirators honorable and that they had killed Julius Caesar for good reason, not for their own benefit. The onlookers were very upset and threatened to burn down Brutus’s home.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

“Brutus did not know if he would go through with the murder” “How was he to kill a man he loved? A man who had loved him like a son and may even be his own true father”. Brutus doesn’t think he will be able to kill a man who he and all of Rome loves. Caesar was more like a god than he was a man. Admittedly, there are some people who believe that Caesar was to powerful and needed to be taken out.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”, surely was meant for entertainment and to be informative, on the other hand it also displays complexity of humans. Shakespeare constantly uses the writing format of ethos, pathos and logos throughout this play. Ethos and pathos are used to persuade people in devious ways, as Brutus is persuaded to overthrow Caesar and become the new Emperor of Rome. Shakespeare wrote “Julius Caesar” for later generations to remember the history, which took place, as he did state, this play shall be rehearsed in various forms. Although his main intention is to entertain people with his play and to show how easy people in negative or positive aspects manipulate their peers.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Blake Brennan F 9CP2 English Ms. Bradley March 23, 2023 Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay Having strong persuasive language will compel people to change their views about a topic. The play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, follows a group of conspirators and the aftermath of Julius Caesar's assassination. During Caesar's funeral, Brutus, a conspirator, makes a response that manipulates the plebeians' to rebel against Caesar. By saying this, Brutus persuades the plebeians to trust him and not Caesar. However, Caesar’s right-hand man, Mark Antony, does not like the conspirators nor Brutus, so he desires revenge.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

However, I think Brutus was a patriot, therefore when Cassius offers him the option to join the plot right away, he declines because he doesn't believe Caesar deserves anything so severe. Brutus resolves to assassinate Caesar after Cassius plants the bogus papers from Rome because he doesn't want the people to be held in servitude. He didn't assassinate Caesar out of envy like the others did, but rather for the good of Rome. Because he chose to die rather than be imprisoned and spends the rest of his life feeling guilty for killing Caesar, Brutus may also appear to be a traitor. However, I do believe that he was being cowardly in certain ways despite his overall bravery.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

Due to Brutus’ strong love for Rome and the citizens, he was able to the manipulate many Romans into believing he had honorable intentions in assassinating Caesar. In order, to prove

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar has met his devastating end. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Brutus and the conspirators assassinate Caesar and convince the citizens of Rome that they were in the right. Antony disagrees with their actions and decides to avenge Caesar at his funeral. In his persuasive speech to the crowd of Romans, Antony utilizes pathos, ethos, and logos to argue that the conspirators’ assassination of Caesar was unwarranted. Doing so forces his audience to transform from mourners into an angry mob of rioters.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, Brutus is not a villain. His conscience tells him that what he did was wrong and something had to be done about it, which ends in him killing himself. He shows lots of compassion throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar(JC) by William

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Act 3 Scene 2 Brutus said during his speech, “If that friend then demands to know why Brutus turned against Caesar, this is my answer: Not because I cared for Caesar less, but because I cared for Rome more”. Brutus had courage to kill Caesar, not because he wanted to, but for the good of Rome and its people. During the entirety of the story, Brutus

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus chooses to be honorable in the eyes of the plebeians and makes a decision for the best of Rome. Brutus has proven multiple times that he has control over the people of Rome because of his actions in being trustworthy and the most honorable and this is why Brutus would be an even better ruler than Caesar could

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

When Brutus spoke about his motives to kill Caesar he said, “As he was valiant I / honor him. But, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (3.2.27-28). Brutus honored Caesar but saw that his ambition has the potential of being very dangerous. He thought that a danger like Caesar could not be left to grow more powerful when there is a solution to the issue now.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

In his soliloquy he says “I know no cause to spurn at him, but for the general”. This means that although Brutus is dear friends with Caesar he believes it is for the good

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” Mark Antony’s use of rhetoric unleashes chaos upon Rome, as he exploits the fickle nature of public opinion by giving the impressionable people of Rome the false choice of mutiny or no mutiny and ignites violent mob mentality through his eloquent speech. For the purpose of avenging the conspirators in tribute to Caesar, Antony persuades the crowd to revolt. Antony claims that if he “were disposed to stir / Your hearts and minds to mutiny and rage, / I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong”(3.2, 124-126, 50). Antony gives the people of Rome the false choice of mutiny or no mutiny, imposing them to believe that if they do not defy Cassius and Brutus they will be doing themselves and Caesar wrong. In fear that they will be harming themselves, the crowd begins to revolt, resulting in utter chaos.

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

After Brutus gives his speech explaining why Caesar had to be murdered, the Plebeians shout praises to Brutus such as, “Caesar’s better parts should be crowned in Brutus,” (3. 2. 54-55). However, after Antony speaks at the funeral, the Plebeians become enraged and chant, “Revenge! About! Seek!

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

More about The Morality Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document