ipl-logo

Is The Constitution Good Or Bad

1039 Words5 Pages

Some people say that the Constitution is good; some say it is bad. The people who opposed the Constitution were referred to as Anti-Federalists. The most common reason that they did not support the Constitution is because they thought it gave too much power to the government. I am here to inform you about all the reasons that the ratification of the Constitution was good. First, you will need to know about how it all happened. In May of 1787, representatives from the states gathered in Philadelphia at a Constitutional Convention. This meeting was organized to improve the Articles of Confederation, which previously acted as a National Government. Some major characters that attended this meeting were James Madison, Benjamin Franklin and George …show more content…

Many Federalists and Anti-Federalists began to debate whether the Constitution was good or bad. When it came to representation, there were also differences of opinion in the various regions about whether slaves should count towards the state’s population. The people in the south wanted this so they would have more representatives and therefore more power in Congress. The Northern states did not like this idea and wanted the number of slaves to only determine taxes, not representation. After a lot of debate, the delegates voted on the Three-Fifths Compromise, which would allow three-fifths of a state’s slave population to be counted for representation. Governor Morris from New York state spoke against the Three-Fifths Compromise at The Convention. He was saying that the southern states that had slaves were basically poor and miserable and the states that did not were prosperous and happy. He felt that slaves should not be counted as property, and that they should be free …show more content…

This is known as the separation of powers. The central government was divided into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The legislative branch was responsible for making and passing laws. It was made up of two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The legislative branch also approves treaties, declares war, grants money and confirms presidential appointments. The executive branch consists of the President, Vice President and all of the departments that help run the government. The executive branch carries out all laws that are passed by the legislative branch. The executive branch also commands the armed forces, makes treaties and conducts foreign policy. The judicial branch consists of all of the national courts and is responsible for interpreting the laws, punishing criminals and settling disputes between the states. The judicial branch also reviews lower court decisions. These three branches of government are a checks and balance system for each

Show More
Related

DBQ Summary: Federalism And The Constitution

756 Words | 4 Pages

Ernie Law Zink 3° US History 15 September 2016 DBQ Essay When the delegates met in 1787 they aimed to fix the national government. The previous governmental charter, the Articles of Confederation, failed because it was just too weak and wasn’t getting the job done. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no court system, no chief executive, and there was no particular way for the central government to force states to pay their taxes. By creating the Constitution, it would build a stronger central government and would be able to hold the nation together.

Read More

The Three-Fifths Of The Virginia Plan At The Constitutional Convention

433 Words | 2 Pages

As mentioned in the module, "Lecture Notes for Chapter 2 The Constitution", the Three-Fifths Compromise or "the three-fifths rule", was put into motion as a way to appease Northern delegates while also preventing the Southern delegates from leaving the convention. The compromise ultimately states, "The three-fifths meant that the House of Representatives and the electoral college would be apportioned in part of the basis of property--specifically, property in slaves" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 42-43). In other words, this referred to slaves in that each one would be counted as three fifths of a person, which benefited slave owners the most as that meant they would have more people from the South when it came to determining the representation in Congress. which is how the interests of Southern states were addressed.

Read More

Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

882 Words | 4 Pages

The Executive branch executes laws and is the president. The Judicial branch judges laws and is the Supreme Court. The Legislative branch creates laws and is the House of Representatives and Senate. James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 Document B, “the accumulation of all powers...in the same hands...may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This helps protect from tyranny because the Separation of Powers prevents all power from being in the same hands.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

1157 Words | 5 Pages

The Three-Fifths Compromise is between the North and the South. The issue they were arguing over is whether a slave should be counted as a part of the state’s population, which determines how many representatives the state can select. The North had a population mostly that was comprise of white man. They believed that slaves shouldn’t be counted as a person since they were not citizens and didn’t have the rights to vote. However, the South disagreed because the majority of their population was slaves.

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The executive branch enforces laws, the legislative branch passes the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. The purpose of the separation was to guarantee that no branch has more power to dominate over the

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

637 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, on May 25, 1787. Most of the delegates were from the upper classes of American society. The most famous delegate, George Washington, was “unanimously elected president” of the Convention (Cassel, 1994. P. 119). Originally, the delegates intended to revise the Articles, however their debates resulted in a whole new constitution.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

1231 Words | 5 Pages

As leaders of the nascent nation entered the Constitutional Convention of 1787, they aimed to unify the country under a set of common laws and values. During this process, the delegates were divided on the topic of slavery, in terms of how it would affect the way states were represented in Congress and how states were taxed by the national government. After many proposals, the delegates arrived at the three-fifths compromise, which valued slaves as 3/5th of free persons for the purposes of representation and taxation. If a true compromise is an agreement in which the parties involved make equal concessions, then the three-fifths compromise was not a true compromise because it favored the South by giving it disproportionate power in the national

Read More

Confederation Vs The Great Compromise

483 Words | 2 Pages

It was May, 1787, when representatives from all over the country came to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. George Washington was chosen to run these meetings, as they all believed he was trustworthy, he could have an unbiased opinion, and also that he could keep their secret. Their secret being the meetings and the discussions that took place here. They kept it unknown by the media and people so that they could say as they please without unwanted pressure. They created these meetings with the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, on account of much needed to be done.

Read More

Examples Of The Three Fifths Compromise

1316 Words | 6 Pages

As a result, a compromise was agreed upon. Three fifths, or sixty percent, of a state's slave population would be represented in Congress. This came to be known as the “Three-Fifths Compromise”. A second issue raised during the writing of the Constitution, was whether the government should given the power to regulate slave trade.

Read More

George Washington's Contributions To The Articles Of Confederation

868 Words | 4 Pages

to make the Articles of Confederation work. George Washington didn’t like this idea of revising the Articles at first, but the news of the rebellion made him change his mind. After he agreed to attend the convention, it took on greater significance. The meeting took place in Philadelphia in May 1787, with fifty-five delegates that had occupation such as planters, merchants, lawyers, physicians, generals, governors, and a college president. Taking Thomas Jefferson’s place from Virginia were Edmund Randolph and James Madison.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq

1372 Words | 6 Pages

After fighting for so long and hard to secure independence from the British rule, the young United States of America needed to come together to form a strong nation. Having literally sacrificed blood, sweat, and tears to free themselves from the tyrannical oppression of an over-powered central government, the people wanted to ensure that they would not be trading one for another. There needed to exist a means to effect a measure of equality and security for the newly founded country. The Constitution aimed to do just that.

Read More

Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Fail

566 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the executive branch was responsible for enforcing or vetoing laws passed by Congress (in addition to its other powers). As for the judiciary, it is responsible for interpreting federal laws and the constitution and for overseeing the decisions made by the federal and state courts. Before when it was unable to address economic and boundary disputes, the judiciary under the constitution was able to address a wide range conflicts. Above all, these three branches of government share equal power to prevent one form of government from becoming too

Read More

Debate Over Slavery During The Constitutional Convention

145 Words | 1 Pages

Another major debate during the Constitutional Convention was whether or not the slaves should count towards representation in Congress. While most Northern states wanted to abolish slavery completely, the South wanted them to count towards representation, to allow them for more representatives. The North argued that if slaves could not vote, they should not count, while the South debated against this. In the end, the Three Fifths Compromise was suggested and accepted. This Compromise stated that each slave would count as three-fifths of a free white male.

Read More

The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

1593 Words | 7 Pages

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

Read More

Three Branches Of The Federal Government Essay

773 Words | 4 Pages

The United States federal government is comprised of three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. Within the judicial branch there is the federal court and the state court. The job of the court is to interpret the laws and hold the people accountable for the laws that were passed by the legislative branch. Additionally, the Judicial Branch settles legal disputes, determines punishment for breaking the law, and protects the individual rights of each state.

Read More

More about Is The Constitution Good Or Bad

Related Topics

Open Document