I did read the written lecture paragraph, and listened to the lecture, by novelist Neil Gaiman.
The one interesting paragraph, which really gotten my interest. It is whatever, in the unlikeness of the situation or circumstances, If, you or I is (was, or were) trapped in an impossible situation while a person (or people) whom being(s) meant to treat me as ill, mistreated, being abused, neglected, at or in any unpleasant area, a place or environment. (?). My perception, thoughts of unreasoning, about the other individual person or a group of people, I will have strong doubts, none acceptations’, just won’t, will not accept any lesser offerings, from nobody, if, I, have a perception about the other person or (people), about the lesser offer as being harmful to me, as them, towards myself. On
…show more content…
Somebody, anyone, a person, offering me, a better, best temporary escape. with reasoning. Truthfully, Heck yeah! I would accept, that person offering in a heart-beat!! Because I would consider that as an un-entrapment and a very possible good-to-great situation, with whom, as a good-to-great circumstance. My own reasoning, of natural knowledge is obviously clear about the escape message accepted to me, as verbal or nonverbal information from the other person or from a group as a message sent to me, from whom, is truly being honest, sincere, while treating me with respect and it is a safe scenario. That really got me into thinking, it may happen, either ways. My reasoning, to why, is I agree with Neil Gaiman that fiction books, fictional information, may be treated as natural knowledge, about the world, common knowledge about opening a