Even though Prejudice, racism, and Interferences are not a beginning but an end. The Rights are for all persons not to be prejudice, being indifferent or refusing suffrage in many ways makes that person guilty as the one who has refused on of their rights. It should be judged and ruled severely in both moral and legal terms. Indifference allows the violence. Unification would dis arm it.
First, Indifference is not a beginning but an end because rights are for all persons not to be used as a prejudice. There are similarities between Elie Wiesel’s speech: “The Perils of indifference” and Susan b. Anthony’s speech: {On Women’s Right to Vote”. Both are Activist. They both are speaking out against injustice. Human Dignity is perhaps the greatest similarity. They both have endured some sort of prejudice and or violence. Both of their past personal experiences have had an impact on the present government. Both speeches and people appeal to ethics.
…show more content…
This right is a given to women today. But it is only because of a women’s activist., Susan B. Anthony. She died before we were given that right, however her fight for the right to vote for women is the reason we have that right today. She was an activist for women and for Negros, whereas Elie Wiesel wants to end the indifference across the globe. He wants society to become more human. To be more aware of the Plight of victims of ethnic cleansing. Although their past experiences are both a legacy, Anthony was defining a citizen in the US and Wiesel was speaking out against persecution across the