ipl-logo

The Perils Of Indifference And Susan B. Anthony's Speech

437 Words2 Pages

Even though Prejudice, racism, and Interferences are not a beginning but an end. The Rights are for all persons not to be prejudice, being indifferent or refusing suffrage in many ways makes that person guilty as the one who has refused on of their rights. It should be judged and ruled severely in both moral and legal terms. Indifference allows the violence. Unification would dis arm it.

First, Indifference is not a beginning but an end because rights are for all persons not to be used as a prejudice. There are similarities between Elie Wiesel’s speech: “The Perils of indifference” and Susan b. Anthony’s speech: {On Women’s Right to Vote”. Both are Activist. They both are speaking out against injustice. Human Dignity is perhaps the greatest similarity. They both have endured some sort of prejudice and or violence. Both of their past personal experiences have had an impact on the present government. Both speeches and people appeal to ethics. …show more content…

This right is a given to women today. But it is only because of a women’s activist., Susan B. Anthony. She died before we were given that right, however her fight for the right to vote for women is the reason we have that right today. She was an activist for women and for Negros, whereas Elie Wiesel wants to end the indifference across the globe. He wants society to become more human. To be more aware of the Plight of victims of ethnic cleansing. Although their past experiences are both a legacy, Anthony was defining a citizen in the US and Wiesel was speaking out against persecution across the

Show More
Related
390 Words | 2 Pages

“On Woman’s Right to Vote” was made by Susan B. Anthony to prove that women should have the right to vote. Throughout the writing she uses techniques to prove her points. Which are ethos, pathos, logos and rhetorical questions. She uses these techniques of writing to really prove a point in her writing. So the audience will read it and understand why women should have the right to vote.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

These two characters are similar through them being hypocrites,

Read More
98 Words | 1 Pages

In history, every social movement had its prominent leader. The African American civil rights movement had Martin Luther King Jr., and the women 's suffrage movement had Susan B. Anthony. As for the LGBTQIA community, the obvious leader would be the man who spearheaded the gay rights movement other than the Stonewall Riot. Milk reached the greatest milestone for the movement by becoming the first openly gay man to hold public office. Elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, Dan White assassinated Milk and Mayor George Moscone not even a year after Milk won the election.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

Susan B. Anthony Susan B. Anthony was a suffragist who fought for the right to vote for women. Anthony had several reasons for why a woman should not be deny the right to vote. Some of them being that women are also humans and as humans the constitution secures their rights and those rights could not be taken away. First, when they denied women’s right to vote it implied that they were not humans like every other man.

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

Next is Frederick Douglass. Douglass was born into slavery in the early 1800s, only two years before Susan B. Anthony. After escaping slavery in Maryland, he took a brave step in publicly speaking to people about the abolition of slavery, women’s rights, and equality. It was risky, as he could be caught and forced back into slavery. He continued to speak though, and eventually became the Massachusetts and New York abolition leader.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

In 1874, Susan B. Anthony was jailed for trying to exercise the right that all men were granted but every woman was denied, the right to vote (Document 1). Twenty six years earlier, the first women’s right movement convention was held to discuss the stark disparity between the genders. A fight that would last for seventy years, the fight for the vote, was a pivotal era in the fight for viewing women as equals. This was a fight against society that has little progress for a long time and the reasoning why is clear. The struggle of women is not a unique story, and the denial of suffrage and equality was led by men because of man's fear of losing power and control in society.

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

A speaker is not credible if they attempt to make listeners feel pity for them, because the audience will view him in a degrading way. Similar to this, Wiesel is humble. He does not speak of his Nobel Peace Prize, and is emphasizing the importance of the future instead of the past in hopes of moving forward in the future. This increases Wiesel’s credibility because he is not bragging or exaggerating his words, and he has experienced this issue first hand, which allows the audience to trust Wiesel and believe his stance on the

Read More
2087 Words | 9 Pages

Women’s rights are human rights. Women felt so underestimated and dependent on the men in their lives but they are very intelligent and had many great ideas on their own. After their right to vote was put into action, opportunities did not just jump at them with open arms, they had to work for what they wanted and they had to prove to everyone around them that they were worthy of having a say in what goes

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

One of the first key ideas he stated was about how bad it is to forget an atrocity from the past, such as the Holocaust. Wiesel states, “Because if we forget, we are guilty, we are accomplices”(Wiesel Nobel Prize Speech). To forget or deny an event like the Holocaust, is basically forgetting or denying all the lives of innocent people that were lost, and all the unnecessary suffering they endured. Another important point Elie made was that it is important to speak up for what is right, and to not endure the suffering of the oppressor. For example, “Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented, sometimes we must interfere”(Wiesel Nobel Prize Speech).

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

Freedom or Death - or Death? In the passages “Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?” and “Freedom or Death” each author uses rhetorical devices and examples to make their claims that women should have the right to vote. In the first passage “Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?”

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

There are many similarities between these two characters. While some of these similarities are obvious, other are deeper into the book and hidden. A similarity they have is how popular each of them are. Every other character in the book believes in one of them and listens to them on a daily basis. Another proof of this is that everyone has either a television or an empathy box, if not both.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Wiesel’s purpose is to inform the world in order to accomplish compassion in the future for those suffering injustice around the world. He establishes a critical tone for readers by using stylistic devices such as pathos and repetition in order to develop his message

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Women's Voting Rights A woman voter, Susan B. Anthony, in her speech, Woman’s Right to Vote (1873), says that women should be allowed to vote. She supports this claim first by explaining that the preamble of the Federal Constitution states that she did not commit a crime, then she goes on about how women should be able to vote, then about how everyone hates the africans, and finally that the people of the United States should let women and africans vote. Anthony’s purpose is to make women able to vote in order to give women the right to vote on decisions made by the people. She creates a serious tone for the people of the United States.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The manipulation caused by higher parties cause the oppressed to believe that their treatment is right and thus are turned into brainwashed individuals who aren’t capable of consensus to rebel. “What mattered were individual relationships, and a completely helpless gesture, and embrace, a tear, a word spoken to a dying man, could have value

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

For a very long time, the voting rights of the citizens have been a problem in the US. It started out with only men with land being able to vote, and then expanded to white men, and then to all men. However, women were never in the situation, they were disregarded and believed to not be worthy enough to have the same rights as men. They were essentially being treated as property, therefore having no rights. But, in Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she hits upon the point that women are just as righteous as men.

Read More

More about The Perils Of Indifference And Susan B. Anthony's Speech

Related Topics

Open Document