ipl-logo

The Philosophies Of Nonviolent Resistance And Terrorism

1062 Words5 Pages

The philosophy of nonviolent passive resistance is a strategy that has been used by several civil rights organizations, including the NAACP, SNCC, and CORE, to initiate change in society. This philosophy is based on the principle of using nonviolent means to resist oppression and injustice, without resorting to physical violence. The idea is to expose the unjust nature of the system by refusing to comply with unjust laws and practices, while also showing respect for the dignity of all individuals, including those who oppose the movement. Nonviolent passive resistance seeks to create a moral and spiritual awakening in society, and to promote dialogue and reconciliation between different groups. This philosophy has been effective in bringing …show more content…

They believe in using force to achieve their objectives and have carried out numerous acts of violence against civilians and governments that oppose their ideology. In summary, the philosophies of non-passive resistance espoused by entities such as Malcolm X, the Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, IRA, ISIS, and the Taliban are fundamentally different from the principles of nonviolent passive resistance used by civil rights organizations. These entities believe in using force and violence as a means of achieving their goals, while nonviolent passive resistance seeks to effect change through peaceful means. Based on historical evidence and research, it is widely acknowledged that the strategy of nonviolent passive resistance, as advocated by leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. and used by civil rights organizations such as the NAACP, SNCC, and CORE, was the most effective approach to achieving lasting change and progress in the United States civil rights …show more content…

This helped to galvanize public opinion against the status quo and pressure lawmakers to enact change. While it is true that some entities believe in using force and violence as a means of achieving their goals, it is important to note that such strategies often lead to further violence and repression, and rarely achieve lasting change. Nonviolent passive resistance, on the other hand, has been proven to be an effective and sustainable way to achieve social and political progress, both in the United States and globally. In conclusion, the strategy of nonviolent passive resistance has been proven to be the most effective approach to achieving lasting change in civil rights movements. It promotes respect for human dignity and seeks to challenge systemic oppression through peaceful means, which creates an environment of understanding, reconciliation, and

Open Document