Leonardo Da Vinci Famous Painting Analysis

801 Words4 Pages

However, Leonardo da Vinci was a master of this technique called chiaroscuro. He developed a new perspective understanding, starting from the fact that he could not catch the details of the "objects" he observed in the less illuminated places of the light. The transitions between the forms in the picture softened, the details became unclear, and he moved away from using sharp teeth lines and not only the depths covering far distances, this technique, called sfumato, led to the creation of the most subtle examples of the atmospheric perspective that struck the fifteenth-century form of painting: The Portessa of Cecilia Gallerani, the Madonna of the Rocks, Mona It is possible to see all the details of this technique in paintings like Lisa.With its composition with sensitive mathematical calculations, with its dark backgrounds and especially with the use of color tone, Leonardo da Vinci 's painting was the manifestos of the painting, while the artist depicted a unique attitude in the figure depictions

Leonardo da …show more content…

Da Vinci 's contemporary art historian Giorgio Vasari said, "... the table has been playing for four years and has not finished painting ...". It was a routine behavior for Leonardo, and he regretted the idea that he could not finish any work at all. After traveling to France, he decided to continue the painting for 3 years. Da Vinci had gone to France and continued to work on the painting, invited by King François I to the nearby castle. Then the king of the period, bought the table with 4.000 écus and at the Fontainebleau Palace XIV. He was hanged by Louis. Later, the table moved to Versailles Palace. After the French Revolution, the table moved to the Louvre Palace. Although Napoleon moved to the Tuileries Palace by Bonapart, he later returned to the Louvre. During the Franco-Prussian War between 1870 and 1871, the painting was moved to the French military territory "Brest