More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay on why electoral college shouldn't exist anymore
Two party system advantages and disadvantages
What are the disadvantages of electoral college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many proposed plans to run the government and decide the next president. Ideas including the District Plan, the Proportional Plan, the Direct Popular Election, the National Bonus Plan, and the National Popular Vote plan are in mind to fix the current system yet none have been decided. Currently, the president is decided by a method known as the Electoral College; however, this method has many disadvantages. In the United States today, the government runs a system known as the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is a system that was established in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. It is a system that is used to elect the next President of the United States. The number of electors are based on the number of seats a state holds in the Senate and the House of Representatives. So, when a voter places his ballot. It cast a vow for the elector of that state to vote towards that voted candidate (1).
The 2017 election has chosen Donald j. trump as the president of the united states. Donald trump as the president, just think about how the election process really works and how its chooses our commander and chief of the military. The way the united states chooses who will be the next president is by the electoral college is a process when people vote for electors who then vote for the president or vice president of the united states. The electoral college was created by our founding fathers as a compromise between the “election of the president by a vote congress and the election of the president by popular vote if the qualified citizens.” (source1: what is the electoral college).
y Americans feel puzzled on whether they approve of the electoral college or change it all together. However, before the argument begins on which method would prove most beneficial to Americans, we must consider all the facts surrounding how the electoral college works. Each state, including the District of Columbia, receives one electorate for each of congressional delegates which includes both the house of representatives and senate. Most states, with the exception of Nebraska and Maine, adopted a winner takes all approach that uses the majority from each state to determine who all the its electors vote for. This becomes an issue when the popular vote, which is determined by looking directly at the number of votes each candidate received by the citizens themselves, and the electoral college do not match.
The Votes that Should Count The United States should abolish the Electoral College, by amending the Constitution, and use the Direct Popular Vote process for presidential elections. Though the U.S. Constitution Article two, section one, clause two states that the appointment of electors belong exclusively to the states (National Conference of State Legislator), it is seemingly pointless to carry out national voting polls of the public if only electoral college votes will hold the count for the next elected president. Every three years around the United States, candidates who decide to run for the seat of presidency begin their campaign to win the votes of Americans, but for what?
Did you know that in two out of the last five U.S. presidential elections, the candidate who won the popular vote did not win the presidency? Now, to explore the question, Should We Abolish the Electoral College? The very system that defies the will of the majority. This question is often being thought about as the Electoral College has what some may argue advantages and perks, but it does have its downsides and what some may argue flaws. We will be exploring on why the current Electoral College should be left alone, as it does not allow the majority to always get their way, it ensures that all parts of a country is involved in the election and that candidates will serve the entire country, and lastly, the Electoral College creates a compromise between popular vote and congressional choice.
Watching this year’s election was shocking. Against all predictions, against every analysis, Donald Trump became the president-elect of the United States. But were those predictions really off? As the LA Times put it,” Hillary Clinton got roughly the same number of votes that President Obama received four years ago en route to his reelection, but she nonetheless lost the presidency to Donald Trump, who came in at least 2.8 million votes behind her.” This is, of course, because of the electoral college.
As of recently a debate that has existed in American politics for centuries has flared up again. The debate in question is whether we should keep our Electoral College for the purpose of electing our President or abolish it and elect our Presidents through a popular vote. Those who seek to abolish the Electoral College cite instances -recent and past- in which Presidential Candidates have won the popular vote yet lost the majority of the Electoral College. They also argue that the undemocratic philosophy behind the Electoral College, the thought that the American people aren’t competent enough to choose their own Commander in Chief, is an outdated piece of a backwards past that has no place in modern society and law. Those who seek to preserve the Electoral College as it is state that the electoral system the framers of the Constitution created is as good as it can
Emma Williams American Government 1A Mr. Baker 2 March 2023 The Positives of the Electoral College Once a teenager turns eighteen, they have the privilege to practice their right of voting for their local and federal government officials. Unlike voting for their mayor or House Representatives, the Presidential elections require the Electoral College. Established in Article II of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers decided the best way to elect the President was by both using congressional powers and equal representation. To explain, each state automatically gets two votes representing their Senators, then depending on the number of Representatives in the state, the number of Electoral votes a state gets are decided.
The recent presidential election has had a controversy on the abolishment of the Electoral College. With many citizens not understanding whether or not their vote is actually being counted during the election, more debates have risen on if popular vote should be the deciding factor of presidential determinations instead. Popular vote is an actual count of individual votes from all states in America while the Electoral College is a measure of the House of Representatives and Senators choosing directly who the president should be (Kimberling, 1992). The reasoning behind why the Electoral College was the determining factor for president was declared by the founding fathers decades ago to ensure equality (Pavia, 2011). Recently, critics have expressed that this system is not as equal as predetermined.
Bella Seedhouse Mrs. Sisamis CCP Government 3 May 2024 Abolition of the Electoral College The United States government is constantly changing and evolving to suit the needs of its citizens and to best represent the majority. Shifting from the Articles of Confederation to drafting the Constitution is just one example of the many times the United States has progressed towards the betterment of the nation. The ability of our government to change laws and our founding document allows our nation to move forward and continuously improve our system of democracy. Currently, there is an issue with the voting system and presidential election outcomes: the Electoral College. The Electoral College maintains the power to overrule the decision of the popular
This electoral system is inherently undemocratic, as it fails to adequately represent the collective opinion of the nation, and it, in turn, disadvantages citizens that do not live in large swing states. The system of the Electoral College violates the tenets of democracy in several ways. In the 21st century
The Electoral College has been a cornerstone of the American presidential election process since the founding of the nation. Designed as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election by popular vote, it has faced increasing scrutiny and calls for abolition in contemporary times. This essay examines the arguments both for and against abolishing the Electoral College, weighing the democratic principles of fairness and representation against the practical implications of its continued existence. One of the primary arguments in favor of abolishing the Electoral College is its potential to undermine the principle of one person, one vote. Critics argue that the winner-takes-all allocation of electoral votes in most states can lead to
It was November 8th, 2017, also known as, Election Day in the U.S. At exactly 2:00 it had been announced that Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote, but the election was not over yet. 2:30. It had been announced that Trump had won the presidential election to the shock of many, prompting the question, is the electoral college was really the best way to decide elections? Yes.
The first words in the Constitution are “We the people”, yet the Electoral College takes away power from the people to directly elect a President. To better understand the Electoral College, we will delve into the basics of the Electoral College and presidential elections, the pros and cons of the Electoral College in modern times, and a specific instance in which the Electoral College majorly affected the outcome of an election. The government should abolish the Electoral College, so United States citizens can directly elect whom they feel should head the Executive Branch. To begin, the Electoral College is a process, not an educational institution.
