The Electoral College has caused numerous problems in the past and have consequently changed the outcomes of numerous elections including the elections of 1800 (Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Aaron Burr), 1824 (John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay and William H. Crawford), 1876 (Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden), 1888, (Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison), and 2000 (George W. Bush and Al Gore). throughout these elections the same catastrophe has occurred; The winner of the popular vote did not receive the presidency due to the Electoral College votes. In addition to the problems, there have been multiple close calls, for the example the elections of 1968 and 1976. While many analysts of American politics have come to …show more content…
What did you not see the DraStic change it would make in the political system, such as an incourage multi-party system. A few analysts have thought of ideas that do not abolish it but many Electoral College. Their ideas consist of congressional district allegation, proportional allocation, and the Electoral College with super electors. Under the system of congressional district allegation electors would be apportioned one to each congressional district and then the two Senator electors. This plan can help to expand the campaigns playing field. This allows the smaller States their chance to receive direct contact with the presidential candidates. Congressional district allegation also allows chance for more parties to win electoral votes, although this may also cause the fragmentation of parties and cause the larger parties to scrounge the minimum number of electoral vote for the presidency. Proportional allocation would have each State's electoral votes divided in the same proportion as that State's popular vote. This plan would have the effect of forcing the candidates to campaign in the smaller, less well-known places. Through the campaigning in the smaller Districts this may have the impact of boosting voter enthusiasm and hopefully causing a spike in participation due to the fact of the candidates reaching out to those who are often ignored in the race. Although this seems a reasonable approach this causes more of an issue of fragmentation than congressional district ting. Lastly, there is the Electoral College with super electors. This idea was introduced by Arthur Schlesinger Jr. in 2000. he proposed that “... candidates would continue to compete for electors on a state-by-state, winner-take-all basis, but the winner of the national popular vote would be awarded a set of bonus