The Pros And Cons Of Animal Agriculture

465 Words2 Pages

Anderson and Kuhn argues about how animal agriculture is destroying our planet. Deforestation, land use, water scarcity, the destabilization of communities, world hunger are really good examples. Animal agriculture is an environmental disaster that is being ignored by the very people who should be championing its awareness. In the United States, animal agriculture consumes 34 million gallons of water per year. Nearly 55% of animal agriculture uses water because it takes 2,500 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef. Another example, it takes 477 gallons of water to make a single pound of egg. To make a pound of cheese, it takes 900 gallons of water. The reason why people of California have such a big drought because of the meat and dairy product that are water intensively. …show more content…

For the environment, there is so many ways of decreasing our usage in water. You know, low flow faucets, showerheads, and efficient water usage appliances. It’s not anyone decision but yours to decide whether you can help the environment. Guivetchi said, “I think that the water footprint of animal husbandry is greater than any other activities. There is no ifs, ands, or buts to it.” California, which is true true to the spirit of American capitalism, exports the enormous amount of water which was an upcoming of a excruciating drought because of the profit to be made. The statistics worldwide showed that 20 to 33 percent of global freshwater use is devour by animal agriculture. By 2025 it’s estimated that 5.3 billion people, will suffer from water shortage. This matters to the author because the way we use water is so unnecessary, that if there is anyway he can limit how much water we use, he’ll do it. This relates in somewhat of human exceptionalism. Thinking that humans can do whatever they want, but might cost you at the