ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

142 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Testing on animals

Every year about 19,500,000 animals not including rats and mice are put to death in 2017 due to animal testing, 13,400,000 of these animals are either Cats or dogs,”(Statistics Brain)”, Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.Animal experimentation is regulated by the “Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (AWA), and the Animal Welfare Regulations which is enforced by the Animal Care division of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).” Ironically, “ in the USA rats, mice, fish, amphibians and birds are not
Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

Over 61,000 dogs suffer in U.S laboratories every year. More than 21,000 cats are forced to endure painful experiments in U.S laboratories anually. Animals have been used repeatedly for scientific research throughout history. However, not all animal studies have been successful when humans were involved. Animal testing torments many innocent creatures for unreliable and costly research that is not necessary.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

South Korea’s National Health and Welfare committee has just recently created a bill that will ban the uses of cosmetics and its ingredients, but it only works against areas that have an alternative to their cause (Miles). This is a great example of how laws that are supposed to fight animal testing just allow advocates of it to evade the laws’ restrictions. Further on the topic, in the nineteenth-century more companies led to the increased use of animals in testing, and subsequently, groups that set out to oppose the use of animals in scientific experiments (Murnaghan). That battle between those advocates and enemies of animal testing is still present and very alive today. Animal testing causes animals to suffer and does not benefit humans,

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

People have animals, especially dogs and cats, as pets. They take care of animals and spend their lives together. However, sacrificing animals is necessary for human life to survive. Moreover, using animal experimentation is common because this can improve our health. Henry E. Heffner and Carl Cohen who are proponents of animal experimentation point out that it is necessary because it can protect human health.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing is a subject that has been deemed controversial for quite a long time now, and is still argued today. Now, you'll see many companies breaking from this animal testing, and making vegan products and selling almost just as well. Just listening to the word,"Animal testing" automatically makes you think of something horrible and inhumane, but there are reasons that it isn't. California Biomedical Research Association says that almost every medical breakthrough within the last 100 years has been derived from animal testing. Animals, especially those that have extremely similar DNA to ours, have been exceptionally helpful in medical research.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Con For Animal Testing Would you buy something that was tested on a animal? If you would, do you know the dangers and harm the animals face when products get tested on animals? Animal testing is controversial because this issue is going to lead people to having mixed feelings on if cruel to test products on them or not. Drea does not support animal testing because chemicals can hurt the animals even causing them to die. Animal testing costs a lot of money in the U.S. Animal testing can mislead researchers to finding treatments.

Read More
1056 Words | 5 Pages

New studies are being published on the ethical failings of researchers to adequately represent data in a variety of contexts. This could have serious implications for the veracity of certain information germane to deliberations on whether or not studies should progress to the next stage, among other things. One new American study, for example, has found that placebo groups are used often in clinical trials despite a lack of appropriate guidelines for how they can be used, and the study shows how problematic that is. Meanwhile, a German and Canadian study is showing what is perhaps an even bigger deal, which is that inadequacies in the designs of animal studies as well as insufficient reporting of said studies are proving to be a circumvention

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing can be traced back to the 17th century with Harvey’s experiments on numerous animal species aiming to demonstrate blood circulation. Protest and controversy against animal testing emerged during the twentieth century with a strong focus against cosmetic testing. Protesters argue that an animal should have the same right as a human and it is wrong because the inability of animals to consent to the tests. Animal testing should be illegal because: regardless of government regulation animals are still mistreated and there are now alternative ways which can eliminate most of animal testing and produce more reliable results. Despite government regulations, animals are mistreated.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

all of the sick individuals that it helps because the act of utilizing non-humans in research does the most good for the most people (Lyons, 2001). Protesters are also considered stakeholders due to the fact that they are usually advocating animal sentience and their rights to live naturally, and not in a laboratory setting. Typically, protestors often have an issue concerning this dilemma due to their own ignorance. Unfortunately, this ignorance usually centers on misinformation obtained from the internet, their own imaginations, and the fact that they do not believe that animal research is necessary. Due to their position of ignorance, a protestor cannot present fair scientific data unless they have actually experienced the animal research

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Considering the external validity in terms of using rats and mice are harder to generalize to humans than say chimps I would say that it does make a difference. Ask most people and I think you would find that experimenting on rats as opposed to chimps is a long leap ethically. Although both are mammals I believe that the closer the animal’s mind comes to the human mind the more ethical concerns are raised, even though the closer correlation would make them more generalizable. I would have to say that I did not have any strong opinions on the ethical nature of animal research, so other than informative the statistic did not impact me one way or the other.

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that research from "Cruelty Free International" and Dr Haden Trust say that at least 115,000,000 animals are possibly used in labs/experiments each year worldwide? That is one reason why I think that testing products on animals is horrible, and should be illegal everywhere. Where is testing on animals illegal? The article "Cosmetics Animal Testing Has Been Banned in These Amazing Places" (onegreenplanet.org) states that it is illegal to test on animals in the EU, Norway, Israel, and India. But some countries that are considering banning it are the United States, Australia and New Zealand.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

“We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply did not work in human beings.” -Dr. Richard Klausner, former director of the US National Cancer Institute. Animal testing is a one of the most controversial topics in the world. Animal testing is not necessary because testing the products on one species and then using the products on another species changes the results.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

implementing laws such as Australia. The very laws meant to protect the innocent lives of these animals is being treated like an option over an actual law. In addition to it being unsafe for humans and morally wrong to use animal testing, there are new discovered alternatives to animal testing. Meredith Cohn, writer of Alternatives to animal testing gaining grounds says, “ Many mainstream researchers are now more strictly adhering to a concept called the Three Rs: reduction in use of animals, refinement of the tests and replacement with new technology when possible” (Cohn 2010).

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document