Police Body Cameras, also known as Body Worn Videos, have been central in a heated debate surrounding an aggressive and increasingly militarized police force, that through misconduct and controversy has lost the trust of the American people. These body cameras have the ability to rebuild this trust by providing accountability and training to the officers as well as crucial evidence for the courts. In the summer of 2014 a young man by the name of Michael Brown was shot down while fleeing arrest in Ferguson, Mo. The police officer, Darren Wilson, would not stand trial for his actions due to conflicting testimony and a lack of evidence against him.
“Pow” “Pow” sounds of gunshots fired by a police officer aiming toward an innocent person. To prevent things like this from happening again police officers should wear body cameras so we can see if they lie about the thing that actually happened during the scene of the crime. With body cameras we can also see if the victim telling the truth and if not we see the crime he had can commit for the police officer to use force. The reason police officers should wear body cameras is if the officer had used force on an individual should be permitted to view the video footage of their encounters before writing their incident report.
Police body cameras Police body cameras are a type of video recording system, which used by law enforcement to record their behavior with the people, and also known to increase both police officers and citizens liability. One of the causes that made body cameras almost mandatory was police brutality against citizens, and especially black people. The other cause is just the inconsistency what the police says, and what the people say, why always people should think that the police officer is telling the truth.
When examining the debate over body cameras aiding in the solution to decrease the amount of police abuse of authority, we have to consider the advantages as well as the disadvantages. Some obvious advantages of police body cameras would be as stated by McCamman & Culhane (2017) studies determined that body cameras helped to deter police use of force with suspects, provides a visual perspective of a scene, evidence for police and the suspect, and increased public awareness of policing. The disadvantages include invasion of privacy during intimate situations, does not provide the whole picture leaving out the pre/post events of the case, provides the public with skewed visuals, and might prevent some officers from intervening in high stake
Program Outputs With the implementation of body worn cameras, it has the potential to positively influence law enforcement-community relations, the efficiency of the court system, and relieve overcrowding in prisons. The use of body worn cameras will decrease citizen’s complaints, use of force incidents, and the caseloads for attorneys. The video footage that is collected by officers wearing body worn camera can provide better cases and has an exceptional tool in prosecuting domestic violence offenders, especially involving victims who are hesitant to testify.
This “Cam” be a Great Idea According to Junior Scholastic“ In August 2014, Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, was fatally shot by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri.” If the police don’t wear body cameras how are we supposed to know what happens to Michael Brown. If the police do then we will know what happend. Junior Scholastic also say that “ In court, the jury can see what exactly happened.”
Police and body cameras 2.) Body cameras 3.) Police accountability 4.) Wearable devices in police work 5.) Police misconduct 6.)
In 2017, more than a thousand people have died from police shootings, none of the cases have enough evidence to show whether police were defending themselves or if he or she just shot for no reason. Body cameras can reduce violence. Like for an example, in the media today, stories about police officers shooting people down, officers wearing body cameras are sixty-six percent less likely to use force. It also will help de-escalate a confrontation between officers and civilians.(einvestigator) When people are being recorded, they modify their behavior. Body cameras are a great thing to have, but they can only do so much for the officer.
Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.
So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for
Stranded, the storm left many deceased and those who survived, barely made it out live. Jon Krakauer the author of Into Thin Air lived this experience first hand. Ever since a kid Jon Krakauer wanted to climb Everest. Finally, he gets his chance but things don’t go as expected. This book is a great read and it will leave you wondering how the author survived in these horrid conditions.
Undoubtedly, body-worn cameras for law-enforcement professionals are a good idea, as they have the potential to ameliorate the patterns of racial and social prejudice that has been haunting police and other public institutions for decades. Crime has become particularly pervasive, and the society calls for implementing more robust evidence-based methods of deterrence and criminal justice. Body-worn cameras fit perfectly in this context, providing an opportunity for law enforcement professionals to record cases of crime while also keeping officers responsible for what they say or do in relation to racially diverse citizens and crime suspects. The presence of body-worn camera can be fairly considered as a factor of deterrence for those who plan
Although officers claim they aren’t as unprofessional as everyone says, many people beg to differ. A lot of people have evidence on how they were mistreated, and how the officers weren’t at all professional. Others have been killed, but the idea is still not a law. This thought is that police officers should have to wear body cameras even though it’s been up in the air for a few years. Police should be required to wear the body cameras to protect themselves, and others whenever they are on duty or on involved in something.
From interactions on the street to testifying in open court, an officer’s word is everything. Once that credibility is gone it is almost impossible for that officer to continue in a law enforcement capacity. Body cameras have emerged as a potential solution to the evolving discussion around police trust and legitimacy issues. One benefit of having a body camera is that if a critical incident, officer involved shooting, or accusation of brutality arises, the camera will provide footage from the officer’s point of view that
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
