ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

1513 Words7 Pages

Since March 31st, 1906 , the day the NCAA was founded, it has been making a vast amount of money off of their athletes by selling various items such as jerseys. College athletes are the face of the organization and are one of main reason why most universities are well known. Why college athletes aren't getting paid for their sweat, blood and tears, is the number one argument in today's sport world.
Division one football and basketball are the most watched sports when it comes to the NCAA. These college athletes perform on national television and perform at their peak in order to represent the face of their university. On the other hand, NBA players come out on national television and get paid millions for performing the same task as collegiate athletes. although college athletes are said to receive scholarships, it is usually averaged to be around $25,000 which truly does not cover for all expenses. …show more content…

“That $11 billion deal -- OK, it's $10.8 billion to be exact -- between the NCAA and CBS/Turner Sports for March Madness between 2011 and 2024. We're talking $11 billion for three weekends of television per year. On top of that, there's a new four-year deal with ESPN that pays the BCS $500 million.” (Michael Wilbon). The NCAA makes more than enough funds that would allow them to put their college athletes on pay.
On the other hand, one of the most watched and well known event is march madness. March Madness is a tournament played by Division one universities in which they compete for the NCAA championship and bragging rights. Now let's take a look at the the amount coach Roy Williams of the North Carolina Tarheels, he made a staggering $925,000 in bonuses after his team won first place in the March Madness tournament. Yet, what did the players who won the tournament receive?“The players got awesome T-shirts and hats” (Jesse

Open Document