ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

1513 Words7 Pages

Since March 31st, 1906 , the day the NCAA was founded, it has been making a vast amount of money off of their athletes by selling various items such as jerseys. College athletes are the face of the organization and are one of main reason why most universities are well known. Why college athletes aren't getting paid for their sweat, blood and tears, is the number one argument in today's sport world.
Division one football and basketball are the most watched sports when it comes to the NCAA. These college athletes perform on national television and perform at their peak in order to represent the face of their university. On the other hand, NBA players come out on national television and get paid millions for performing the same task as collegiate athletes. although college athletes are said to receive scholarships, it is usually averaged to be around $25,000 which truly does not cover for all expenses. …show more content…

“That $11 billion deal -- OK, it's $10.8 billion to be exact -- between the NCAA and CBS/Turner Sports for March Madness between 2011 and 2024. We're talking $11 billion for three weekends of television per year. On top of that, there's a new four-year deal with ESPN that pays the BCS $500 million.” (Michael Wilbon). The NCAA makes more than enough funds that would allow them to put their college athletes on pay.
On the other hand, one of the most watched and well known event is march madness. March Madness is a tournament played by Division one universities in which they compete for the NCAA championship and bragging rights. Now let's take a look at the the amount coach Roy Williams of the North Carolina Tarheels, he made a staggering $925,000 in bonuses after his team won first place in the March Madness tournament. Yet, what did the players who won the tournament receive?“The players got awesome T-shirts and hats” (Jesse

Show More
Related
787 Words | 4 Pages

The players lack free will, the greatest luxury in college life. Their souls are in a binding contract, where the NCAA wrote the rules with mal intent. Many supporters of the NCAA would say their players are amateurs and therefore to keep them safe from other powers, it is best the schools do not pay them. Ordinarily, this would only be true if they treated them as amateurs in any way. The players, as previously stated, spend nearly as much time playing their sport as a job and the NCAA makes about $900 million, according to the NCAA.

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

According to Michael Wilbon of ESPN said that the NCAA signed a contract with CBS Sports that spans from 2011-2024 and costed the NCAA $10.8 billion. That contract will pay the NCAA about $830 million dollars per year. So the profit for NCAA is at least $1 billion dollars in a span of 3 weeks of basketball. So where does this money go obviously it goes somewhat to the players but it mainly goes to the university, I think athletes should directly get that money so they can pay for stuff that they need during their time at college. According to Joe Nocera of the New York Times, if college athletes were paid there might be a less likely chance of scandals like the one at Miami University.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

In 2013, the NCAA made $770 million dollars from the NCAA tournament, a three week basketball tournament to determine the national champion of college basketball (D’Alessandro). Not a single player playing in this tournament did not see a single cent of this revenue. Many analysts and people in the sports business have debated on if college athletes should be paid. With the growth of collegiate sports, the NCAA should pay their athletes a percentage of their profit because the athletes are the reason why the NCAA make a profit, and college athletes have to work hard to maintain their studies and their physical fitness. This, also, could affect how many years that college players stay in college.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

The selling of television rights to different networks makes up a large percentage of the NCAA’s revenue. “Most NCAA revenue (81 percent projected for 2012-13) comes from media rights, mostly from a $10.8 billion, 14-year agreement with CBS Sports and Turner Broadcasting for rights to the Division I Men’s Basketball Championship. Most of the remaining revenue comes from NCAA championships, primarily ticket sales” (Revenue) During the “march madness” mens basketball tournament CBS and Turner made over one billion dollars by selling television advertisements at a price of 700,000 dollars for thirty seconds. (Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?)

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be compensated because players put in hard work, NCAA makes money from the players and coaches get paid College players should be compensated because NCAA makes money from them. The NCAA is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization that just happens to be a billion-dollar industry, raking in $740 million per year from broadcasting rights for March Madness alone. According to U.S. News, the NCAA generates $11 billion in revenue annually, with 50 colleges exceeding $50 million in annual revenue. NCAA makes money as a non-profit organization. Allso, the players get a lot of attention for the school.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Should college athletes be paid it states that, “In the past 12 years, the money generated by the two sports has increased nearly 300%”, which means that with time, colleges are just earning more and more money while players aren’t being paid. Some people may argue that athletes shouldn’t be paid, because they are getting their scholarships paid for. In the article Pay to play: Should college athletes be paid it says how Athletes receive scholarships for $200,000 over 4 years. This is good for the players because scholarships can cost a heavy amount. Although, if I were Division one and I knew there was a great possibility of going to a professional league and the only reason as to why I am in that college is to get into the professional league, not for education.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be paid their proper due for a number of reasons. They have to perform day in and day out to meet both academic standards and to upkeep their game. Many opponents to the idea of paying players don’t realize the amount of time the students putting into the sport. NCAA Division I athletes who are defined as a private, nonprofit association consisting of over 1000 members.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The average full tuition for a four-year university is around $141 thousand and college athletes still believe they need to be paid. Having your tuition paid for is already a high salary to start with, but to say “I should be paid to play” is very overrated. Joel Bush in his report, Student or Professional Athlete - Tax Implications in the United States if College Athletes Were to be Classified as Paid Employees, he explains how many thousands of dollars a college offers to an athlete and how they stack up to the

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA made more money in 2014 than the NBA and NHL. But the college athletes saw none of that money. People who don't believe college athletes should be paid argue that they get to go to school for free. They are right, but is that really enough? College athletes are seen as professional athletes but they are not paid like them.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Recently, the NCAA and CBS signed a $10.8 billion television agreement over 14 years. The NCAA is also considered a non-profit company. Not only that, athletic programs bring in hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars each year. Through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, and anything else with a price tag, these athletes are symbols for their school and their program. Now the problem of this argument is that not all sport teams are profitable.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

This raises the question: do college athletes deserve to be paid? To the untrained eye, college athletes receive an education, coaches make a living, and the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) keeps the well oiled machine running. The NCAA is simply an association of institutions and members which provide pathways of opportunity

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

The college pays for the athletes books, food, and dorm. These college athletes don’t realize that they get to go to school for free and play the sport that they love. They want to be paid by having money in their pocket. The NCAA would not want to pay athletes to maintain the amateur status of its reputation. Even with a full

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes also work extremely hard, and make a lot of money for their schools, NCAA. This is different from professional sports they don't make not one dime of money for themselves, or for their family's. Most of theses players won't make it to the pros, and the colleges just use them for their ability, and do not give them any

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

Related Topics

Open Document