ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Paid

447 Words2 Pages

College Athlete Compensation

Why are we letting college athletes go hungry? Did you know college athletes put about 40 hours a week into their sports and they never really get paid (college athletes deserve). Even though they make millions of dollars a year for their universities they don't get a dime (hoop dream). College athletes should get compensated because their scholarships don't fully cover their student needs.

The NCAA refutes most of these arguments by saying their student athletes, but with the work they put in shouldn't students go first (hoop dream).UConn the winner of the NCAA championship last year had a graduation rate of just 8% for their male athletes. so how can they really be students if they don't even finish their education (sportspeople).if the so called student …show more content…

college athletes have jerseys, video games and tons of sports apparel with their faces and names on it and don't even have a choice (30 For 30).how are these students greedy? Then you also have the fact that colleges treat them as property. They throw their faces and names across merchandise, but if a student was to sell their jersey it would break NCAA rules (30 For 30). NCAA says their amateurs they don't need to get paid. These athletes are far from amateurs they can compete with world class athletes. At the end of the year a few college athletes get invited to the Olympics’ for their sport so if they're the best in the world there is no way they are amateurs. Amateur’s also don't put in up to 40 hours a week. Most students who have jobs don't put that many hours into their job and they're getting paid (college athletes deserve). Calling college athletes amateur's is just a way the NCAA can get by without compensating their student

Show More
Related
1036 Words | 5 Pages

In the documentary schooled: the price of college sports I learned that the NCAA does not treat student athletes like employees but these students are treated like slaves it all started in 1971 when the young Caucasian man by name of started playing college football for TSU, he was the running back for the team and when he caught the ball in running he was hit by two other players from the opposing team which caused him to be paralyzed for the rest of his life. Most of the players feel that they should be paid for playing college sports but the NCAA believes that a student who gets a full scholarship to play any sport at a university should not be paid because they are being paid with a free education, room, and board, and free meals, the NCAA

Read More
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone in the nation knows of at least one college athlete. Many people have a favorite school and in many cases that is because they either have grown up watching that college team or even attended that school. Most people in the country think that college athletes are important to the school and to our lives because they provide the country with some sort of entertainment. As many sports fans know, college athletes are not allowed to be paid to play until they reach ‘the league’. Some people would even say that these athletes deserve some type of pay, some deserve a scholarship raise, and some think what the athletes are receiving right now is plenty.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

Athletes need to get paid because they put in work on the team.” The N.C.A.A of amateurism in college athletics has come to border on farce” (YANKAH). Because college is to learn to get and education.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

This is a preposterous idea, anyhow the athletes get paid to be a student in the form of a scholarship, which

Read More
1560 Words | 7 Pages

According to Marc Edelman, “An average division one college athlete puts in about 43.3 hours per week, bouncing from the field/court, weight room, and film session, that is more about 3.3 hours more that the average full-time job and they receive a salary. “(2014, para 3) And yet all they can receive, is a pat on the back and a “good job” compliment. While these athletes are bringing in massive amounts of money into their schools on a daily basis, the athletes only get to see that the money goes to their coaches, facilities, and school, which is not terrible but still could be better for the amount of money they bring in.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

The film “Schooled” makes many arguments to support the claim that the NCAA is taking advantage of college athletes. One way the NCAA has the ability to control these athletes is by giving these student athletes the title of amateurs. This title of amateur says that the athletes will be playing for the love of the game and not for money. This also means that the athletes will be offered something priceless in exchange for their playing abilities, which is a free education. During this time as an athlete these students are not able to persue any other kind of income since all of their time is taken up by participating in their sport and followed by school.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Paid

Related Topics

Open Document