The Pros And Cons Of Colonization Of South America

739 Words3 Pages

Colonization is the migration of people from different countries with an idea to rule the land that has already been established by existing, indigenous people. These people usually use their resources to make the natives obey them. In Africa, many other nations, including Europe, did just that; they used their better resources to take advantage of the land and the natives. South America is struggling to establish growth in some of its countries, and have major problems in increasing development. Some people would want to colonize and make South America great again, but it would be against the best interest of the United States and South America to do so. Therefore, the United States should not colonize South America because of the loss of …show more content…

For example, “many people, even in the non-centralized areas, fought colonial control with every means at their disposal.….Although they had some success, the British put down the movement by arresting its leaders and destroying their villages” (Manzo, 2012, p.19). This proves that during colonization in Africa, the British took the natives’ freedom by using any forces necessary to remain in control, even if it meant taking away the freedom to fight for independence. This is what would likely happen if the U.S. were to selfishly colonize South America in order to claim the land for themselves. According to Duffy and Manners (1961), Africans have been tortured and incarcerated for their beliefs and feel like strangers in their own homeland. This suggests that just because the Africans wanted to speak their mind against injustices, they were imprisoned in their own country. The rulers took away their independence. This may happen if the U.S. were to colonize South America because the U.S. has more power and influence similar to Britain. In addition to taking away their free will, South America has problems with