The tough decision of if I would want to die from a terminal disease in a year or be a part of a cryogenics experiment that could save my life in one hundred years is mainly based on my cultural learning through religion. My cultural learning has also been influenced through my education, family, and my many mentors. To begin the cryogenics experiment has very little positives and a lot of negatives for myself in mind. I’ll begin with the main positive point being obviously that in a hundred years the disease will more than likely be cured so my life would be saved, I’d also be able to see how everything has evolved (i.e. technology, medical evolutionary ideas, and etc.), and be able to live in a time where society is equal to all (at least I’d hope). The negatives of cryonics experiment would be that it’s an experiment meaning that everything is questionable - I could not live through the process or have side effects due to the experiment, if everything went well I would most likely go through culture shock, my family and friends would be long gone by then meaning I’d be completely alone. …show more content…
The negatives for this being; I would die before my twenty-second birthday meaning I would not be able to do what I had planned out for my life, I’d most likely be thinking about what was to come constantly, and I’d know throughout the year that I would never be able to live a full life. The positives of dying in a year would be that I would know that I had a year to live meaning that I could try and accomplish as many things on my bucket list as possible (i.e. traveling, skydiving, and etc), spend quality time with my my friends and family, and religiously I believe that death is not the end but the