Although DNA evidence has become increasingly acceptable over the past years, there are still challenges that can question its admissibility. One reason in particularly is the progression of technology. As technology advances, it can pioneer unconventional methods to test DNA and because members of criminal law are not DNA experts, it can cause concerns. As result, when DNA evidence is considered admissible an outline for new discovered methods that was used to test the DNA evidence should be submitted. Moreover, analysts are required to supply copies of all laboratory results and reports to the court and the defense. The reports should provide detailed information such as an explanation of arithmetic probability calculations, lab errors, and documentation showing when the evidence changed hands and to whom. When everyone has access to information to inform them about the unknown, it can eliminate skepticism. Furthermore, it provides testimony that the DNA sample was not tampered with or altered. …show more content…
The program has been unified as a statute for every states’ rules and regulations for DNA. To highlight, it is evident that the testing of DNA is relevantly new and has not been considered a fundamental aspect since the beginning of criminal justice. Crime is no secret in the United States and since it has been visible before the thought of DNA testing, the program serves a great purpose. The program targets cases that could not use the advantages that the method administers. Since the operation of the program in the early 2000, a significant amount of people convicted of crimes have been exonerated of all charges (Postconviction DNA Testing, 2017). The ability to use this new-found technique to analysis DNA of crime scene evidence that was not tested at the time of the trial, offers encouragement to right the wrongs of the criminal justice