ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs

670 Words3 Pages

If the bombs were not dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States would have lost at least one million American soldiers in a mainland invasion of Japan (Tucker, 5). That stated, dropping the bombs was the only viable option for sparing both American lives, as well as Japanese lives. The dropping of the bombs, albeit horrific, is justifiable because it saved millions of both American and Japanese lives, prevented the waste of valuable resources, and played a significant role in Japan's surrender. Dropping the bombs saved more lives than if the United States had done a land invasion (Walker, 5). If the war had been prolonged, the United States would have lost millions of lives (Tucker, 5); but the Japanese would also suffer. By prolonging the war, the Japanese would lose numerous soldiers' lives, but also its innocent citizens, due to starvation (Tucker, 6). The Japanese were already in the “dire straits”, they were on tight resources (Walker, 7). A land invasion would have made it worse for both sides. With both options sufficient lives would have been lost; However, with the Manhattan Project successfully creating an atomic bomb, it would have been a waste of time, money, and material resources to have it go unused. …show more content…

Dwight D. Eisenhower said, “It wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing.” (Alperovitz, 3). Curtis LeMay agreed, saying, “The war would have been over in two weeks… The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.” (Alperovitz, 4). The Japanese were practically defeated with limited resources (Alperovitz, 6); so the war would have ended quickly without a bomb (Walker, 7). Especially if the Soviets attacked, as Japanese leaders feared Soviet power (Alperovitz, 7). While some military leaders were against any use of the bombs, it was a necessary decision to spare many more casualties for Americans and the

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of Dropping Atomic Bombs

310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More

Ww2 Dbq Essay

522 Words | 3 Pages

If the war had not ended, "millions more Allied soldiers," would die, according to Ally Soldier William Guarnere in Document 6. If the bomb was not dropped, Allied soldiers would have to attack Tokyo, which would cause millions of casualties and continue the war. If the war continued and the soldiers attacked in Tokyo “casualties on both sides,” would have easily surpassed the number of deaths from the bomb, according to Bill Dietrich, a Seattle Times Reporter, in Document 7. America had to protect the lives of their soldiers, and they did so by dropping a bomb and ending a war. In short, the atomic bomb aided in the war ending and ultimately saved as many lives as it ended, therefore making it a necessary component for WWII.

Read More

How Did The Us Affect The Bombing Of Pearl Harbor Dbq

1214 Words | 5 Pages

According to Document G, a memoir of General H. H. Arnold, whether or not the bombs were dropped, the Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering. The United States had already killed about 241,000 people, wounded 313,000, and destroyed about 2,333,000 homes, making it increasingly evident that their decision to drop the bomb was just a selfish and easy manner to end the war. The document also states that the air force was aware that the destruction of most Japanese industries and the prevention of the arrival of the incoming cargo had made it impossible for Japan to carry out a large-scale war. With this fact, the knowledge of their increasing vulnerability was in effect throughout the military and the white house, bringing to light the leverage the United States had going through with the bombings. Overall, the decision to drop the bombs can be viewed as unnecessary as the U.S could have kept fighting knowing that

Read More

1988 Dbq Essay

496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More

World War 2 Dbq Essay

1035 Words | 5 Pages

The strategy of the war was to destroy the Japanese military by any means necessary. The total manpower of the US was more than the Japanese so bombing was not the only option. There was a costlier yet more humane way to do this that was not reliant on the atomic bomb. On the down side millions of lives just on the American side would be lost. Also, the longer the fighting the more likely communism was to spread and then the task would be more to handle than the US felt they could alone.

Read More

1945 Dbq Essay

791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More

To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More

Why We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

985 Words | 4 Pages

So, Truman made the difficult but necessary decision to drop the first atomic bombs. The mass destruction caused the Japanese to realize that they had already lost the war, and they needed to give up. All in all, the action taken by President Harry S. Truman was the right decision because it ended the war and saved American soldiers’

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

699 Words | 3 Pages

First of all, dropping the bombs would end the war more quicker. This was a necessity because this bomb would save more lives than it took because the Japanese would not stop fighting. This is shown in the Potsdam Declaration where the Japanese rejected the offer of surrender (Doc 1). The Potsdam Declaration occurred on July 26th, 1945, and was an ultimatum made by The U.S., China, and Great Britain calling for the surrender of Japan. The terms consisted of Japan’s surrender, outside occupation of

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq

513 Words | 3 Pages

If the atomic bomb were not dropped the war would have lasted longer, ending in more lives lost and wasted materials. Another reason that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified is, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with pearl harbor, They had it coming with damage done to them. “A Kamikaze Pilot's Manual” (Document #9) In the three pictures you can see the horrifying pearl harbor attack summed up in only 3 images, before, during, and the aftermath.

Read More

Atomic Bombing Dbq

1327 Words | 6 Pages

However, this is a weak defence when taking Japan’s imminent defeat and peace efforts, as well as the likelihood of Japan’s surrender before the land invasion, into consideration. Furthermore, the usage of the bombs only accelerated the surrender of an already defeated enemy and resulted in high civilian casualty rates. This, along with the ulterior motives in the bomb’s usage, undermines any kind of justification even further. The usage of the atomic bombs was both highly immoral and militarily unnecessary, and had no function in bringing the war to an

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

650 Words | 3 Pages

If they dropped the atomic bomb on Japan, they would not have to worry about them fighting back and would not have to keep making more weapons just to defeat the Japanese. It is expensive to manufacture weapons over and over, dropping the atomic bomb would just be a one time thing and it would save time as well. Also, If the Americans and Japanese fought on the island of Kyushu, then more Americans would die as well, if they dropped the atomic bomb then lots of lives would be saved. Also, Nicholas Kristoff said that military officials were likely to fight on, furiously, until the end willing to "Sacrifice 20 million Japanese lives," as late as August of 1945.” (Doc. I)

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq

414 Words | 2 Pages

We had given the Japanese plenty of opportunities to surrender and they didn 't. We had warned them that if they didn 't surrender there would be utter mass destruction placed upon them. They chose to ignore it and brush it off. Japan still didn 't surrender after the first bomb was dropped, the emperor of Japan stepped in and gave the final decision of surrendering only after the second one was dropped. This war would’ve gone on for who knows how

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

927 Words | 4 Pages

If the United States never dropped the atomic bomb then soldiers would have had to invade Japan which would result in a large number of casualties. “I have been convinced that we saved more lives than we took. It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and not used it and let a million more people die”(Source 8). Due to the Japanese bushido mentality, they were never going to surrender, and they would fight until the last man was standing. “The Japanese had demonstrated near-fanatical resistance, fighting to almost the last man on Pacific islands, committing mass suicide on Saipan, and unleashing kamikaze attacks at Okinawa”(Source 11).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs

Related Topics

Open Document