ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Ethnic Federalism

762 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Merits and demerits of ethnic federalism

Among the major critics against ethnic federalism as an instrument of conflict management, is the risk that ethnic autonomy consolidates ethnic identity while providing incentives for ethnic elites to engage in a politics of division and amplification of grievances leading to recurrent discrimination and violence. This risk grows as urbanization brings ever increasingly diverse group of people to live in a close proximity.
To understand how effective Ethnic-federalism is in conflict management and preventing discrimination based on ethnic identity. This study surveyed the perception, experience and understanding of residents in the two cities.
Results reveal that a significant number of people feel they have experienced discrimination based on their ethics identity. 38% of respondents say they have been discriminated because of their ethnic identity at least once in the past 5 years. This discrimination includes a verbal or physical harassment and/or having to be denied of service or opportunities by a fellow citizen, a public servant or a private business owner. However, there is no visible disparity between ethnic Oromos and those who are of a different ethnic group. While more non-Oromo experienced …show more content…

While only 10% of those who have experienced discrimination say it has happened extremely regularly (at least once a week), a majority 56% say it happens very rarely (once a month or less). The remaining 24% and 20% say it happens regularly (once to three times a month) and rarely respectively. This is still a very high number considering the country has a strong law against hate speech and discrimination based on ethnic identity. Old derogatory classifications and name callings are forbidden by law and can lead to court cases for group insult (International Crisis Group 2009). However, Only 3% of respondents said they have reported such incidents to the police or brought their case to

Show More
Related
298 Words | 2 Pages

The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

Because of the strict division between the two types of government, dual federalism is sometimes called layer-cake federalism. Southern states including Texas conflicted with national government because at the time, federalism was trying to involve the touch of civil rights but the southern states wanted to maintain a segregated society because it’s important and necessary for our political and economy. As conservatives made many political inroads during the 1970s, a new concept of federalism, which was kind of an old concept of federalism, became popular. It was called, the New Federalism. Block grants was one of the way to give the state more power by allowing states to decide what to do with federal money.

Read More
2361 Words | 10 Pages

A president is truly affective when he is able to get his policy agenda through Congress. For him to do this, it is paramount that he has the support from the majority of the public. When a president is unpopular, members of Congress will have little incentive to pass his preferred legislation, since doing so will potentially have negative consequences for them (i.e. not winning reelection). It is also important that the president be a competent negotiator if he is to get his agenda passed. It is unrealistic for a president to expect that he will get all aspects of a particular agenda item passed without making his concessions.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

1. Chart the changes in federalism throughout American history. What was dual federalism? How was governmental power distributed under this system? How did the Great Depression lead to the decline in dual federalism?

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

Conservatives stand next to Duel federalism because they want a clean cut in the distribution of responsibilities, giving the state's control over their rules but having some constitutional purposes. This would cause a tense relationship between the state and nation because there will be strict limits established. Their attitudes encourage their states’ right is to reserve to the states all rights not specifically conferred on the national government by the constitution. They support limiting Congress to its enumerated powers (10th Amendment). On the other hand, liberals stand for cooperative federalism because they acknowledge a need for cooperation between the state and federal government by routinely sharing power and not having a concentrated

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists were property owners, creditors, and merchants. They believed that elites were the most fit to govern. They feared "excessive democracy" because they thought uneducated people would get into office. Federalists favored a strong national government and they believed in "filtration," which was when only elites could obtain governmental power. The leaders of the Federalist party were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and George Washington.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Discrimination has plagued the world since the beginning of time and continues to happen today. People can be discriminated against simply for looking different or following different customs. It has been implemented by governments throughout history, but it has also been practiced individually. “In Response to Executive Order 9066” and “Legal alien” are two poems that discuss the topic of discrimination. “In Response to Executive Order 9066,” by Dwight Okita is a poem that describes the possible interment of a Japanese-American during World War 2.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Over the year’s federalism has taken on many forms within our federal system. The distribution of powers within these many forms of federal systems has had to adapt to each of these forms in order to keep up with the times. The federal system initially was set up to serve the 13 original colonies and was able to maintain their own powers given by the powers vested in each colonies individual constitutions. Federalism or the split of power between colonies and the federal or nation governing body was simply to form agreements among one another in regards to laws. The state governments possessed the powers given to them by their state constitutions which was known as reserved powers and concurrent powers were state and federal government

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Naomi Klein's novel, This Changes Everything highlights the most imperative actions that need to be taken towards climate change. Klein discusses that as a society we overlook the causes and the changes that need to happen to the systems that are making the crisis inevitable. She encourages formulating a mass movement for climate change that supports changes in the economic system. Klein’s main argument is that, most people think that climate change is a threat, “we have not done the things that are necessary to lower emissions because those things fundamentally conflict with deregulated capitalism” which is the “reigning ideology” of our time (p.18). The purpose of the book is that Klein is supplying society with a challenge: are we on the right path, are we doing the right things for ourselves and for the future, or is this the best we can be?

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

I stand with Anti-Federalism I stand with Anti-Federalism due to the fact they were not completely opposed to federalism, but wanted to improve it. They leaned towards the states having the power. There is nothing wrong with the constitution but the essence in the bill of rights plays a role in our personal day to day rights and our country would not be at its full potential, or a super power without it. I believe the anti-federalist are open minded, and a nation with an open mind will be successful.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

Federalism is simultaneously one of the most foundational and perplexing constitutional principles of American democracy because of its intentional ambiguity. The debate over federalism has persisted from the framers to the current day policymakers. However, the terms on which the debate has played out have changed over time. The intentional ambiguity placed in the Constitution by the framers has directly contributed to the abuse of federalism and the decline in the power of the states.

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

Every year “children” in America suffer hunger. To help out kids in America, Ikea has started donating. like Ikea many other companies with different programs have been set up to help kids. Many studies have shown that kids are often without food. So in order to help these kids have a better life, people could to volunteer by donating food to different programs.

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

1. Examine the positive and negative effects of federalism on racial and ethnic groups in the United States (Chapter 3). To understand how federalism has positive and negative consequences on racial and ethnic groups you need to know what federalism is. Federalism effects state and local governments. State and Local governments make policies that affect the residents which in turn influence the "politics of race and ethnicity...the higher the concentration of racial and ethnic minority population in a state or local area, the greater the impact of racial and ethnic minorities exert on their government". pg58 Some of the negative effects of federalism can have on racial and ethnic groups are noticeable in such instances as, our voting procedures.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Ethnic Federalism

Related Topics

Open Document