The Pros And Cons Of GMO Labeling

1194 Words5 Pages

Despite the fact that GMOs can contaminate the food supply and threaten food security, not all nations regulate GMOs. Some EU nations ban the cultivation of GE crops but import GE crops, such as animal feed. Collectively, the EU is the largest consumer of GMOs. Nations that have a total or partial ban on GMOs include France, Australia, China, India, Germany, Mexico, and Russia. Algeria, Belize, and Turkey are among the many nations that ban the cultivation of GMOs. Russia completely banned importing and cultivating GMOs in 2014 with the only exception being scientific research and projects. Nations allow the cultivation of GMOs include the United States, South Africa, Australia, China, India, Argentina, and Mexico. Some nations require GM products to fully disclose all GE ingredients as a part of laws regarding the labeling of GMOs. Twenty-eight nations that require the labeling of GMOs are in the EU. The EU requires labeling if the product was genetically altered throughout the whole process. Some less restrictive nations only require labeling if the nutritional value is changed as a result of altering DNA. The FDA in the United States supported this regulatory labeling system because two products, one being GE and the other being …show more content…

There are several methods and technologies to prevent outcrossing. Scientists developed a technology known as T-Gurt. T-GURT technology prevents the movement of genetically modified traits because there is a procedure for activation of these traits. If the trait in T-GURT technology isn’t activated, the engineered trait isn’t expressed. Traits have to be activated to be passed on to other species. Another method to prevent outcrossing is through buffer zones. The estimated width of the buffer zones would be from 6 to 30 meters. While buffer zones are a viable option to prevent outcrossing, farmers would be losing lots of farmable