ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

940 Words4 Pages

Gun control has allegedly been taken into consideration as an extra controversial topic in the USA these days. And it can be interpreted as the various laws and policies that regulate and modify everything related to the possession and the use firearms by civilians. The governments have to limit the accessibility of weapons and set a strict restriction on what form of guns are available for purchase.
Within the latest years, the problems of weapon managing have escalated and become more sensitive and touchy situation to discuss as it includes the problems of brutality and numerous of others forbidden actions revolve around weapons, in which led to multiple fatal cases of casualties. In addition, as well as the troubles of personal protection …show more content…

Cohen carefully examines the second amendment and why it’s outdated, and a threat to liberty and many others misfortunes. Weapons were around for completely long-term and even dated all the way back to centuries ago. The majority of people love being able to have the freedom to do what they need and in particular whilst they are able to own something that makes them feel advanced and powerful like a gun. This brings up the flaws of the 2nd amendment. The Second Amendment states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” I ought to see some troubles with this amendment. The first being nowhere does it set forth and has a definite definition of “Arms.” This includes machine guns, landmines, and dirty bombs and etc. The second reason and the last being are to the people who have never caught a case deemed worthy of a felony, then that person is eligible to purchase “firearms.” For instance, if any members of the cartel that pose a clean record, then they are eligible to buy all these heavy assault rifles” Sure, the Founders knew that the world evolved and that technology changed, but the weapons of today that are easily accessible are vastly different than anything that existed in 1791”(Cohen). The cartels recruit those young innocent and naïve people on the street to match in with them and they may be trained to be ready to carry out larger missions. Although, gun control advocates may claim that their possession of firearm exists mainly for protection, however, not many people obey and follow the designated

Show More
Related
244 Words | 1 Pages

The second amendment is an amendment to the United States of America’s constitution on control of guns. It allows for a well-regulated militia as a necessity to security of a free state without limiting the right of the people to own guns (Lithwick). Daniel J. Schultz interprets the intended meaning of this amendment based the terms used in the amendment. Schultz notes that the term “well-regulated” as used in the second amendment brings some misunderstanding.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Cronin critique proposals offering regulation, but eventually sided with President Obama’s proposal as a starting point to reduce bloodshed. He believes it may prove effective by reducing the amount of lives lost while ensuring that it does not do anything to affect the protection of his family. Cronin’s intent was to make opponents of recent proposals consider what exactly will change and how their current needs will not be met. This thesis offers the reader a chance to reflect on the problem, widespread accessibility to firearms, and on the proposed solutions to limit the access of weapons to those that are lawfully obtaining guns and are not following the already set

Read More
1853 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment forms part of the 10 ratified amendments of the constitution which form the Bill of Rights and was enabled by the United States Congress in December 1791. The amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” . These twenty-seven words have been the focus of much debate and lobbying not just within the three branches of government but across the whole of the United States. It is the most controversial topic regarding the American Constitution and has become an emotive subject with two very distinct camps of thought. The one side of the debate, the loud minority, arguing for and protecting their constitutional

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

The Brady Handgun Control Act made it progressively more troublesome and attempting procedure to buy and own a firearm. Firearm control backers say this is insufficient, that in spite of the fact that gun related occurrences have declined since its authorization harder laws are required or more demonstrations of gun savagery will keep on plagueing the country. Expert firearm promoters see weapon control laws as just a path for the legislature to control its subjects. The genuine civil argument, for both sides, comes down to who ought to possess a weapon and under what confinements would it be advisable for them to have the capacity to have it?

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

They discuss how different rules and regulations make it difficult for the Second Amendment to remain significant. They also address gun-neutral laws and whether the Second Amendment is applicable to events like assault or disturbing the peace. I found their stance interesting and useful for my paper. This

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment is a frequently debated topic in today’s society. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791 when the Bill of Rights were passed. The Amendment was easily accepted because of the majority consensus that the government should not have the ability to take weapons away from people. In many countries, corrupt governments use armed soldiers and other arms to control and oppress people.

Read More
1187 Words | 5 Pages

It is interesting to note that today’s ardent gun advocates purposely ignore the first part of this amendment (A well regulated militia being necessary for to the security of a free State) and only quote the second part (…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed). They know that the militia idea is unappealing in a civilized society and that this amendment as it is written 200 years ago does not make sense

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

The second amendment and gun control are one of the highly debated topics in the United States. Many people argue that second amendment is dangerously leading to gun violence and it should be controlled to avoid further unfortunate incidents. While on the other hand, others believe that right to bear arm is very important because it protects them from criminals. But isn’t people’s life more worthy than right to carry guns? So,the U.S government should find the best way to make strong and effective gun laws and lessen gun use to protect people from gun violence.

Read More
1645 Words | 7 Pages

The Second Amendment gives us the privilege to have guns. The problem with this, is that these written rules were created under different circumstances than today. The fathers intended for Americans to own guns for the sport of hunting and providing for families as well as security for themselves and their loved ones, but Americans are taking advantage of this law everyday. School shootings, robberies, and poaching are just a few examples of gun misconducts that are becoming increasingly prominent in the U.S.. A solution is found best in an article by USA.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Thus, I recognized that gun ownership is a serious social problem. This problem surely threatens ordinary people’s lives in the United States. To handle this problem, I did some research about the

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " This amendment gives U.S. citizens the right to possess firearms. However, this amendment also is blurred, and it does not state distinctly. “Whether this provision protects the individual’s right to own firearms or whether it deals only with the collective right of the people to arm and maintain a militia has long been debated.”

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

To go forth, the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action states that the government is banning guns such as rifles which lack the capacity to cause mass murders (Ridder). Basically, these guns serve the purpose of simply entertainment and cannot amount to the menace of the criminal use of firearms. Undoubtedly, this article demonstrates how the government’s use of gun control laws is acting on a lack of understanding of the banned object. Moreover, the government should not ban guns such as rifles

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document