ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

1860 Words8 Pages

The notion of humanitarian intervention has been the most debated concept over the past years. This concept has been tracked about every act of violence and aggression in history. This intervention are mainly for humanitarian purposes by military means undertaken by one state or a group of states in the territory of another state known to both with no question of the right of state to impose severe economic sanctions in response to human tragedy. For one thing is that states have long meddled in the affairs of other states, this meddling has been motivated mostly by economic interests, in some cases by tribal religious views and some cases simply for power . The essence of international politics is that there is no such thing as the international …show more content…

About 20 years ago we saw what happened to countries when UN collective Security fails and violence is unchecked. In October 1994, just a few weeks after the Rwandan civil war ended, the UN deployed need to Rwanda to investigate genocide associated violations in support of the UN Security Council’s commissioner expert which was formed by the secretary …show more content…

By comparing the number of definitions and explanations, at least it seems contradictory definition of humanitarian intervention, which gives the Institute for International Affairs of the Kingdom of Denmark: "Humanitarian intervention is strong action taken by the State including the use of armed force, to or in another country, without the consent of its government, with or without UN Security

Open Document