ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Internet Filtering

768 Words4 Pages

Filtering Software

Ever wonder why a certain website or page just won’t open? This could happen for many reasons, but the most likely reason is that that page is being restricted or filtered, whether it be because of an inappropriate page or could show certain things not suitable for children. Many schools and parents at home try to protect their students or children from witnessing inappropriate things on the internet or prevent young children from going on dangerous or unsuitable sites. Many argue that having restrictions on the internet could interfere with a child’s learning, or overblock sites that could be useful, but seen as inappropriate by the filters or restrictions. Yet internet filtering isn’t just to help students …show more content…

Many adults, including parents and teachers, believe they can provide more protection for their children or students without restricting them from their education. As helpful as parents and teachers may be, the internet can be more efficient and can filter without overblocking or having people need it and not be able to find the necessary information. If parents need to know when their children are online, internet filters can provide logs of the time they were on the internet, and time reactions in order to control the time they have on the internet and there can also be configurations for age appropriateness (Ohlheiser). Filters can have their flaws and not work 100% of the time, but it can help supervise children in order to help with their education. A combination of filtering and adult supervision could work better to supervise children.
Internet filtering can have its flaws, but overall can be very helpful and in some ways a necessity to a student’s education. To keep students from being exposed to harmful things on the internet, internet filters help protect what can be viewed and posted on the internet. A safe and protected internet could really help with the education of young

Show More
Related
370 Words | 2 Pages

Stalking Is Different Than Monitoring In “The Undercover Parent”, by Harlan Coben he argues that parents have a right to monitor their children, by putting spyware on their computers or other devices, making it possible to see what they spend their time doing and to whom they spend their time talking. Though, the way that most teens see it, if a parent is allowing their child onto social media, then they should trust them enough to the point where they shouldn’t have to monitor everything they’re doing. While online, people can definitely change.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

Very good discussion Thomas, I also concur that the purpose of 'ban the box ' is to give an ex-offender a better shot at going farther in You have provided many valid points regarding the use of body cameras by police officers. Indeed that the utilization of body cameras by officers do provide transparency and accountability towards potential and suspect individual in question to include officers ' conduct. The officers must also use good judgment and with plenty of discretion when executing their legal authority to use such device. Like you also mentioned, some witnesses would be reluctant in assisting with the investigation, if they know that video cameras could potentially be release to the public that could result in retribution.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Parents Vs. Internet In the article “ The Undercover Parent,” Coben talks about how parents should monitor their kids. He goes on about the benefits and disadvantages of using spyware by using anecdotes and counterclaims. Coben seems to argue that parents should definitely monitor their kids but he never seems to agree with parents using spyware on an everyday basis.

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

On December 14, 2017, Title II Net Neutrality was repealed. Dictionary.com defines net neutrality as “The concept that broadband Internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to Internet content, platforms, etc., and should not manipulate the transfer of data regardless of its source or destination.” Title II regulations classified the internet as “a public utility,” and “required internet service providers or ISPs to treat the traveling on their networks equally.” These rules were put in place to stop ISPs from “throttling” connection speeds to certain sites, and charging customers for access to the internet through “packages.” Internet service providers, such as Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T, provide access to the internet

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

As some of us might know there has been a passionate debate on the issue of the net neutrality in which there is strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Net neutrality is the idea government should regulate the internet so that the major telecommunications companies won’t be able to turn the internet landscape into a monopoly. This paper will examine both sides of the net neutrality debate in which the content of this paper will explore both the pro and cons of net neutrality. At the end of the paper I will reveal my true thoughts about net neutrality and will discuss what I have learned about this issue in the process. Some of the pros of net neutrality include easy access to information, promotion of free speech and promoting innovation for smaller internet companies.

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

The net neutrality laws that require an ISP to “post,” or “send,” or allow “access” to any content of the subscriber's choosing, are, for all practical purposes, compelled access mandates akin to the Florida right to access statute at issue in Tornillo (Travis, 2006). Even though these mandates do not literally "restrict" an ISP from publishing content of its own choosing, they would compel the ISP to convey or make available content that, in its editorial judgment, it would otherwise choose not to convey or make available. Net neutrality advocates sometimes suggest that today's major broadband ISPs choose to be mere conduits, so that compelled neutrality would not eliminate any editorial function that the ISPs are now performing. ISPs like

Read More
1928 Words | 8 Pages

Americans view net neutrality as a significant issue with ramifications that could affect our country’s future progress. The core of the net neutrality dilemma is whether to tightly regulate companies providing access to the internet (referred to as Internet Service Providers or ISPs) or, instead, to loosen those regulations. Although there has been a public outcry in favor of keeping the current regulations, a considerable number of recent publications argue that loosening net neutrality regulations will benefit the economy in the long term. To start, Mr. Hong and his team researched the effects of loosening regulation of the internet on social welfare. In his conclusion, he advances the proposition that, when there is competition among ISPs, companies that make content available on the internet (referred to as content providers or CPs might do better under looser regulation than they would under current net neutrality regulations.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

“The term “Net Neutrality” stands for the principle that Internet users should have unrestricted access to the content and services on the World Wide Web” (“Net Neutrality” 1033). Net neutrality is essentially a law that allows everyone to have all content on the internet available to them at the same speeds (Borchers). It was initially referred to as the First Amendment of the Internet (Segedin). This seemingly important regulation has been a common spot for debate ever since it was passed.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Brutally Honest: Is It Ok To Spy On Your Kids? Let me ask you this, if you had the chance to save your child’s life by spying on them would you? Yes to some spying might seem like an invasion of privacy, but it’s really just showing that you care. I believe that it is every parent’s job to know what his or her child is doing, no matter how old they might be.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

In order to continue reading this essay, you must purchase an argumentative essay package for only $1.99 a month. Luckily, that won’t actually happen, yet. Thankfully with net neutrality, ISPs won’t be able to impose restrictions like that. However, in a 3-2 vote on December 14th, 2017, the regulations were repealed. With Congress’s estimated approval, net neutrality will officially be repealed in America in the middle of 2018.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

In 2013 congress had not done anything with net neutrality, but the federal communication commission (FCC) had started to look at it in 2010. Then, FCC had issued the net neutrality rules. “The net neutrality has rules that will preserve the internet as an open network enabling consumers choice, freedom of expression, user control, and the freedom to innovate” (“net neutrality” Donna Batten). Net net neutrality is basically going to have the internet as an open the internet and to have unrestricted access to content and services, and that the IPS will have to treat all internet the same.

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

It is the year 2018, Apple has just created an iPhone X, YouTube is having a meltdown, and Google is one of the most popular websites to ask any questions. How could people know this? Why does this matter? For most people living in 2018, this is what they care about. The Millennials and Generation Z kids care about the internet and what happens to it more than they care about newspapers, radio, and television.

Read More
1730 Words | 7 Pages

Net neutrality has improved the overall state of the internet and played a role on the 80 percent of Americans that use the internet ("Internet"). The question is, what exactly is net neutrality? Net neutrality has a central idea that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) "should treat all content flowing through their cables and cell towers equally" (Finley). The value behind this is that ISPs should not discriminate against certain content by providing some content at a faster speed than others. The U.S population, before the Federal Communication Committee (FCC) voted to repeal it on December 2017, had a simple idea of what it was but did not imagine the benefit that it had brought for them.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

The original concept of firewalls was to provide a safe place to conduce affairs without being overly concerned that your network had the possibility of being attacked. This is the same concept that a person has in your home or business, there are secure boundaries with respectable walls, lockable doors and windows and even perhaps an alarm system, so a person should feel secure in a home or business, with a personal or office firewall to protecting and allowing the freedom to conduct life or business. Since most American internet traffic is held within the United States and United States “Great” firewall would cause a few issues average American internet consumers. The United States has only a few central internet locations and backbones that could be used directly for an American “Great” firewall defense sites.

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

That being said, the internet could be a very dangerous thing for children to discover. The internet has many uses and can teach us many great things but letting children use it can lead to bad things, such as changes in attitude, thought process and general health conditions. It could corrupt their minds in ways that may not be suitable for the youth. An example of negative access to the internet would have to violence.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Internet Filtering

Related Topics

Open Document