ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Internet Neutrality

2013 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay about net neutrality

Given the importance of the internet in today’s society, a policy governing its use cannot go undiscussed. The idea of internet neutrality, or net neutrality, has spread over the past few years. Meanwhile, opinions for and against have been argued, but most people still do not understand how this concept could have lasting effects as far reaching as the international realm. As these concepts are debated in the near-term, this topic will grow in importance and will relate even more to the International Political Economy (IPE). In short, the effects of ignored net neutrality will have both domestic and global implications which are liable to promote monopolization of this unique resource. Net neutrality is the principle that all traffic on the …show more content…

ISPs would be able to legally apply quality of service mechanics which would bottleneck services unless they chose to pay the ISP for a “fast lane” to the consumer. Instead of a single pipe with a single speed, the pipe would have divisions that the provider could use to ignore sections of a user’s pipe to prioritize preferred data. This idea stems from the Comcast / Netflix decision in February 2014 to create a direct link between the two (at an undisclosed price) after Comcast had been allegedly throttling Netflix traffic due to the assessed volume of Netflix traffic traversing Comcast’s infrastructure. Due to the lack of restrictions on ISPs, the expectation, and fear, is that providers will use this tactic to create artificial “speed bumps” in data delivery to create more revenue and degrade the overall experience of the internet. Equally troublesome is the ISP’s capability to limit the speed of your data delivery (the “private good” you are leasing from them) based on the amount of roads they must transit outside of their network (Nye & Welch, 2013, p. 194). This transfer of power from the content provider to the delivery system creates a conflict which has not yet been dealt with, and has the promise to echo through the rest of the internet …show more content…

To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act — while at the same time forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services. This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies (Obama,

Show More
Related
2950 Words | 12 Pages

The FCC is a government agency that regulates the radio, television and phone industries. The Federal Communication Commission regulates interstate communication for instance wire, satellite and cable, and international communication. The FCC originated from The Communication Act of 1934, which abolished the Federal radio commission. The Communication Act of 1934 was the barrier for all the communications rules in place today. This act expanded on the authority of the FCC to regulate public airwaves in the United Stated.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Network Neutrality Nuances, David Farber makes a contrasting counterpoint to Barbara van Schewick’s piece of net neutrality protecting us from abuse from our ISPs. Farber states that because the internet has always regulated itself over the course of its nature and is continuing to grow increasingly with no issues, we should continue to let the internet self-regulate. Thus David Farber is suggesting that the government and legislators take a reactive stance on the internet because over the course of the internet’s history it has shown to be growing exponentially. Farber continues to analyze the history of net neutrality and comes to the conclusion that any legislation that attempts to manage the internet will fail due to the incompetence of legislations regarding the internet as demonstrated by history. Farber attempts to inductively explain the pretense behind the legislations against net neutrality; however some of his examples ultimately fail to support his conclusion due to his very apparent position against legislators

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

Two hundred billion dollars—costing roughly two thousand dollars per household in the United States—gone in a puff of smoke, along with a slew of broken promises, reduced regulation, and non-existent culpability. This is the reality of the internet provider industry in the United States. In addition to costing Americans billions in tax breaks and benefits, internet service providers (ISPs), lack of regulation allows ISPs to leverage absurd and unnecessary charges against their customers, as well as arbitrarily cap internet access. Practically every American holds stakes in this outrageous condition, which deserves the utmost attention and action. To that end, Bruce Kushnick, a longtime advocate for consumers of the telecom industries, wrote a book titled $200 Billion Broadband Scandal.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

In the simplest of terms: the FCC rules mean no fast and slow lanes on the internet, no blocking of content, and no provider throttling your streaming video just because it can. (Hong) The only reason he could be against this is if he wanted to make money off of it. It is hard to fathom that someone would be against an internet where you are protected from getting exploited by the

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

One flaw of theirs is Comcast's customer satisfaction. Its customer satisfaction is among the lowest of all cable companies. Comcast in the past was looked down upon for violating

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

Officially known as the Open Internet Order, the law was founded on protecting consumers from ISPs blocking and throttling their speeds. When it was introduced, the FCC said they received more than four million letters from supporters of net neutrality. In a document signed in February 2015, Barack Obama wrote, “Today’s FCC decision will protect innovation and create a level playing field for the next generation of entrepreneurs–and it wouldn’t have happened without Americans like you.” Net neutrality was founded on protecting innovation and creating a level playing field for future entrepreneurs. This is why millions of people started supporting net neutrality in the first

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

As some of us might know there has been a passionate debate on the issue of the net neutrality in which there is strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Net neutrality is the idea government should regulate the internet so that the major telecommunications companies won’t be able to turn the internet landscape into a monopoly. This paper will examine both sides of the net neutrality debate in which the content of this paper will explore both the pro and cons of net neutrality. At the end of the paper I will reveal my true thoughts about net neutrality and will discuss what I have learned about this issue in the process. Some of the pros of net neutrality include easy access to information, promotion of free speech and promoting innovation for smaller internet companies.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

The Battle over net neutrality Network neutrality defines that Internet service providers should enable to all access to any contents and applications depending upon the web site with out broking any services. The Internet is neutral because it was built so Internet requires phone companies to treat all buyers, they cannot give extra leisure to buyers who are willing to pay for quicker and undisturbed. MoveOn.org, American library associations are some examples that are in favor network neutrality. This group argues about censorship risk increased when the Internet can selectivity block contents, others worried about slower transmission rates on their business diagram. Telecommunications and cable companies are opposing network neutrality

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

This, in effect, granted oligopolistic power to the conferences. Also increasing competition is the ability of carriers to use service contracts. These are agreements between carriers that set the terms for shipments, including duration, volume, and service level. It was the belief of the FMC report that this could help foster rivalry between firms to provide the best service. Problems with the

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

In contrast, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration conducted a survey, which determined that cost is the main reason the internet is not being utilized by everyone and that only “43% of households with income less than $25,000 had internet access in 2011” (H.R.3086 - Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act, 2014). If these findings are correct, although failure to pass the permanent legislation may not have a “significant” impact on the utilization of the internet as a whole, it may have a profound impact on internet usage by the economically disadvantaged and intern adversely affect innovation, education, and job creation for the

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

7 Third, network providers might want to give a traffic advantage to their content partners or to their own content, 8 reserving a fast track for favored content partners-like movie studios or television networks-who want their streaming media to flow uninterrupted to consumers; conversely, network providers would not protect the flow of content (or even slow down content) from non-partners, competitors, amateurs, and end-users.0 The principle of network neutrality holds that, in general, network providers may not discriminate against content, sites, or applications." ' Putting the principle into practice is more complicated than it might at first

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

For example, let's say that a large search engine corporation had a lot of spare money in the bank from advertising, and it decided to pay ISP's to give their traffic preferential treatment over a different website, such as a non profit like Wikipedia. That situation would not be fair in my mind, because a corporation uses its power to disproportionately gain an advantage in performance that is not justifiable. A core principle of the internet is being allowed to exercise one's freedom of speech. There should be no reason that someone who is acting within their constitutional right should be denied the opportunity to share their viewpoint in any way that they choose (2).

Read More
1806 Words | 8 Pages

Government regulation on the world wide web is one of the most heated topics being discussed around the globe today. Numerous arguments and debates on this subject have taken place and continue to do so. However, research shows that this type of power on innocent civilians is not necessary. There are various reasons as to why the government regulating the internet should be prohibited. The First Amendment of the Constitution comes with the right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Internet Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document