ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Lobbying Or Bribery

904 Words4 Pages
Lobbying or Bribery?

To start this off lobbying and bribery must be explained. Lobbying is the act of influencing a political or public official with money in order to gain favor. This is done within the confines of the law and is fully legal. Bribery on the other hand is basically the same thing except it is giving money with the intention of the person doing what you tell them. Bribery is illegal because it usually involves one person with a lot of money paying a politician in order for them to do as told. In truth bribery and lobbying are not very different. But even one being legal and the other one being illegal they both cause some amount of corruption when it comes to politics.

Lobbying the legal substitute for bribery, it has many problems inherently involved with it. When a person or corporation hires a lobbyist the lobbyist workload involves researching current and past legislative and regulatory proposals, while at the same time monitoring and storing information about current governmental issues. They also attend political hearings, and lastly informing the public and political officials. When it comes to lobbying corporations as a whole that pay for lobbyists and their activities spend about 2.6 billion a year. While the amount of money the government spends on the house and senate only amounts to 2 million. As we all know money plays a huge part in politics today, and how can it not when it cost thousands even hundreds of thousands to run a 30 second
Show More
Related
526 Words | 3 Pages

1)Campaign Campaign is when a person who holds political offices goes to different place giving their ideas and opinions about subjects hoping to gain the favor of the people. 2)Poll Poll is something that is used to determine how much support a person in political office has. Or how much support a person in a political office has lost. 3)Reapportionment Reapportionment is when a political office person has been reappointed to their current office holding.

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

In today’s government, there are two groups that can influence the way people vote for candidates in political races. They are known as a Super Pac and 501c4. Super Pacs are committees that became significant in 2010 after the court decision in the SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission (Super Pacs). A 501c4 is referred as “social welfare” groups. Their primary focus is to promote social welfare causes (Sullivan).

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Detailed tax and spending limitations make it difficult for legislators to operate efficiently. Furthermore, legislators are not paid very well for their part time work; they only make about $16,160 a year on average. This was intended to create a legislature of citizen-lawmakers who would better understand the needs and desires of their constituents. Ironically, the plan backfired, creating a body of lawmakers who are incredibly susceptible to influence by special interest groups. One way to combat this would be to create a full-time, professional legislature that meets

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

4. They are source of ideas and innovations. Lobbyists can’t introduce bills, but they can introduce an idea to and politician who will be eager to attach the lobbyists name

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

Politicians who avoided taking strong positions on whether they were pro or anti-trust were seen as cowards who would rather cater to big business than ensure the welfare of citizens. However, politicians were also reluctant to take action because they were being influenced by these corporations. A political illustration that arose at this time titled “The Bosses of the Senate”, demonstrates the ease at which monopolists were able to influence political decisions - or lack thereof (Document 3). The illustration depicts several industries-copper, steel, oil, iron, and coal- as bags of money hovering over senators at their desks. During this era, monopolists were able to buy state legislatures, which directly appointed senators to congress, and controlled which senators were in office through bribery, intimidation, and threats.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

In the article “Learning to Love our Lobbyist Friends”, Frederick Allen argues that lobbyists are an imperfect necessity to democracy. Allen argues that Americans adore the lobbyists who represent them, yet despise the ones who represent causes they oppose. Allen examines the history of lobbying, and how their transparency has changed over time. Lobbying has changed from a shady and secretive system composed of bribery and scandal to a much more open and heavily regulated system whose lobbyists are well-educated and dedicated to their causes. Although scandals and cases of bribery still do occur now, various pieces of legislation have been passed over the past century to make lobbying more transparent, with registration for a lobbyist being

Read More
2103 Words | 9 Pages

Many officeholders, legislators, and members of Academia argue that the supreme court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has single-handedly destroyed American democracy as we know it. This case is one of many that, in essence, allows legalized bribery to occur within the American political system, with most large money contributions to politicians coming from sizably influential corporations. Although many elected officials believe corporate money in politics strengthens democracy, it contrarily damages democracy and is the reason campaign finance reform is the greatest issue facing American politics. Since 1976, the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of cases like Buckley v. Valeo and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, which claims corporations are considered people; and based on First Amendment rights, people are allowed to spend their money within the political arena. Citizens United v. FEC is the supreme court decision that has led to further corruption within the American campaign finance system, while halting efforts to minimize money in politics.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Lobbyists speak with Congressmen and women directly, some go as far as testifying at congressional hearings. They have access only to the lower levels of the executive branch,

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Texas Lobbyists Lobbyists play an important role in the legislative process in Texas, as they represent the interests of various organizations and industries to influence legislation. They are professionals who work to promote or oppose legislation and policies on behalf of their clients. They use their expertise and experience to educate elected officials and policymakers on the impact of proposed laws on their client's interests. Lobbyists in Texas are required to register with the Texas Ethics Commission and file reports on their activities, including the amount of money they spend on lobbying efforts. This helps to ensure transparency in the lobbying process and prevent undue influence by special interests.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Representatives are elected from the United States citizenry to represent the people in Congress. Congressmen have to balance three things, national affairs, constituency matters, and party interests. Congress is influenced by money for campaigning, however normally this money comes from organizations and PAC's, for example the AARP. However the money does not come in the form of a bribe, with the AARP, instead they send out a questionnaire to candidates, and if they feel the candidate represents their interests, they will give them money for their campaign. PAC's are formed to combat individual donors and big businesses; they are essentially a pool of money, which represents certain interests.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Former member of the U.S. House of Representatives William Jefferson, while maybe not so known, was able to use his political power to gain for himself. He was a bribe taker during his terms in office making him a grafter. A grafter is someone who secretly takes money for political favors. These types of actions when discovered can get the person who has done them in many different kinds of trouble, including loss of job and even charges pressed. This crime by many is seen to be corruption, rightfully so, as things happen that might not have happened if money was not involved.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Corruption occurs in a government when politicians are bought out by private companies. These companies would pay the politicians large sums of money and in return, the politicians would do political favors for the companies. According

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

A select few powerful people or private entities lobby for certain bills or regulations to get passed. This benefits a select few people and costs are incurred by the taxpayer. This type of scenario can be describes as “rent seeking.” Rent seeking is when private entities get the government to foot the bill. It can be through subsidies or getting loans.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Interest groups in Texas are relatively powerful actors in the political process. Organized interest groups and their representatives, also known as “the lobby” participates in the policymaking and political processes in Texas. Interest groups provide critical channels for Texans to communicate their political preferences and attempt to influence government actors and their fellow

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

Seems like that 's kinda hard to believe. Some people see nothing wrong with the way corporations lobby. Corporation have been able to lobby forever so why is it a big deal now right? Well nowadays corporations are allowed to give money to people in political positions (Secular Talk). Once given the money the person in power would do favors for the business (Stealing From America).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Lobbying Or Bribery

Related Topics

Open Document