The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

497 Words2 Pages

The internet speed for your favorite websites can go faster, so why is net neutrality stopping this? First off net neutrality is where the internet providers send data for all websites equally. 2010 was the first recorded request to allow their websites to have a greater data speed than any other. The problem arises when companies want their websites to have a faster data speed in hopes to gain a bigger market, but people are worried that this would break the laws of net neutrality. The people are worried that by letting companies pay for faster website data speeds that it will stop website entrepreneurs from ever becoming popular. A more common way to perceive this is to pretend that it’s 2005 and that net neutrality didn’t exist. Any company could pay money to get faster website data speeds …show more content…

This is a benefit for both the user and the company to enjoy. One way to think about this is to imagine it like a mail system. When the mail system was first introduced mostly all mail was sent with equal speed, but today different websites offer different speeds of shipment. People love how they can now get their packages sooner rather than later. If net neutrality was ratified then a new evolution of internet speed will occur, along with the satisfaction of the users. The two examples above are the most common viewpoints of net neutrality where we have total net neutrality and zero net neutrality but there is a 3rd way of handling net neutrality. This way involves the internet provider, the website designer, and a 3rd party. The website designer would send a request to the 3rd party to allow their website to be a part of the metaphorical fast lane to the internet. The 3rd party would then look into their website to see if it has potential if the 3rd party decides yes the website will then gain faster data speeds. This option has been overseen by most because it depends on a group to