The Pros And Cons Of Operation Enduring Freedom

1608 Words7 Pages

Introduction Attack helicopters entered into Afghanistan in late 2001 and have been there ever since providing nearly round the clock air support. With countless engagements, precision lethal force, and persistent overhead security, attack aviation has proven itself as an integral necessity for the ground force during combat operations. The AH-64D and the OH-58D were the platforms of choice. Feared by the enemy, and revered by the Soldiers on the ground. The differences between the air superiority and freedom of maneuver seen in this conflict have not been witnessed before and very well may not be seen in the next fight. New and ever changing threats around the world may prove the tactics, techniques and procedures used during Operation Enduring Freedom to be ineffective. Yet, there have been lessons learned and aircraft upgrades that will forever prove useful. A new type of war From the days of Vietnam, “the helicopter war,” helicopter shoot downs were common place and expected. With enemy fire coming from every direction, helicopter pilots never expected a “boring day.” They were fighting a known enemy. Move into Afghanistan and the enemy has become unclear at times. No uniform and hidden amongst the civilian population. The original mission when the U.S. …show more content…

Our aircraft had no defense against this threat. Not until 2006 when the Common Missile Warning System was deployed years ahead of schedule and adapted to our aircraft. Since its installment, the Army has not seen a single aircraft downed by an IR missile system. Now, it seems, the Army’s aircraft have retaken the initiative and established our air superiority. While operating at higher altitudes, with a birds eye view of the fight, they were untouchable. The pilots felt a sense of invincibility (Macy,

More about The Pros And Cons Of Operation Enduring Freedom