The Pros And Cons Of Orthomolecular Medicine

1075 Words5 Pages

The fight against diseases remains an unconquerable battle, until the day all diseases, minor or severe, can be cured. Medicine is far from accomplishing this objective. Unfortunately, many unavoidably encounter such state of discomfort one point in life due to diseases. From the youngest newborn to the oldest of a hundred, diseases strike. Due to such circumstances, prescribed medication play a crucial role in controlling incommodious symptoms. Like prescribed drugs, other options are applicable, such as the uncommon method orthomolecular therapy. Orthomolecular therapy is another remedial method in which consists of natural supplementation of high doses of vitamins. These vitamins carry essential molecular components in which the body needs …show more content…

Not only is this method used to acquire health, but as a treatment to cure diseases. Let’s consider the following arguments that support the mentioned claims. First, orthomolecular therapy is not only used to treat diseases, but also provides additional advantageous consequences when consumed regularly at a recommended rate according to these specialist. This technique strengthens and supports full body systems from probable illnesses. Frequently consumed vitamins diminish the chance of obtaining a vitamin deficiency. Secondly, this meritorious method has treated devastating chronic diseases like cancer and numerous mental disorders. Orthomolecular therapy, not only inhibits the disease, but reduces the opportunity for additional diseases to develop. Finally, vitamin consumption does not produce detrimental side effects as prescribed drugs ensure. These side-effects, not only cause bothersome sensations, but damage internal organs. These deliberate arguments are key components that enhance optimistic usages of orthomolecular …show more content…

Dr. Linus Pauling is a reliable and dependable source, since he is entitled to two Nobel prizes. This chemist, scientifically proved his theory which involved treating patients diagnosed with mental illnesses, such as Phenylketonuria, depression, and other chemical imbalances of the brain with orthomolecular therapy. He claims orthomolecular therapy as exceptionally one of the best methods to cure mental diseases, since he, as well as his coworkers, present prove of its achievements. His journal supports my thesis plus offers creditable examples of how this method cures diverse mental illnesses. I include these examples to support my main arguments. I also used the provided research to compare it to prescribed medicine to observe which method possess more benefits. This source was written by another doctor, a former supporter of Dr. Pauling’s theory. Saul expanded on Pauling’s statement and researched evidential criteria that remarkably support his claim. He presents facts and statistics explaining how prescribed medication negatively correlates to a decrease of health, emphasizing orthomolecular therapy as superlative. Using the statistics presented, I was able to highlight the positive consequences that orthomolecular therapy offers. As a doctor himself, he too has successfully cured patients with

More about The Pros And Cons Of Orthomolecular Medicine