The Pros And Cons Of Sex-Selection Abortion

451 Words2 Pages

The key ethical issue in Case 2 is whether sex-selection abortions is justifiable- legally and morally permissible. To rephrase it, do parents have the right to abort or terminate a pregnancy based on the fetus gender. A possible right is allowing sex-selection abortions to be impermissible, both legally and morally. For instance, if a fetus is a person then abortion would be considered as a murder; therefore, it would be impermissible: in this case, no other alternatives would have been possible(326). Furthermore, sex-selection abortions would be impermissible at any given moment if a ban of the use of technology to determine the sex of an unborn child were to be placed; again, no possible alternatives would be available at this time(Vaughn 323). However, the problem of forcing sex-selection abortions to be impermissible is it forces people who may not be stable- financial or responsible- to bear a child. Consequently, the child quality of life would potentially be poor. As a result, another possible solution would be allowing sex-selection abortions …show more content…

Because choice is important, no alternatives are available or possible. In a somewhat like manner, the choice to have an abortion based on the fetus gender is like flexing a person’s autonomy- “to choose freely among those possibilities, and to act accordingly”(81). Therefore, sex-selection abortion would be permissible. Due to the fact, Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act and Roe v. Wade are upheld- a “time limit” of when a fetus can be terminated; therefore, no possible alternatives would be available at this time. In contrast, the problem or obstacle of forcing sex-selection abortion to be permissible is consider as discriminating based on gender or favoring a specific gender(323). Both, sex-selection abortion being impermissible or permissible, are possible rights, but the most “optimal” right would be the “Judith Thomson